would you fuck a clanker?

[crackers breakfast]

 

[Mayfly]

If she looks like the one from Battlestar Galactica, you bet I would.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

The real question is if being a robo-fucker or a dino-fucker is worse.

 

[Incongruous]

If they get good enough at mirroring human intimacy and it doesn't cost a few cents per prompt for sexting, then maybe. Sometimes ts makes me think back to when Kodak was thriving because MFs had to buy film and a disposable camera to take pictures. Now, I can take a picture of my iPhone and it's basically free, and Kodak isn't worth shit. When sex and intimacy become free, it won't just be companies like Kodak that go down the shitter, but the entirety of relationships with women in modern western society in general. If there'll be any loser, it'll be women. I bet it'll be a topic that pops up in the salon more and more in the next few years.

 

[Neodanthril]

Who need they clankussy ate

 

[Arbiter]

 

[crackers breakfast]

The real question is if being a robo-fucker or a dino-fucker is worse.

well one of them has less chance of getting you electrocut

 

[vinsentia]

Nope.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Futurama: Don't Date Robots!

 

[Historical Strelkov]

Not sure, but I would clank a fucker.

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

When sex and intimacy become free

it already is, and always was

If there'll be any loser, it'll be women

i believe women are far more likely to fall into the ai sexting trap

 

[Arbiter]

Now the question is, do cyborgs count as clankers? Is General Grievous a clanker?

 

[ChristianKiwi]

it already is, and always was

i believe women are far more likely to fall into the ai sexting trap

Apparently many women are forming parasocial relationships with their AI of choice than men are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for the topic: No, I will not live in the pod. I will not eat the bug. I will not have sex with the clanker.
I will own whatever I desire and be happy.

 

[Nicholas Gur]

No.