US With Eisenhower renaming, Army’s 100+ years honoring Confederates ends - Speaking to reporters ahead of the ceremony, post commander Maj. Gen. Paul Stanton lauded the “transition from arguably a failed leader to a visionary, world leader that resonated with all of the soldiers that he led.”

eisenhower.png
A statue of Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, the 34th President of the United States, as seen October 27, 2023, during a renaming ceremony in his honor at Fort Eisenhower, Georgia. (Davis Winkie/Staff)

FORT EISENHOWER, Ga. — When this installation’s former namesake invaded Maryland, the U.S. Army shot him five times.

Despite receiving five bullets at Antietam in 1862 — and three additional wounds in other battles — as he rose from captain to major general in the Confederate army during the Civil War, former slaveowner John Brown Gordon survived to become the head of the Ku Klux Klan in Georgia.

As a member of the U.S. Senate, Gordon helped negotiate the end of Reconstruction in 1877, which rehabilitated the white Southern elite and allowed a new era of racial oppression to emerge. A two-term governor of Georgia, Gordon was also the first commander of the United Confederate Veterans.

But in a Friday morning ceremony just outside of Augusta, the Army eschewed Gordon’s legacy in favor of that of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the post’s new namesake. Eisenhower helped lead the destruction of Nazi Germany as a five-star general in World War II, and oversaw key racial integration milestones later as president. In 1957, Eisenhower deployed the 101st Airborne Division to Arkansas and federalized the state’s National Guard when the governor attempted to block nine Black students from attending Little Rock Central High School.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth spoke of Eisenhower’s achievements in a speech accompanying the ceremony, which members of the former president’s family attended.

Friday’s renaming marks the final such installation-level move for the Army, culminating a nearly three-year process that began when Congress’ fiscal 2021 defense policy bill established the bipartisan Naming Commission to rename the military’s places and objects that honored Confederates. Four members of the commission attended the final redesignation at Eisenhower.

Wormuth’s remarks also acknowledged how the renaming process emerged from the “unrest and significant division in our country” that followed racial justice protests sparked by the 2020 death of George Floyd. But she celebrated how the new namesakes “unquestionably represent” what the Army wants to see from its future soldiers and leaders.

eisenhower 2.png
Four members of the Naming Commission — from left to right: businessman and former Army drill sergeant Jerry Buchanan, retired Navy Adm. Michelle Howard, retired Air Force Lt. Col. Lawrence Romo and retired Army Brig. Gen. Ty Seidule — pose after the redesignation ceremony for Fort Eisenhower, Georgia, on October 27, 2023. The event was the final base renaming event. (Davis Winkie/Staff)

The vice chair of the commission, retired Army Brig. Gen. Ty Seidule, voiced a similar sentiment in a Wednesday phone interview.

“It’s never too late to recognize true American heroes...that represent the values of this great country,” he said.

The following Army installations received new names this year:
  • Fort Barfoot, Virginia, once Fort Pickett, was renamed after Col. Van T. Barfoot on March 24. He received the Medal of Honor during World War II for his actions as a noncommissioned officer in Italy in 1944.
  • Fort Novosel, Alabama, once Fort Rucker, was renamed on April 10 for Chief Warrant Officer Michael Novosel, who fought in three wars and received the Medal of Honor for a Vietnam War medical evacuation mission.
  • Fort Gregg-Adams, Virginia, once Fort Lee, was rechristened April 27 for Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg, the Army’s first Black lieutenant general, and Lt. Col. Charity Adams, who commanded the all-Black female 6888th Postal Battalion during World War II
  • Fort Cavazos, Texas, once Fort Hood, was redesignated for infantry Gen. Richard Cavazos, the service’s first Latino four-star, on May 9. Cavazos, who led soldiers in both Korea and Vietnam, twice received the Distinguished Service Cross.
  • Fort Bragg, North Carolina, became Fort Liberty on June 2.
  • Fort Polk, Louisiana, transitioned to Fort Johnson on June 13. Nearly a century after his exploits, Sgt. William Henry Johnson of the World War I “Harlem Hellfighters,” received the Medal of Honor in 2015.
  • Fort A.P. Hill, Virginia, transitioned to Fort Walker, named for Civil War surgeon and Medal of Honor recipient Mary Edwards Walker, August 25.
  • Camp Beauregard, Louisiana, was renamed Louisiana National Guard Training Center-Pineville on Oct. 20.
But the changes went beyond merely base names. The Naming Commission identified more than 1,100 objects across the Defense Department — ranging from the USS Chancellorsville to street names — whose labels rated reconsideration, transforming the commemorative landscape of military installations across America.

‘The Confederates chose treason’​

Speaking to reporters ahead of the ceremony, post commander Maj. Gen. Paul Stanton lauded the “transition from arguably a failed leader to a visionary, world leader that resonated with all of the soldiers that he led.” The two-star oversees the Army’s cyber warfare schools.

For one commission member in the audience, Friday’s moment held heavy professional — and personal — significance.

Naming Commission vice chair Seidule, an armor officer who retired in 2020 as head of West Point’s history department, grew up blind to the damage that the Confederacy and its legacy did to American society, he explained in a 2021 memoir. He fell sway to the “Lost Cause” myth, which holds that the Civil War was not fought over the issue of slavery.

In an interview with Army Times on Wednesday, Seidule said his personal turning point was when he came to understand that Robert E. Lee and other Confederate officers committed treason. He thus celebrated the renaming as an opportunity to align the military’s symbols with its values.

The modern Fort Gordon was established just before the U.S. entered World War II in 1941, but it was named for a predecessor World War I camp that was based in the city of Decatur, Georgia, located just northeast of Atlanta.

According to historians, the War Department intentionally named World War I bases in the South after Confederates in order to appease local elites and inspire the mostly-white units that trained in hastily built camps near where they lived. Many of the names stuck.

eisenhower 3.png
Soldiers training at Camp Gordon, Georgia, parade in an undated 1918 photo. The first iteration of Camp Gordon was located near Decatur, a city just northeast of Atlanta. It closed after the war's end. (National Archives and Records Administration)

“By 1917, all the Southern states had redone their constitutions with the explicit purpose of disenfranchising Black people,” said Seidule. “It was also the height of lynching, and it was also the time when Jim Crow laws…came together.”

That era was when the Lost Cause myth came into bloom — the vast majority of Confederate monuments were raised between 1900 and 1920. Many were sponsored by groups like the United Daughters of the Confederacy that also rewrote school books to minimize slavery’s role in the Civil War. But their whitewashed version of history is false, Seidule argued.
“The Confederates chose treason to preserve slavery; they killed U.S. Army soldiers. And many of them renounced their oath [in order] to create a slave republic,” Seidule said. He added that the former base names emerged when the service was a “segregationist Army, and they just don’t reflect the values that we have today.”

But Eisenhower does reflect those values, Friday’s speakers declared.

Wormuth praised his “loyalty, integrity and selfless service.”

The installation commander, Stanton, urged soldiers to “go back and…look at the pictures. Look at the eye contact that Gen. Eisenhower makes with the soldiers that are under his command. They know that they’re being led by a man of character, and he inspired them to do their life’s best work on a daily basis, whether that be in combat, whether that be in training, or whether that be later in life.”

He and the other speakers noted that honoring Eisenhower with a base name was long overdue.

Eisenhower’s local legacy​

Although a number of finalists for the Georgia post’s name were worthy of the honor, the Naming Commission selected Eisenhower in a decision that the Washington Post reported emerged from “last-minute lobbying” on the former president’s behalf. Some critics of the decision, who believed the choice undercut worthy Black candidates with local ties, argued that Eisenhower lacked adequate connections to the installation.

Retired Adm. Michelle Howard, who served as the commission’s chair, said community members overwhelmingly overrode the group’s suggested finalists to suggest Eisenhower.

And Eisenhower’s ties to the nearby city of Augusta are hard to deny. Over the course of his life, he made 45 trips to the city along the Savannah River. He became a member of Augusta National Golf Club — home of the iconic Masters tournament — in 1948, and frequented it through his presidency and beyond until his death in 1969 following his third heart attack. The president also joined a local Presbyterian church.

In his remarks at the ceremony, Stanton succinctly said, “Here…we like Ike,” referring to the post namesake’s presidential campaign slogan.

eisenhower 4.png
The Main Gate at Fort Eisenhower, Georgia, seen shortly before its Oct. 27, 2023 redesignation ceremony. (Maria Blanchard/Army)

Wormuth alluded to these local connections in her remarks, and also highlighted the installation’s role during World War II producing soldiers who served under the five-star general’s command.

Stanton also argued that Eisenhower’s legacy as an “innovator” and “technologist“ make him a strong symbolic fit for the Army’s cradle of cyber warfare.

“If you look at the things that he pioneered during his two successive administrations,” like the U-2 spy plane, NASA and the Advanced Research Projects Agency, the two-star said, “we wouldn’t have the [tech] solutions that we leverage now.”

Between World War I and World War II, Eisenhower and his contemporary, Gen. George Patton, helped the Army overhaul its maneuver warfare doctrine to better incorporate the rapid technological advancement of the tank.

“You can bind visionary world leader, warrior, statesman, [and] man of character with the technology,” Stanton said. “It’s the perfect combination for Fort Eisenhower.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Última edición:
LOL...just try to tell me this shit isn't malicious

They renamed Fort Lee after some nobody black lady. That's just pure spite right there. No other base was named as such so replacing Lee's legacy with some black cunt who didn't du nuffin is an obvious slap at history.

Heehee, let stick it to them MAGA chuds! Look Fort Lee is now Fort Single Mom with 8 kids with 6 Differnt Fathers. Teeheehee.
 
I think it's a good break. Some 4 foot tall goblina or sheboon strutting around in a Marine Corps or Army uniform is just coasting on the inertial legacy created by competent white men over 200 years of history anyway. This is a good psychological demarcation between the old military that actually won wars for a country that put men on the moon and whatever this clown show that couldn't win a war to save its life is degenerating into. As a nice bonus it drives home to southern white men that these creaturas hate them and are their enemy, and under no circumstances should they risk life and limb to keep their failing empire propped up.
 
I tend to agree with this. My wheelhouse is the Navy and the Navy has been on the back foot, constantly in a state or degradation since the Cold War ended. The OPTEMPO is unsustainable and after the Cold War they decommissioned most of the shipyards, pretty much all the salvage and supply ships, and we’ve been completely slacking in maintenance cycles because of both. We couldn’t pull off a Yorktown again, where the carrier got hit one day and less than a week later it was fixed and back in the fight.

The reason why I say this is because how much money was spent over the past three years in this committee to come up with names? Millions, at least. Millions that could’ve gone to fixing the state of our most relevant military branch to sustaining our Empire and defending our country. I’m not really against, as it were, renaming these things because having bases named after Confederates never really sat right with me. But the ideological motivation BEHIND this current movement to do it and the complete collapse of our ability to wage a sustained naval war to the point where I’m not sure we could do it anymore makes me suspect and frankly I’m against this.

Whatever. At least I’m out.
The crop of people in the military now are basically military brats that want to wave pride flags and not feel guilty about being arms dealers.

These aren't the old generation of cold warriors and Vietnam vets. These guys are all Gen X queers and user types.
I wonder what future civil strife will be like when there's nothing left before the year 1945. Obviously there's still the Civil Rights movement years to cry about but will there be trannies rioting in the streets to erase Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X shit for Keffals?
That's a thing I've nooticed in American revisionism. Nothing before 1945 is allowed to exist. Must be some sort of Birth of Christ level event to certain people at top.
That seems like the point notice how people have very little knowledge of what the world was like pre 1914 this was done for a reason.
 
They're just going to replace that elegant and meaningful statue with nigger sculpture like this, which was supposed to commemorate Martin Luther King, Jr. and looks like a woman's hands holding up a giant turd or maybe a dick.

mlk nigger sculpture.png
 
I wonder what future civil strife will be like when there's nothing left before the year 1945. Obviously there's still the Civil Rights movement years to cry about but will there be trannies rioting in the streets to erase Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X shit for Keffals?
That's a thing I've nooticed in American revisionism. Nothing before 1945 is allowed to exist. Must be some sort of Birth of Christ level event to certain people at top.
Boomer Truth Regime. It does mark the beginning of the American Empire, one which the US is increasingly proving it does not deserve to retain.
 
I tend to view the ones that supported or tolerated the KKK and other groups committing acts of violence against freedmen and Northerners as the ones we need to remove. This approach should never apply to any battlefield monuments commemorating Confederate forces and their dead under any circumstances. Those are not only funerary monuments but also a powerful symbol of national reconcilaition.

Others like Lee, Jackson, Beauregard, and Longstreet are examples of the best this country has to offer that should never be forgotten and always commemorated.

A lot of people don't know Stonewall Jackson committed a pretty serious crime teaching a slave how to read and write because he always kept his promises. He was a man of impeccable character and deep faith and it was a real loss to this country that he was killed during the war.

He would have done great things to help the reunited nation had he survived.
Speaking of the KKK, look into its founder, Nathan Bedford Forrest. Ironically, he wound up regretting it pretty hard due to their nigger-tier behavior and before long ordered the whole organization disbanded and soon disavowed any and all ideas of white supremacy and began actively working towards racial conciliation.
 
You're both right. Lee didn't want the war and did it anyway and regretted it and was in general an extremely complicated guy.

His statue was well-made and I hope his story is never forgotten.
 
There was a conscious decision to not try CSA officers for treason so that the nation could heal and move on. Moreover, so many of the nation's fighting men came from and continue to come from the South that there was again a conscious decision to allow them to keep their heroes and see them as American.

What the new revisionism says is the Union made a colossal mistake after the Civil War. It should have prosecuted the war more fully, hunting down and killing every last CSA leader, burning down the whole of the South if need be, and we are now correcting that mistake. If only the Civil War had lasted even longer - perhaps become America's own Thirty Years' War with millions instead of hundreds of thousands dead - the evil could have been purged, racism could have been ended, and all black people's problems solved by blood (nevermind what would have actually happened to the slave population in such a war).

Of course, the people saying this are too cowardly to ever fight in an actual war themselves. If they were truly so passionate about spilling rivers of blood to end slavery, they'd be beating the drums to invade China right now. Millions upon millions of dead are worth it. Slavery is bad, right, guys? Instead, they write articles about how trade with China is "complicated" and how it's too "morally complex" to just not make iPhones there because, well, what if we couldn't afford iPhones?
 
They probably spent millions to sit in a boardroom for three years to come up with names that would've taken a single person an afternoon to brainstorm.
"This Eisen...hower (did I say that right?), this guy seems like a good choice to name the base after. Sure, he was white but he was born after the Civil War... I think. Yeah. I think he lived in Europe for a while as well, so he wasn't the usual problematic type of American that never travels."

Kill me.
 
"This Eisen...hower (did I say that right?), this guy seems like a good choice to name the base after. Sure, he was white but he was born after the Civil War... I think. Yeah. I think he lived in Europe for a while as well, so he wasn't the usual problematic type of American that never travels."

Kill me.

Oh, it was worse, I'm sure.

"He led antifa in the fight against fascism."
 
For the Euros here, your "European Union" is exactly like the United States before the American Civil War. A continental sized roach Hotel California where your country can check in but can never check out. As it will be eventually be no longer a country but a province sized company town.
Yeah this is the main reason a lot of Americans are against the EU. They know America's history well enough to know how this shit can end up with some weird authoritarians deciding they know better than the citizens and deciding to suppress them if they get uppity.
 
There was a conscious decision to not try CSA officers for treason so that the nation could heal and move on. Moreover, so many of the nation's fighting men came from and continue to come from the South that there was again a conscious decision to allow them to keep their heroes and see them as American.

What the new revisionism says is the Union made a colossal mistake after the Civil War. It should have prosecuted the war more fully, hunting down and killing every last CSA leader, burning down the whole of the South if need be, and we are now correcting that mistake. If only the Civil War had lasted even longer - perhaps become America's own Thirty Years' War with millions instead of hundreds of thousands dead - the evil could have been purged, racism could have been ended, and all black people's problems solved by blood (nevermind what would have actually happened to the slave population in such a war).

Of course, the people saying this are too cowardly to ever fight in an actual war themselves. If they were truly so passionate about spilling rivers of blood to end slavery, they'd be beating the drums to invade China right now. Millions upon millions of dead are worth it. Slavery is bad, right, guys? Instead, they write articles about how trade with China is "complicated" and how it's too "morally complex" to just not make iPhones there because, well, what if we couldn't afford iPhones?
Yep, loads of excellent Confederate officers because reconciliation-ists after the wat and a good many served in the Spanish American war.
 
Yep, loads of excellent Confederate officers because reconciliation-ists after the wat and a good many served in the Spanish American war.
For the U.S. military the Spanish-American War was extremely important just on this one point. To whether ACW veterans and younger Americans both Northerner and Southerner can get along and fight side-by-side against a peer foe instead of each other.
 
For the U.S. military the Spanish-American War was extremely important just on this one point. To whether ACW veterans and younger Americans both Northerner and Southerner can get along and fight side-by-side against a peer foe instead of each other.

The Civil War was as close to WW1 as the Vietnam War is to today.
 
I wish I could go back in time with a conex full of 240bs and M4s and ammunition and give them to Lee on the condition they raze every urban conurbation in the Northeast corridor.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo