💼 Careercow Will Stancil / whstancil / stancilculture - "Vibecession" proponent and Biden booster neolib, the "chihuahua of twitter", Important Master's Degree (in Black People), chooses endurance mode "lolcowing through it" as an argument strategy, "Proud member of Do-Something Twitter", raped by Grok

Destacado
Meat Target dijo:
"I grew up in the South"

Ahhh, the favorite argument of John Walker Flynt.

Good OP, insufferable nerds like this deserve it.
Presiona para expandir...
I seriously suspect his raging animus against "red necks" was being flamboyantly homosexual in a small southern town. Going to Minnesota and literally majoring in nigger worship(public policy and desegregation) is spite to the Southern bubbas who laughed at his faggotry in ninth grade.
 
DJ Grelle dijo:
Like some lefty political commentator version of Fatrick.
Presiona para expandir...
Halfway down the (excellent) OP I thought 'Good grief, it's a more articulate Fatrick. Enjoy stats stlaker'. Then I momentarily confused Stancil with Wheaton and murmured 'Shut up Wesley'.

Can we have some older tweets to get a flavor of his development?
 
Weren't there two white anti-racist "activists" that died last year because of black people. Someone will remember who I am talking about.

In any case, how long until this guy joins them? My bet will be that he gets stabbed by a gangbanger on his way to pick up a fresh hotdog that he can slurp down solo style, imagining it were black and not pinkish-red.
 
The only thing that could complete the overall impression of a pedantic, supercilious and insecure nerd who's still stuck in a 'just received a swirly in the boys locker room' mindset would be if he had the kind of nasally, bleating voice that would make anybody with even a passing knowledge of contact sports instinctively clench their fists.

(Archive)

Screenshot 2024-01-31 230240.jpg
 
One thing I noticed reading his substack and listening to that, is he'll always preface a statement with "I'm not a economist/epidemiologist/geneticist etc..."

And then proceed to expound on the topic with great enthusiasm. To be charitable, it may be humility but more likely it's a form of CYAing-"I'm paying proper homage to the credentialed EXPERTs so please don't think I'm a pseudointellectual who doesn't know what he's talking about"

Creatures like Stancil live and die by striver obsessions and fall into line like well drilled soldiers at the sound of the word "expert"-so when babbling on a subject-he has to let you know he's paying homage to the correct priests and not speaking out of turn-which ensures his peers don't start thinking he's a pseud.

(The worst imaginable thing)


Holy shit, he’s still going.
 
Última edición:
This is just my gut feeling, but I think that much like Fatrick this guy can be milked for quite a bit of laughs. Will he ever reach Fatrick's sweaty heights? Maybe not, but it seems to have potential.
 
He started off arguing hereditarianism is wrong and now he's arguing immigrants make dying small towns vibrant with their amazing food.

Holy Shit, have we found the platonic incarnation of the shitlib caricature?

Like, I'm less upset that he says this shit and more than "people" like Stancil actually exist.

Its genuinely disturbing.
 
Will is the rare twitter hot take machine that can't seem to own anyone. Lefties I guess mocked him too much for his "Biden is US Jesus" shtick so I assume he tried to pivot to what he thought would be easier targets to own, not realizing he is kind of an idiot.

I love it when he tries to act like his masters gives him massive, broad insight into countless topics, when in reality, it means he is hyper specialized and the last math class he ever took was probably his sophomore year of college.
 
He's basically arguing for Matthew Yglesias libtard patriotism now.

"Immigrants make America great, because well they have food and culture okay!"

Being a homosexual he has no stake in the future, and thus all America is to him-is an open air shopping mall and food court. After all why not sample every kind of slop from every newly arrived hominid? Not like my kids future is at stake or the Somalis I lionize are taking up space that my descendants ought to have.

Its a frustratingly effective argument-because most conservatives can't articulate what civilization is for, on non materialist grounds themselves.

So Will can just argue "economic dynamism" until the end of time. Immigrant crime and dysfunction? Well GDP line go up, so whatever. Immigrants take up housing, and destroy the (already gone) social fabric-so long as I get to consume in comfort, who cares?

Its honestly the peak liberal mentality-there is nothing of value except whatever satisfies your stomach and makes someone money somewhere-whether that be Somalis hawking used cell phones or Chinese laundry washers. Money is made, food is consumed, and I the homosexual with no stake in the future can sit happy and gawk at all the diverse chatterings and babble on the market corner.
 
This soft snowmalia baby-faced nerd is flinging shit non-stop in every direction.

stancil cucks.png


"If you want to reduce crime you’re better off deporting white people, who commit more of it, than immigrants. It’s a big country and it’s easy to cherry-pick bad things, but Musk is targeting immigrants because he’s a xenophobic creep trying to spread hate"
 
I need to find this study he cites-no way Hispanic migrants commit less crime than the native White population. It doesn't pass the smell test at all.


According to this 2019 study, sentencing rates in both state and federal systems. (US residents)

435,000 blacks sentenced(all male), 374,900 Whites, and 301,700 Hispanics'

(This isn't accounting for accurate identification)

"Other" is 167,400-I'm presuming this is Asians, Natives, Polynesians, mixed and Hispanics not marked as Hispanic(or Mixed Race).

That's over 75% of US crime though. Cut out black and "other" is what I want to see.


ucr.fbi.gov

Expanded Homicide Data Table 3

ucr.fbi.gov ucr.fbi.gov

Okay, I admit I'm getting a bit lost in the statistics.

Something though isn't right about the claim Hispanic migrants commit less crime. That just isn't believable.

Anyone feel free and go through the data.

Its honestly really hard to find specific crime rates for Latinos. (Probably because the category just means brown with Spanish sounding name).


Okay now that makes more sense-the “study” is conflating immigrants.

Guatemalan gang bangers and Christian Hong Kongers are grouped together. No wonder the study claims immigrants have lower crime rates than Whites.
 
Última edición:
Steve Sailer wrote a response article:

The Ever-Present Questions (Archive)​

Coo Coo Bird dijo:
The race-IQ question remains the most controversial in all of American discourse. In this column, however, I’m going to step back from my hectic and hilarious week dismantling the tweets of outraged midwit Will Stancil, who has been inadvertently conducting a one-man marketing campaign for my new greatest-hits anthology Noticing: An Essential Steve Sailer Reader: 1973-2023 (the paperback is $29.95 with free domestic shipping if you enter the discount code STANCIL).

Instead, I’ll reflect upon some of the more difficult philosophy of science questions raised by the race-IQ conundrum. There are, it appears, good reasons not to be too confident that whichever side you come down on is definitely the right one.

I’m not going to run through all the data, but let’s start by reviewing a few basic facts.

There is no valid controversy today over whether racial differences in cognitive test scores exist. Although many Americans are shocked when they hear that whites outscore blacks on average (although they tend to be less shocked when they hear that Asians average higher than whites), this might be the most exhaustively documented finding in the history of the social sciences.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Will has claimed victory because apparently he's immune to argument(something Noah Smith has said).

But seeing his comments on immigration reveal his actual priorities-he's just biomass wishing for more placid consumption brought on by more biomass.

That's why homosexuals are such a menace-as far as Stancil is concerned, America exists to give him new foods to try, or "experiences"(that is transactionally derived sensations and ephemera)-the very idea of civilization as such is not something he can conceive.

When we say liberals bring about the death of civilization-its easy to argue its hysterical and right wing paranoia.

But this is what we mean-liberals have no interest in the future beyond the opportunity for more consumption, no regard for the past, and view the present as all "there is"-doordash, prestige HBO, and anal sex.

Who cares about the next ten years or the next century? Much less a millennium. He'll be dead and in the ground in sixty years, so it doesn't matter.

Creatures like Stancil aren't unaware of the risks or the possibility of death or maiming(even at their pets hands) they just lack the cognitive framework to care-a worm has no existential concerns for itself or its progeny, it lives to consume by rote mechanical instinct.

You can't reason with libtards like this-its not so much they have an emotional investment in equality or multiculturalism(though they do) as much as they are sterile genetic waste that understand consciously or not-globohomo is what allows them to exist. Get rid of the Mexicans and blacks and implement an actual civilization-and Stancil is left as an unemployed homosexual with no purpose, no goodies, and no reason not to dive into the dirt and join his fellow worms. So their very existence is bound up with "open air strip mall America"-it makes them possible.

They cannot imagine any telos outside of it, and are instinctively hostile to anyone who suggests such.

You have to destroy them.

So long as they have even a .0000000001% influence though-they bring death, the same way an HIV infection does.
 
Stancil isn’t even trying to make some sort of moral case for anti racism, (he knows he can’t and it won’t work) as much as hoping he can build clout by taking on the Nazis to a liberal audience.

In the view this will expose republicans as having intimate connections with the nazi fringe, and thus…discredit them.
 
Ishtar dijo:
Stancil isn’t even trying to make some sort of moral case for anti racism, (he knows he can’t and it won’t work) as much as hoping he can build clout by taking on the Nazis to a liberal audience.

In the view this will expose republicans as having intimate connections with the nazi fringe, and thus…discredit them.
Presiona para expandir...
It's moronic because he has already alienated his liberal audience with his whole "Biden fix everything chuds" bit he did for months.
 
I'm honestly surprised Will didn't have a thread earlier. The man is a surreal caricature of everything people hate about neolibs.

I've never seen someone outside of Ralph or Kefalls make themselves out to be such a retard so quickly.

This deserves a shoutout in community happenings if it goes public imo.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo