Feedback Wildcard rating

[The Fool]

People are always recommending new ratings. I suggest just adding a Wildcard rating, and then after someone rates a post Wildcard they can reply to it saying what their rating meant.

I think it's pretty genius if you ask me.

 

[Null]

People are always recommending new ratings. I suggest just adding a Wildcard rating, and then after someone rates a post Wildcard they can reply to it saying what their rating meant.

I think it's pretty genius if you ask me.

that's called making a post

 

[OwO What's This?]

that's called making a post

have a 'Maverick!' rating that is John McCain's face we can use whenever someone says completely unintelligible.

 

[Ruin]

Make it Charlie Day's face.

 

[ES 148]

Make it the black +4 card from Uno.

 

[MrTroll]

Make a @Wildchild rating instead for posts that help to resolve conflicts and/or use superfluous exclamation marks.

 

[Kazami Yuuka]

No, we should switch to Dumb-only ratings. After all, any reason to negatively rate a post is due to some stupidity in a sense. And since we're all dumb, just some less than others, it fits that there should be no positive ratings. Thus, we would have the stupidest users, and the least stupid users.

 

[CWCissey]

have a 'Maverick!' rating that is John McCain's face we can use whenever someone says completely unintelligible.

Well we know who the child here is.

Donald Rumsfeld or nothing for unintelligible gibberish!

 

[AnOminous]

There should be a Wildchild rating and if you get it you get banned.

 

[The Fool]

There should be a Wildchild rating and if you get it you get banned.