Why is transing kids wrong, but converting them perfectly acceptable?

[Fruttasecca]

chemical castration for fags

How about a bullet to the head?

 

[Necrosan]

I'm going to tell you a secret. It might be hard to understand at first but just keep an open mind:

Spoiler: The secret

You can be against both things at the same time.

Mind you, as long as my children are healthy, adjusted and aren't harming anyone then they can believe in the Old Ones if they want.

People need to trust their guts and common sense more. It's like at some point people lost basic thinking skills and think that because you are against something that means you are for something else.

 

[Squanto Airi]

It's like at some point people lost basic thinking skills and think that because you are against something that means you are for something else.

The Twitter Effect.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Appeal to worse problems fallacy, the second appearance.

That'd maybe apply if the thread title didn't suggest that trooning kids is at minimum equally as bad as whatever that link highlights, which nearly certainly isn't true.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

as well as what happened to Alen Turing

What happened to Turing was his own fault. Just like with any other person in all of history, who experiences negative consequences as a result of their own poor choices.
I would say that Turing also happened to live in a time where his perversions literally made him a security risk, but given the way fags and trannies still constantly commit treason in the modern era, it seems just par for the course.

@FaggotUserName
Is the Quiverfull not so worrisome for young girls

No, because young girls are not getting married and having lots of children. And what's wrong with encouraging women to have families, retard?

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

And what's wrong with encouraging women to have families, retard?

Because that's sexist, probably.

 

[BestUserName]

You literally asked to see it, my dude. I don't know what else to tell you.

You didn't walk into a thread full of people talking about how great various conversion therapies are and post that in an attempt to argue, you created a thread, created a strawman, and then asked to see the, "pleading," that you then got. You wanted ragebait. You got it.

Is it a strawman if people have sincerely expressed such beliefs? I don't know and am genuinely asking.

I'm going to tell you a secret. It might be hard to understand at first but just keep an open mind:

Spoiler: The secret

You can be against both things at the same time.

Mind you, as long as my children are healthy, adjusted and aren't harming anyone then they can believe in the Old Ones if they want.

People need to trust their guts and common sense more. It's like at some point people lost basic thinking skills and think that because you are against something that means you are for something else.

I'm not saying that that they aren't both bad, or even that trans-kids isn't worse, I'm saying if you're going justify state bans for the former (as well as children seeing drag performances) on the grounds of "harm to children", don't retreat to "freedom of religion" for the latter.

 

[Netizennameless]

I would say that Turing also happened to live in a time where his perversions literally made him a security risk

Being a degenerate will always be a security risk.

I'm not saying that that they aren't both bad, or even that trans-kids isn't worse, I'm saying if you're going justify state bans for the former (as well as children seeing drag performances) on the grounds of "harm to children", don't retreat to "freedom of religion" for the latter.

They are objectively not both bad. Trying to fix deviant or disturbing behavior or patterns of thinking is equivalent to psychiatry or medical care. You can criticise the methods used but not the intent or the practice itself. Mutilating a child to play along with gender delusion is child abuse and medical malpractice in all cases. They are not the same and no amount of literary tricks will make them equivalent.

 

[Not 6 Foot]

Is it a strawman if people have sincerely expressed such beliefs? I don't know and am genuinely asking.

Considering you began the thread by arguing against an idea that nobody initially presented you with, yes.
"This is bad so why don't you think this is?"
Who was this aimed at? Nobody. You then asked people to make the argument you were pretending to have for you. Naturally someone will oblige.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Considering you began the thread by arguing against an idea that nobody initially presented you with, yes.
"This is bad so why don't you think this is?"
Who was this aimed at? Nobody. You then asked people to make the argument you were pretending to have for you. Naturally someone will oblige.

OP in comic form:

 

[Big Brutus]

It doesn't matter to the Autistic Thunderdome if kids are raped, it only matters whether the rapists are Team Red or Team Blue.

Wait until you find out about the people that are obsessed with underage breasts and robot lolis.

 

[Oilspill Battery]

Why are appendectomies on people with appendecitis acceptable but me asking the doctor to cut my perfectly healthy arm off isn't?

 

[Taser Confetti]

this

This reminds me of the boomercons on this board who think they need to glaze Jews because Muslims are icky. It's possible to be against two things at the same time.

Society is always gonna have kids that are little fruitcakes. Ironically, trying to traumatize this kid with Bible thumper bullshit has less long term damage to his psyche than some mother nowadays who'd be convinced he's trans and needs to be chemically mutilated.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

It doesn't matter to the Autistic Thunderdome if kids are raped, it only matters whether the rapists are Team Red or Team Blue.

Noticing Team Blue pushes for its normalization and legalization, and commits more of it, and sexually mutilates them under the pretense they can consent which implies they can consent to sex too, is not thinking it "only matters" when one "team" does it, kill yourself.

if you're going justify state bans for the former (as well as children seeing drag performances) on the grounds of "harm to children", don't retreat to "freedom of religion" for the latter.

Demonstrate the "harm" for your position in detail then, you haven't articulated a proper argument.

Ironically, trying to traumatize this kid with Bible thumper bullshit has less long term damage to his psyche than some mother nowadays who'd be convinced he's trans and needs to be chemically mutilated.

It's not traumatizing to read the Bible LOL

 

[Taser Confetti]

It's not traumatizing to read the Bible LOL

Can be. Regardless your superstitions have no place in our nations politics.

 

[EmpGulcasa]

They're both wrong, hope that helps.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

Gay is natural to a certain degree, even if people who go "WHAT I WANT IS NATURAL!" get salty about it.

First sons tend to be straight, with subsequent ones being more likely to be gay. Tribal logic and even written history can explain why, and if we invoke selfish genes (NOT INDIVIDUALS, GENES) it makes even more sense.

Social argument: homos could still defend the tribe and not compete for women.
Genetic argument: homos could protect the offspring of the breeding sibling. Both the homo and normal sibling carry the same gene. This is what trips people up.

Me, now: Idgaf if someone's gay, I care if someone is a faggot or a groomer. Faggots are degenerate hedonists who degenerate everything around them and sucker people into hedonistic bullshit, they do not help society. Groomers make people traumatically homosexual, which in turn tends to become a self sustaining production of induced homosexuality.

Both need to go to a wood chipper.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Can be. Regardless your superstitions have no place in our nations politics.

No, it cannot be. And our nation is built on my "superstitions", which are simply the truth despite you not liking that.

Gay is natural to a certain degree

Insofar as any mental illness is natural, sure.

 

[Sneed's Feed n Seed]

Insofar as any mental illness is natural, sure.

And?

Disease exists in nature.
Homos exist in nature.
Troons do not exist in nature

Disease is bad. Homos are bad.

Troons are worse.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

And?

Disease exists in nature.
Homos exist in nature.
Troons do not exist in nature

Disease is bad. Homos are bad.

Troons are worse.

Troons are just fags in dresses who want to be women, they're fags with an additional layer of mental illness.