The only anime I've seen them praise is FMA due to the non-sexualization of female characters, which is a fucking revelation to me because Winry has always been subtly sexualized. FMA also has a female character who is literally the embodiment of lust. It seems like SJWs overlook all that because of Hawkeye.
There's nothing subtle about Winry's sexualization. Also, Winry's grandma, who's an Always Right font of wisdom, says literally this in plaintext: "men have to go on adventures and women have to wait for them, this is how it should be".
(For context, Winry was being a cunt at the time, complaining how it was
so much harder for her to wait for Edward in a Ghibli-esque village than for Edward to risk his life in the military every day.)
Hawkeye fails the basic SJW feminist purity test of having her own agency, and she never gets over it. (From a sane feminist point of view, she's a good character because it's obvious how fucked up she is, with chips on both her shoulders and sexual tension, but the purity test demands a Strong Independent Woman role model and she ain't that at all.) Maria Ross, a better female role model, gets very little screen time.
Lust is actually fine. She's like Circe in European Renaissance culture or Satan in some "heretical" offshoots of Christianity and Islam - a person whose job is to punish people for sins while being guiltless of those sins. (In contrast, Greed is greedy, Envy is a catty bitch, Gluttony is a fat re'tard who eats everything and everyone for black comedy, Sloth is too lazy to live, etc.) In-universe, she looks the way she does because that's how the main villain, a man, imagines the anthropomorphic personification of lust (muh heteronormativity!!!), and even that look is not fanservicey by contemporary or modern standards.
However, she IS the only female villain and happens to be sex-themed. Both "woman = sex" and "sex = evil" are implications the woke crowd wouldn't have normally let slide.
But every contradiction between the morals of FMA, plaintext or implied, and SJW ideology -
in fact, let's list some:
Aryan supremacy as an objectively true fact, and an Aryan protagonist,
fat representation (evil subhuman fat re'tard Gluttony),
"nonbinary" representation (evil subhuman catty bitch Envy, it's even pronounced "enbi" [homunculi have English names in the original]),
black representation (a thief who steals a disabled kid's treasure, several characters with exaggerated minstrel show lips),
slit-eyed proxy Chinese people,
proxy Middle Eastern people being turned into living bombs (the fuck),
no gay relationships [note: it's messed up how fangirls insist on gay-shipping a man who has a loving wife and daughter],
gay jokes (a nelly fag with makeup, a huge muscular guy with girly SFX sparkles),
"woman looks like a man" visual gags that troons like to get offended by,
most interesting characters are white; FMA is a story about genocide that focuses on the inner lives of the perps and ignores the victims
- pales in comparison to the character Kimblee. In art that deals with genocide, a very important theme is the distribution of collective culpability and guilt. In FMA, it's that guy who personally holocausted all the innocent brown people. SJWs should be foaming at the mouth about how a cheap shortcut this is something something dubya iraq rape of nanking. Instead... *crickets*. And the best part? He's awesome through and through. Exemplary. He makes genocide great again. Usually, such characters are somehow hypocritical or rotten from the inside and the lesson is "don't be fooled by appearances", but Kimblee is brutally honest, and when he dies, it turns out even his soul - unlike the souls of innocents! - is made of pure undiluted awesome. Hail Kimblee.
TL;DR FMA is not politically correct, and anyone who thinks otherwise is as exceptional as the return of Halley's comet.