Why are so many queers commies?
- Iniciador del tema RybenZ999
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 18 de Dic, 2019
The Right/Capitalism don't cater to every demand of theirs, so they move to the Left/far-left ideologies to get what they want. Doesn't really matter since the vast majority of Western lefties are pacified LARPers.
Mothra1988
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Mayo, 2021
The media only focuses on retards in leftwing coastal enclaves. The rest of the country doesn't exist to them. The straights that live there also have retarded opinions or the places wouldn't be the hellholes they currently are because that's what they vote for.
- Registrado
- 6 de Abr, 2022
It kind of reminds me of how someone explained the difference between communism and marxism.
Communism being an authoritarian collectivist ideology, and marxism being "Ruthless criticism of all that exists," in Marx's own words.
Karl Marx was a misanthrope who wanted to burn shit down and was an all-around poor excuse of a human being. He simply saw communism as a means by which he could bitch and moan about the current society he lived in.
Someone did mention earlier in this thread that what neo-marxism does is shift the conflict away from class warfare towards other power struggles, like that based on ethnicity, culture, sex, and even alternative lifestyles.
Queer theory is yet another means by which people can vent their spleen at society. They are filled with anger over the fact that heterosexuality is the default mode (and is for a damned good reason). They resent the fact that most people aren't naval-gazing retards who entertain impractical delusions like being born as the wrong sex. While I disagree with James Lindsay on a lot of things, he described very eloquently how a lot of left wing ideologies, like feminism, communism, or even queer activism, has a sort of Gnostic ideology at their very core. A belief that the powers that be, like God or society, is inherently evil and needs to be overthrown. A sort of Truman Show Delusion so ingrained, even evidence against their beliefs, or any opposition whatsoever, is only proof that the right-wing Demiurge is trying to stop them.
Basically, like communists or Marxists, queers are miserable coomers with an irrational, burning hatred towards society for not affirming them every second of the day. Like communists/marxists, they want to completely revamp society to their arbitrary whims.
Communsim, marxism, queer theory, etc appeals to pretty much everyone who hates society and humanity, regardless of economic class. Regardless of the fact that their degenerate lifestyles aren't even compatible with communist beliefs.
They just want to fight against society and even nature itself purely for the sake of fighting against society and nature. It's the only thing that gives their boring lives any meaning.
Communism being an authoritarian collectivist ideology, and marxism being "Ruthless criticism of all that exists," in Marx's own words.
Karl Marx was a misanthrope who wanted to burn shit down and was an all-around poor excuse of a human being. He simply saw communism as a means by which he could bitch and moan about the current society he lived in.
Someone did mention earlier in this thread that what neo-marxism does is shift the conflict away from class warfare towards other power struggles, like that based on ethnicity, culture, sex, and even alternative lifestyles.
Queer theory is yet another means by which people can vent their spleen at society. They are filled with anger over the fact that heterosexuality is the default mode (and is for a damned good reason). They resent the fact that most people aren't naval-gazing retards who entertain impractical delusions like being born as the wrong sex. While I disagree with James Lindsay on a lot of things, he described very eloquently how a lot of left wing ideologies, like feminism, communism, or even queer activism, has a sort of Gnostic ideology at their very core. A belief that the powers that be, like God or society, is inherently evil and needs to be overthrown. A sort of Truman Show Delusion so ingrained, even evidence against their beliefs, or any opposition whatsoever, is only proof that the right-wing Demiurge is trying to stop them.
Basically, like communists or Marxists, queers are miserable coomers with an irrational, burning hatred towards society for not affirming them every second of the day. Like communists/marxists, they want to completely revamp society to their arbitrary whims.
Communsim, marxism, queer theory, etc appeals to pretty much everyone who hates society and humanity, regardless of economic class. Regardless of the fact that their degenerate lifestyles aren't even compatible with communist beliefs.
They just want to fight against society and even nature itself purely for the sake of fighting against society and nature. It's the only thing that gives their boring lives any meaning.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 31 de Dic, 2018
Narcissism.
Why isn't reality the way I want it just because I want it that way? Obviously, it's an elaborate conspiracy against me. There couldn't possible be a rational reason it is, because I can't see what it is, I mean, I want it to be different. And yet it's not.
Communism/Marxism/Queer Studies/Twitter/Fascism/etc. all tell the same message: It's true, an evil conspiracy has imposed every flaw of reality onto you. You can defeat this conspiracy if you simply will it hard enough. And if the Good Guys (which is you, plus everyone who thinks exactly like you so they're not like real disgusting people with flaws just extensions of your perfect self) just will it hard enough they will defeat the Bad Guys and the endless utopia will begin as reality is refashioned in the Good Guys flawless image.
Being a victim in real life is terrible, it's very traumatic and you want it over and your every natural desire is to escape and overcome it. But they twist the "victim" role into one of angelic purity and thus imbedded with absolute moral authority. Since there are only two allowed classes (Rule of the Sith), the powerful class is the class which claims victim status. The narcissist turn often expresses the victim class as the center of attention of the oppressor. All Nazis are thus "obsessed" with the Jew, all TERFs with the trans women, etc. They even invert dehumanization to where the "hate" is now that the person is too human and the oppressor can't stand it. In reality, historically, the oppressor classes don't even think of the oppressed, they're a feature of the world not an obsession that drives every thought until the object of hatred is finally gone. (Let's turn to the Nazis again since they're the ur example, yes, they hated the Jews but it wasn't just because they hated them randomly instead they constructed an elaborate story to create a utilitarian reason the community needed to be "defended" from the Jews. Pure random hate doesn't get you very far beyond sociopaths.) Look at how often they're unable to resist claiming that their haters really are just sexually obsessed with them, the purest form of narcissism.
The idea some things simply are is not allowed because reality exists purely to serve me and my desires. You say it's nature and nature is more powerful than me? I say I shall change it, nature has never seen anything like me. (Also nature most likely shares my intent and will agree to do as I wish.)
The narcissism even extends to how they "learn" these ideologies, in that they don't. The queer/Twitter Marxists don't read Marxist works let alone the history of it because they feel they already know it innately. So they are never confronted with the idea that Marx/communism demands forced labor by all for the collectives goals not your own. If they are, then they simply "improve" on it by writing that stuff out or simply "find" that the collectives goals are always their own and never opposed to them. Sure, that collapses an already flimsy structure even more but you're again making a mistake, you forget they can will the structure to stand and bear the weight of the entire utopia.
To slightly reword Hayek in a Socratic direction:
"The curious task of [learning] is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."
"If man is not to do more harm than good in his efforts to improve the social order, he will have to learn that in this, as in all other fields where essential complexity of an organized kind prevails, he cannot acquire the full knowledge which would make mastery of the events possible. He will therefore have to use what knowledge he can achieve, not to shape the results as the craftsman shapes his handiwork, but rather to cultivate a growth by providing the appropriate environment, in the manner in which the gardener does this for his plants. There is danger in the exuberant feeling of ever growing power which the advance of the physical sciences has engendered and which tempts man to try, “dizzy with success”, to use a characteristic phrase of early communism, to subject not only our natural but also our human environment to the control of a human will. The recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him against becoming an accomplice in men’s fatal striving to control society – a striving which makes him not only a tyrant over his fellows, but which may well make him the destroyer of a civilization which no brain has designed but which has grown from the free efforts of millions of individuals." - also Hayek.
Why isn't reality the way I want it just because I want it that way? Obviously, it's an elaborate conspiracy against me. There couldn't possible be a rational reason it is, because I can't see what it is, I mean, I want it to be different. And yet it's not.
Communism/Marxism/Queer Studies/Twitter/Fascism/etc. all tell the same message: It's true, an evil conspiracy has imposed every flaw of reality onto you. You can defeat this conspiracy if you simply will it hard enough. And if the Good Guys (which is you, plus everyone who thinks exactly like you so they're not like real disgusting people with flaws just extensions of your perfect self) just will it hard enough they will defeat the Bad Guys and the endless utopia will begin as reality is refashioned in the Good Guys flawless image.
Being a victim in real life is terrible, it's very traumatic and you want it over and your every natural desire is to escape and overcome it. But they twist the "victim" role into one of angelic purity and thus imbedded with absolute moral authority. Since there are only two allowed classes (Rule of the Sith), the powerful class is the class which claims victim status. The narcissist turn often expresses the victim class as the center of attention of the oppressor. All Nazis are thus "obsessed" with the Jew, all TERFs with the trans women, etc. They even invert dehumanization to where the "hate" is now that the person is too human and the oppressor can't stand it. In reality, historically, the oppressor classes don't even think of the oppressed, they're a feature of the world not an obsession that drives every thought until the object of hatred is finally gone. (Let's turn to the Nazis again since they're the ur example, yes, they hated the Jews but it wasn't just because they hated them randomly instead they constructed an elaborate story to create a utilitarian reason the community needed to be "defended" from the Jews. Pure random hate doesn't get you very far beyond sociopaths.) Look at how often they're unable to resist claiming that their haters really are just sexually obsessed with them, the purest form of narcissism.
The idea some things simply are is not allowed because reality exists purely to serve me and my desires. You say it's nature and nature is more powerful than me? I say I shall change it, nature has never seen anything like me. (Also nature most likely shares my intent and will agree to do as I wish.)
The narcissism even extends to how they "learn" these ideologies, in that they don't. The queer/Twitter Marxists don't read Marxist works let alone the history of it because they feel they already know it innately. So they are never confronted with the idea that Marx/communism demands forced labor by all for the collectives goals not your own. If they are, then they simply "improve" on it by writing that stuff out or simply "find" that the collectives goals are always their own and never opposed to them. Sure, that collapses an already flimsy structure even more but you're again making a mistake, you forget they can will the structure to stand and bear the weight of the entire utopia.
To slightly reword Hayek in a Socratic direction:
"The curious task of [learning] is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."
"If man is not to do more harm than good in his efforts to improve the social order, he will have to learn that in this, as in all other fields where essential complexity of an organized kind prevails, he cannot acquire the full knowledge which would make mastery of the events possible. He will therefore have to use what knowledge he can achieve, not to shape the results as the craftsman shapes his handiwork, but rather to cultivate a growth by providing the appropriate environment, in the manner in which the gardener does this for his plants. There is danger in the exuberant feeling of ever growing power which the advance of the physical sciences has engendered and which tempts man to try, “dizzy with success”, to use a characteristic phrase of early communism, to subject not only our natural but also our human environment to the control of a human will. The recognition of the insuperable limits to his knowledge ought indeed to teach the student of society a lesson of humility which should guard him against becoming an accomplice in men’s fatal striving to control society – a striving which makes him not only a tyrant over his fellows, but which may well make him the destroyer of a civilization which no brain has designed but which has grown from the free efforts of millions of individuals." - also Hayek.
- Registrado
- 24 de Ago, 2014
1) Both are manifestations of Fuck-You-Dadism. You'll see most of them are outspoken atheists as well.
2) As many of you have pointed out, both Marxism and Queer Theories are examples of Conflict Theories, pitching the in-group of "victims" against the outgroup of "oppressors". They also believe in a teleology that the oppressors will be eventually completely, decidedly vanquished (instead of a more likely scenario that the two groups coexist in an uneasy balance). This "triumph over evil" narrative is very attractive.
Feminism is the Conflict Theory of choice if a woman isn't ready to yeet her teets yet, and indeed most Second and early Third Wavers are at least sympathetic to Communism. Indeed in Feminism you can see how Conflict Politics evolve: Second Wave was the last time when feminists believed that men will be made redundant by reproductive technologies; by the Third and Fourth wave, Feminism is chiefly about conspicuous consumption of the female identity, so by that point Feminism is in perfect harmony with Capitalism. Same goes for western communism: by the 90s, communists are all about branding and identity, and they no longer pretend to care about the downtrodden workers in the Third World, and will gladly consume whatever group signifiers that Capitalists are eager to peddle.
Hence the acolytes of modern Feminism or Queer Theory (which doesn't even had a phrase in which it was at odds with Capitalism) have the best of both worlds: they can pretend to be righteously indignant to the Capitalist status quo, yet continue to enjoy the material privilege the status quo offer them. What is not to like?
2) As many of you have pointed out, both Marxism and Queer Theories are examples of Conflict Theories, pitching the in-group of "victims" against the outgroup of "oppressors". They also believe in a teleology that the oppressors will be eventually completely, decidedly vanquished (instead of a more likely scenario that the two groups coexist in an uneasy balance). This "triumph over evil" narrative is very attractive.
Feminism is the Conflict Theory of choice if a woman isn't ready to yeet her teets yet, and indeed most Second and early Third Wavers are at least sympathetic to Communism. Indeed in Feminism you can see how Conflict Politics evolve: Second Wave was the last time when feminists believed that men will be made redundant by reproductive technologies; by the Third and Fourth wave, Feminism is chiefly about conspicuous consumption of the female identity, so by that point Feminism is in perfect harmony with Capitalism. Same goes for western communism: by the 90s, communists are all about branding and identity, and they no longer pretend to care about the downtrodden workers in the Third World, and will gladly consume whatever group signifiers that Capitalists are eager to peddle.
Hence the acolytes of modern Feminism or Queer Theory (which doesn't even had a phrase in which it was at odds with Capitalism) have the best of both worlds: they can pretend to be righteously indignant to the Capitalist status quo, yet continue to enjoy the material privilege the status quo offer them. What is not to like?
Última edición:
Kiwisee
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Abr, 2021
Because, more often than not, they’re jobless losers who don’t have any valuable skills so they latch on to “queer” and “Commie” as personality traits.
They want others to do work for them, and never think about what they themselves bring to the table. They think they’ll become party members, but they don’t even have the skills nor foresight to be ahead of the very type of people that will rise to power instead; the ruthless authoritarians who have no issues mass executing revolutionaries after the revolution. A revolutionary will always be a liability to a communist government after the revolution, which is why there’s always a night of the long knives after the previous government has been overthrown.
They want others to do work for them, and never think about what they themselves bring to the table. They think they’ll become party members, but they don’t even have the skills nor foresight to be ahead of the very type of people that will rise to power instead; the ruthless authoritarians who have no issues mass executing revolutionaries after the revolution. A revolutionary will always be a liability to a communist government after the revolution, which is why there’s always a night of the long knives after the previous government has been overthrown.
- Registrado
- 5 de Nov, 2018
Because they're lazy and communism is the lazy person's dream, at least on paper.
Everyone gets the same, no matter what you do, so you can do fuck all and you will still get as much as the others.
Even if you do absolutely nothing, someone else will do the job, there are obsessive hard workers in the world, they will pick up your slack.
That's a major reason.
Everyone gets the same, no matter what you do, so you can do fuck all and you will still get as much as the others.
Even if you do absolutely nothing, someone else will do the job, there are obsessive hard workers in the world, they will pick up your slack.
That's a major reason.
- Registrado
- 17 de Mar, 2022
A deep subconscious realization utterly isolated from their conscious minds that they deserve to be forced to do something useful (in a gulag) and/or taken out behind a shed and promptly executed.
IDK how trannies, potheads, and layabouts can look at a philosophy whose murdercoaster-arc through history included disdain for the lumpenproletariat, forced labor, and a whole bunch of other stuff antithetical to the modern web-leftist's degenerate lifestyle & opinions and conclude that it is the philosophy for them.
IDK how trannies, potheads, and layabouts can look at a philosophy whose murdercoaster-arc through history included disdain for the lumpenproletariat, forced labor, and a whole bunch of other stuff antithetical to the modern web-leftist's degenerate lifestyle & opinions and conclude that it is the philosophy for them.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 6 de Nov, 2014
They are dumb fucks who don't know how hard Stalin would have gulaged them.
Mukhrani
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Jul, 2021
Because communism is a dead ideology. It's not a motivating force at all in the world, so like all such ideologies it attracts larpers who would have been scorned by its original practitioners. Libertarians ranting about 'commies' and 'socialism' are tilting at windmills, which is why they never accomplish anything. All of the shit they rightly moan about and condemn is being funded, driven, and supported by what Marx would call 'capital'. But capital is incredibly powerful, and opposing them would take guts and come with costs. So just like 'leftists' tilt at fascist windmills (fascism is also a dead ideology), right wing people fight communist straw men and act like the Berlin wall never fell and all their enemies are marionettes of Stalin's ghost. Journalists refuse to do actual journalism and instead felate the establishment for the same reason. They're cowards who conjure up a specter to fight while real power goes uncontested.
Power Appreciator
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 26 de Jun, 2023
Communism openly advertises itself as an ideology for the "wretched of the earth" - literal biological detritus that in ancient times would be left to die in a forest. First it was the kikes and alcohol fetal syndrome russian peasant niggers with subsaharan IQ, now it's obese dangerhaired faggot freaks and marijuana addicts. Nothing really changes, on a basic level it's still the same target demographic as always
TheSkyrimAddict
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Jul, 2023
Communism, like other forms of collectivism, is only attractive to the weakest members of a society. It gives them the illusion that they *finally* have some power, even if it is only as a collective.
This hive mentality makes them a ridiculously easy bunch to manipulate and control since any deviation from the collective ideology is grounds for exile. Most end up manipulating themselves with extremely immoral, solipsistic beliefs in order to continue being a part of the collective ideology since exile from said collective would shatter the illusion of power that they thought they had.
This hive mentality makes them a ridiculously easy bunch to manipulate and control since any deviation from the collective ideology is grounds for exile. Most end up manipulating themselves with extremely immoral, solipsistic beliefs in order to continue being a part of the collective ideology since exile from said collective would shatter the illusion of power that they thought they had.
- Registrado
- 6 de Abr, 2022
I think Safir brougt up a very good point. While troons do seek power through collectivist ideologies, it also has to do with the fact that sexual degenerates are, more often than not, traitors to their respective countries, and will go for ANY ideology that their respective community sees as the enemy:
Última edición:
Ughubughughughughughghlug
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Mayo, 2019
Marx liked to shove things up his ass.
That's where he found his labor theory of value and dictatorship of the proletariat, he'd forgotten he'd put it there, one day he had a real bad constipation, and he pulled it out.
The gays relate to that
That's where he found his labor theory of value and dictatorship of the proletariat, he'd forgotten he'd put it there, one day he had a real bad constipation, and he pulled it out.
The gays relate to that