Who Gets to Say the F-slur? - Reclaiming slurs can feel transcendent. Without our slurs, the queer community lose our history.

Article / Archive

Content warning: This article contains queerphobic and censored transphobic slurs.

When I first realised I was gay, I refused to say the word aloud.

I would look in the mirror, open my mouth, and I’d swallow all the nervous spit built up only to tuck my head away shamefully. For several months I exclusively told myself I was “homosexual” because it was the one phrasing the kids at my school didn’t use as an insult.

Now, it’s not uncommon for me to toss a slur or two into every couple of sentences I say. I tend to do this exclusively in queer circles, and absolutely away from professional or family environments. I like to spice it up a bit, not just the typical ones you’d expect like homo, queer, f*g, but some classics too, sprinkling in a “fairy” and a “poof” when you’re digging for something more colourful to express your exasperation.

It’s a delicate act and a consistent discourse as to what measures we take before saying slurs. The first barrier is deciding which terms fall under this banner. The next is deciding who gets to say them, and who gets to hear them. Then there’s intention.

How much fire do you have in your heart when you speak that word?

When we dig into the trenches of intersectionality, we find a beautiful kaleidoscope of a historically problematic lexicon with a variety of intonations. The concept of slurs is a fascinating one, because the severity of a slur changes so drastically depending on its context: who is saying it, who is receiving it, how do these two groups identify, who is around to hear it, do these parties know the context, and what is the intent?

Take this string of hypotheticals and wear it like a pearl necklace: everyone in the LGBTQ+ community gets to say “queer”, and so does everyone else, as long as it’s said without malice on the tongue. My parents don’t like to because their context for the word from when they were young is one that’s inherently derogatory, yet my context suggests it to be a purely objective term, referring broadly to the umbrella of non-heterosexuality. “Queer” is one of those infamous ‘reclaimed’ slurs, though that also depends on who you talk to.

I can say “f*g”, and whilst I can also say “f*ggot”, those terms come with different weights. One can be a fun jab at another queer who expresses love for their same-sex partner, but the other always holds a little heavier in the heart. We don’t use that one as often.

With a precursory consent check, I can say “d*ke” to some femme-aligned individuals. Drag queens love this one, which gets optically messy when they’re aligned with the traditional identity of ‘men dressed as women’. Bulldagger, which is a shortening of the phrase “bulldagger d*ke”, follows a similar set of rules. What does surprise me is how few people my age know what “bulldagger” means. For reference, a “bulldagger” refers to a very butch lesbian, and is another one of those ‘classic’ terms.

I wouldn’t dare use the word “tr*nny”, with the bitterness it harbours in its heart. However, “tr*nny chaser” becomes a much more viable phrase, since it flips who the insult is directed at. Bisexuals have gotten away with a lot, including the privilege of the most expansive dating pool, but they also don’t have any specific slurs for their identity. If anything they hold the simultaneous burden of having these words thrown at them, but also an internal guilt as to whether they truly get to say the words too. Doesn’t it sort of make you sad that they don’t get properly included?

For queers, slurs are a way for us to bond. Reading, our beloved pastime that invokes curatorial insults at others, is our way of building connection. We recognise the ways in which we’re isolated by society and we flip them, we laugh at them, and we choose to not set those parts of ourselves aside, but rather cherish and uplift them.

Of course, in all of these scenarios, my (well-meaning) friends and I will do a quick little check that the other person is okay to hear them before we speak these words into existence. You’d be surprised how well a joke can land even after you light up the runway for landing.

Reclaiming slurs can feel transcendent when it’s done right.

Not every community will be as willing or ready to perform this act, and there is no monolithic approach to how we address slurs. However, without our slurs, we lose our history. The queer community is built on the blood and bones of decades of institutional and personal resistance. We persist in the face of active language repression by both conservative legislators and tone-policers. We absorb invective hurled at us out of passing cars to thicken the skin we carry under our dresses.

When I call myself and my friends “f*ggy” for looking, dressing, or acting a certain way, I do it for the boy in Year Nine who heard his friends call him a “f*g” behind his back and, afraid to speak up, went home to write poetry. Yeah, sometimes I’m so gay that it necessitates a bit of a more descriptive label. That’s my freedom calling. That’s the part of me that is so deeply ingrained in my bones that its remnants will be the last to dissolve when my body is finally collapsed and incinerated.

Besides, there’s no greater joy in life than calling a well-intentioned straight man “fag” and watching him squirm. That’s what I call reparations.
 
Now, it’s not uncommon for me to toss a slur or two into every couple of sentences I say. I tend to do this exclusively in queer circles, and absolutely away from professional or family environments.

I can say “f*g”, and whilst I can also say “f*ggot”, those terms come with different weights. One can be a fun jab at another queer who expresses love for their same-sex partner, but the other always holds a little heavier in the heart. We don’t use that one as often.
I hope they know that when THEY say it to each other, that gives others validity TO say it as well. If you don't want people saying a slur, don't appropriate it into your own communities or speech. It doesn't work like that.
 
I have authorized myself to use the faggot word. I have also given myself nigger clearances. I shall ensure that the usages of faggot and nigger are responsible and necessary. Thank you for your concern, William Winter.

1548181849002.jpeg
 
I've been saying this for years and years now.

The main reason you never see movements to destigmatize words and symbols such as nigger or the swastika despite how much good it would do for society as a whole to take away the power from those words, is niggers and jews would lose billions of dollars in revenue from lawsuits, activism, and the ability to strong arm corporations into doing anything they want by simply spray painting a slur on the wall of their own business or home.

Entire industries exist to monetize words like faggot. If you get into a fight with a gay person, all they have to do is claim you said faggot at some point, and now it's a hate crime and they can end your life and career legally. It's also why the left keeps endlessly expanding the umbrella of slurs.
 
I have authorized myself to use the faggot word. I have also given myself nigger clearances. I shall ensure that the usages of faggot and nigger are responsible and necessary. Thank you for your concern, William Winter.

Ver archivo adjunto 7134897
That's not the author, that's some random guy in Florida. Publication and author are based in Australia.

Train and study until then leave it to the pros.
 
I'm bi and I'm giving everyone who reads this comment a pass to call anyone they like a shirt lifter, Australian batsman, fag, faggot, fudge packer, fairy, confirmed bachelor, friend of Dorothy, bumboy, rent boy, flamer, batty boy, poof, fruit or any other gay slur you feel like on one condition



If you ever meet this limpwristed faggot you call him every one you know in a row
 
No, I don't think we should use the word, and I'll tell you why. Because faggots have gotten used to it, that's why! Hell, they like it now. It's like when you're growing crops and you strip the soil of its nutrients and goodness and then you can't grow anything. You gotta rotate your homophobic slurs. Now I know it's hard because "faggot" just rolls off the tongue the way semen rolls off a faggot's back, but we cannot let that be a crutch. Especially when there are so many fine substitutes: bugchaser, sissy, poof. I say the next time you gonna call an alphabet person a faggot, you call that pansy a fudge-packer instead.
 
I get to say them all, to whomever I want.
 
Who gets to say faggot? Where I live, everyone. As with any so-called "slur", whether you should actually say it or not depends upon the situation and your own judgement. Not a difficult concept.
 
That's not the author, that's some random guy in Florida. Publication and author are based in Australia.

Train and study until then leave it to the pros.
A Muck Rack page threw me off. It's weird though that a Sarasota, Florida man is being credited towards contributing to an Australian university student paper.

Screenshot_20250325_151921_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20250325_151312_Brave.jpg
 
A Muck Rack page threw me off. It's weird though that a Sarasota, Florida man is being credited towards contributing to an Australian university student paper.

Ver archivo adjunto 7135483
Ver archivo adjunto 7135474
I suspect AI is behind that Muckrack profile. Common enough name, accidental profile merge.

The pooner's instagram links back to Honi So it. Sarasota guy works in tech and has no journo credits on his linkedin. The BMJ Diabetes journal William Winter is yet a third person with same first, last.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo