US White House condemns ‘cruel and unacceptable’ posts about Interior spokesman - Activist Chaya Raichik and the @libsoftiktok account she created criticized Interior spokesman Tyler Cherry, an LGBTQ rights advocate. Is there anyone not a crossdressing faggot in the Biden admin?

White House condemns ‘cruel and unacceptable’ posts about Interior spokesman
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Timothy Puko
2023-10-08 21:48:25GMT

ltt01.jpg
From left, Tyler Cherry, Michael Vazquez and Jamie Citron attend a Pride celebration hosted by Vice President Harris and second gentleman Doug Emhoff in June. (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images/GLAAD)

The White House on Sunday condemned a conservative social media activist for ridiculing an openly-gay Interior Department official on the site X, describing her posts as “cruel and unacceptable.”

Chaya Raichik, who created the @libsoftiktok account on X, formerly known as Twitter, sparked a debate online this week after posting and reposting several times about Tyler Cherry, Interior’s principal deputy communications director. The posts appeared to criticize his appearance, referred to him as one of the “total weirdos” the Biden administration has hired, laughed at photos of him in a dress that the New York Times published in a piece on his wedding, and reposted another message that called him a “radical leftist.”

In addition to his work at Interior, Cherry is part of a queer DJ collective pushing for a more inclusive LGBTQ nightlife scene in Washington. He had joined the Biden administration during its first weeks in 2021, and previously worked in Democratic politics in Arizona and at the liberal watchdog group Media Matters for America, according to his X and LinkedIn profiles.

The White House called Cherry an “invaluable member of our team,” according to a statement first obtained by the Advocate, an LGBTQ+ magazine. Interior declined to comment.
“No one should be targeted simply for being themselves,” the statement said. “This is an administration that believes to our core in the principle that out of many we are one — and we are proud that the people who serve in it reflect those values as well.”

Raichik and the @LibsofTikTok account have nearly 3 million followers combined, and have been frequently cited by Tucker Carlson and other right-wing media figures. After gaining a large Twitter following in 2022 after calling on openly-gay teachers to stop teaching, Raichik began criticizing transgender medical treatment of young people at hospitals.

Raichik and the @libsoftiktok account did not respond to direct messages on X seeking comment, including questions about whether the posts targeted Cherry for his appearance. On Thursday afternoon, Raichik and the @libsoftiktok account posted several pictures of Cherry, referring to him as the “queer spokesperson” for Interior and, in one reply, asking “How many sets of pronouns do you think he has?”

The @libsoftiktok post also included screenshots of years-old political posts that appeared to be from Cherry’s personal account from before he joined the Biden administration. The old posts criticized former president Donald Trump, along with other members of his administration, and commented on racism and other social issues.

It spurred other replies that called Cherry a disgrace or a “diversity hire.”

Several commenters on X came to Cherry’s defense, questioning why he would attract attention in the first place.

Raichik’s posts came less than a week after Interior Secretary Deb Haaland posted a video of herself with self-described queer environmentalist and drag queen Pattie Gonia, discussing the cultural importance of Stonewall National Monument, which commemorates the LGBTQ civil rights movement.

Some critics, including tennis star Martina Navratilova who is a lesbian, questioned why the interior secretary would appear with the performer. Navratilova suggested that dressing in drag amounts to a “pathetic parody of women,” though some drag performers have been active in LGBTQ rights.

---

1710044304519954674.png
ltt02.jpg
ltt03.jpg
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1710044304519954674 (archive.ph)
 
Because Biden-backed genderspecials have such stellar track record.
Ver archivo adjunto 5397226

And it is glaringly obvious that LibsOfTikTok picks on more than Cherry's looks. It is the journoroach who brought his look to the fore. If the left have found no problem calling Trump "The Orange Man" for years, I can't see how calling a cross-dressing man "weirdo" cruel or unacceptable.
when I found out this dude stole random peoples luggage frequently at airports with his fucking dog masked gimp goons I had to question "where the fuck is superman when you need him".
 
At least this tranny isn't responsible for nuclear waste disposal as the last one.

Lmao, another shit I can bookmark when someone says that "America would certainly beat China/Iran/Russia bro".
I'm so fucking sorry for any kiwi who is or has a loved one in the armed forces or the federal government, you're fucked, sorry lol.
 
Interior declined to comment.
This is fucking telling and probably the only relevant point in the article. His own fucking department isn't saying a fucking word. :story:

Probably because he doesn't actually do any work and mostly gallivants around for PreP hookups while parasitically absorbing resume "experience" simply for existing with an official title.

But they know they can't say that.
 
When I was working retail in the 90s there were a lot of gay guys, some pretty flaming, and none of them crossdressed at all. I don't just mean at work (there were dress codes then, unlike today) but after hours or ever. They'd show off pics of themselves on vacation or whatever just wearing normal man clothes, if a little bit flashy.

Where did all these Corporal Klinger tier crossdressing freaks come from in the last 5 years?

I wonder this too. I knew a lot of gay dudes through the work I did pre-2010 and even the most flaming feminine ones dressed like human beings. I don't think I'm suffering from fake nostalgia when I remember that pre-awokening, people who were weirdos owned being weirdos. They were like "Hah yeah, I definitely dress like a freak! Oh well." People were not this bizarre form of completely humorless. What happened? Where did all of these absolutely insane people come from? Why did this aesthetic that prizes the hideous emerge?

I had only seen the Weird Al Beetlejuice photo of this guy and didn't get the outrage. But wow! What a weirdo.
 
he kinda looks like brandon buckingham

or more like brandon buckbrokenhan
 
I wonder this too. I knew a lot of gay dudes through the work I did pre-2010 and even the most flaming feminine ones dressed like human beings. I don't think I'm suffering from fake nostalgia when I remember that pre-awokening, people who were weirdos owned being weirdos. They were like "Hah yeah, I definitely dress like a freak! Oh well." People were not this bizarre form of completely humorless. What happened? Where did all of these absolutely insane people come from? Why did this aesthetic that prizes the hideous emerge?

I had only seen the Weird Al Beetlejuice photo of this guy and didn't get the outrage. But wow! What a weirdo.
It's baffling. I can only assume that this current brand of crossdresser weirdos are not so much "into men" as "into anything and everything perverse, and homo men are more likely than anyone else to put up with it." The gaymos I knew back in the day would do things like snark on people for wearing out of season pocket squares or "clashing blacks"- there are apparently green blacks and red blacks and maybe blue blacks, I can't remember- they would rip these guys' clashing, tacky getups to shreds.
 
I wonder this too. I knew a lot of gay dudes through the work I did pre-2010 and even the most flaming feminine ones dressed like human beings. I don't think I'm suffering from fake nostalgia when I remember that pre-awokening, people who were weirdos owned being weirdos. They were like "Hah yeah, I definitely dress like a freak! Oh well." People were not this bizarre form of completely humorless. What happened? Where did all of these absolutely insane people come from? Why did this aesthetic that prizes the hideous emerge?

I had only seen the Weird Al Beetlejuice photo of this guy and didn't get the outrage. But wow! What a weirdo.
I agree with you. I've known many people with odd style, or involved in subcultures, and only the retarded weren't completely aware of the image they were projecting. That was the entire point! And you're telling me this dude with an ugly perm, looking like a homunculus made from Weird Al's jizz socks doesn't know what he looks like?

I'd dislike this new "queer" cult a smidgen less if they weren't the most obnoxious, humorless scolds in existence. They're just so tedious.
 
Is there any HUITE man in the Biden Administration who doesn't suck cock and take it in the ass? Fucking christ what an embarrassment.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo