Which factors increase/decrease prevalence of homo/transsexuality in population and why? - And which races/classes troon out the most?

[Boldizar]

From what I know:
1. Prisons and similar all-male spaces are breeding grounds for a specific kind of homosexuality, which later leaks outside those institutions into normal society. Being "prison gay" is most common among lower classes with higher proclivity for crime. In male-on-male rape, the perpetrator usually comes from poorer, more criminal population than the victim.
2. Trooning out (both MTF and FTM), from anecdotal experience, is most common among least criminal, high income populations (both classes and races). MTF troons in particular tend to be white/east asian and nerdy.

 

[Axiom.]

MTF troons in particular tend to be white/east asian and nerdy.

This explains your behavior by a long shot then.

 

[Divine right to rule]

The prison-gay thing is pretty much just an US thing. Other countries don't have that.

 

[Crypt Kicker]

I'd say having a good and positive father figure in life should heavily decrease the chances of going faggot.

 

[Schwarzwald]

Gay males are created by rape and early exposure.

Transsexuals are caused by autism and social contagion.

 

[Boldizar]

The prison-gay thing is pretty much just an US thing. Other countries don't have that.

They do. At even greater extent, with great sophistication and complicated justifications so they can claim not being gay.

This explains your behavior by a long shot then.

But I got called a wetback for disagreeing with an autistic sandnigger @Dojima's Dragon
And haven't trooned out, not planning to do so.

 

[Nero Fiddled]

Schools and internet.

 

[Boldizar]

Schools and internet.

Are schools sex-segregated in your country?

 

[Nero Fiddled]

Are schools sex-segregated in your country?

They are mostly "co-ed".
The issue over the last few years has been teaching LGBT nonsense as part of the curriculum.

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

Homosexuality also breeds in Churches because clergymen view women as sinful and evil. So of course the only choice is to take it out on men. It doesn't matter if they ban it publicly, the horror stories of clergy raping boys are legend. Also the Greeks and Romans have it, but they are much less common.

As for trooning out it depends on what stage of the Jewish Mind Virus infection in your country is in. Because for all we know the Jews believe that the perfect human is neither male nor female. You see very little troons in East Asian countries like China or Japan because the Jewish Mind Virus doesn't quite affect them as much as England or America. Also they call the Jewish Mind Virus "Christianity", but we all know that Christianity came from Jews.



(Why are they fucking dressing like women??)

 

[Boldizar]

As for trooning out it depends on what stage of the Jewish Mind Virus infection in your country is in. Because for all we know the Jews believe that the perfect human is neither male nor female.

Source?

You see very little troons in East Asian countries like China or Japan because the Jewish Mind Virus doesn't quite affect them as much as England or America.

Thailand and Iran have a shit ton of troons on their own. Jews are not necessary for trooning out.

(Why are they fucking dressing like women??)

Because those are archaic clothes from a different era where this was considered male clothing

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

Source?

I remember I've read it from the Charles Freeman book "the Closing of the Western Mind" but I can't seem to find back the exact paragraph.

Because those are archaic clothes from a different era where this was considered male clothing

Not really, those were pretty much clothing from Medieval queens (or something of that sort).

Also don't forget that there was a Shabbos Goy Roman Emperor called Elagabalus, his patron god is some sort of Syrian Sun-God version of Baal and that guy also loved crossdressing and is batshit insane.

 

[Boldizar]

I remember I've read it from the Charles Freeman book "the Closing of the Western Mind" but I can't seem to find back the exact paragraph.

Something about tikkun olam? Making all people into one godlike being?

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

Something about tikkun olam? Making all people into one godlike being?

Not quite that. IIRC it's something coming from Saint Paul (or whoever that actually is) and it doesn't have even a shred of occult shit mixed in it.

 

[Boldizar]

Not quite that. IIRC it's something coming from Saint Paul (or whoever that actually is) and it doesn't have even a shred of occult shit mixed in it.

Elaborate

 

[Do Not Touch Me Pls]

Elaborate

The book had a whole chapter about Saint Paul and if I remember correctly he believed that the perfect human being is not men or women. I don't really remember how exactly is it worded like and I can't seem to find it back but I dead remember reading about this.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

The way I see it, there's three different layers to the matter
First comes the underlying disposition (call it orientation or dysphoria)
Then comes a number of people who adopt and use an identity label
And then comes a number of people who troon out (pursue medical intervention)
All three of these things are different and I'd argue #2 and #3 are often institutional rather than biological. Governments change incentives and exposure in ways that change how many people interpret themselves through a given framework and how many seek medical shit
Identity frameworks are being shoehorned into public schooling, training requirements, and official materials. From that the number of people who interpret their distress, alienation, or discomfort through troon vocabulary goes up, that will increase trans self-identification rates.
When taxpayers are required to fund specific services or public clinics, the government creates a guaranteed troon market. It's standard incentive economics to see that uptake increases when the cost barrier drops and the infrastructure drops.
Then there's regulatory definitions, like when law or administrative policy redefines terms like "sex" for compliance purposes. Since schools, HR departments, medical systems, etc. operate on risk management, institutions will adjust to minimize liability. Reporting practices and procedures are driven by policy definitions, and these things in turn affect statistics.
Then there's the obvious fact that public conformity to troonery goes up when disagreement has professional and/or institutional risk. This affects how people answer surveys, how clinicians document cases, how organizations classify individuals etc. An apparent consensus can grow without any chance in underlying psychology.
In terms of who troons out the most, the obvious drivers are surgery access, income, insurance coverage, urban concentration of clinics, and social cost tolerance. If you see class differences, the first explanation is access and pathway design. Wealthier populations have fewer logistical barriers to elective medical procedures of any kind.

tl;dr the most powerful factors that increase troon prevalence are institutional (exposure, funding, regulation, liability structures). Get rid of those levers and there's less artificial amplification and standardization of troons through public machinery

 

[The Last Stand]

tl;dr the most powerful factors that increase troon prevalence are institutional (exposure, funding, regulation, liability structures). Get rid of those levers and there's less artificial amplification and standardization of troons through public machinery

That's a lot of words to describe "grooming" and "peer pressure." I want to add the concept of "acceptance" by doing absolutely nothing.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

That's a lot of words to describe "grooming" and "peer pressure." I want to add the concept of "acceptance" by doing absolutely nothing.

If by "peer pressure" you mean that social environments have an influence on how people see and interpret themselves, then yes, that's one factor.
But it's not what I described.
When schools are mandatory, curricula are standardized, funding is compulsory, and regulatory definitions have liability consequences, then that's institutional incentive design backed by enforcement, not just kids influencing each other.
Friends shaping each other's behavior (or even grooming) and a state-funded system embedding a framework into education, medicine, and compliance policy are two vastly different things.
I don't deny that grooming exists and that it is a factor for many, but it's minuscule in comparison to the larger driver in contemporary societies, which happens to be structural. That is, mandated exposure, compelled funding, administrative definition changes, risk management behavior by institutions. Those mechanisms operate even if every single individual person has benign intentions.

 

[VM_]

Because those are archaic clothes from a different era where this was considered male clothing

It's not just about wearing a dress - in ancient cultures you had priests dress up as literal women from head to toe, down to literal castration, since they equated spiritual power with the feminine, so the head priest would larp as the mother goddess that was the head of their pantheon. This was mostly a thing in the Middle East, where goddess worship was rife, like the worship of Ishtar and Cybele. Obviously this died down through the centuries, but vestiges are still there.