Where does ‘homosexuality’ come from?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
"Homosexuals" are known for their hostility to their societies. Among overall behavioral dysfunction like spreading disease and substance abuse.
You straights should probably clean your own room before bitching about anyone else's.

hostility to their societies
Your societies have repeatedly engaged in brutal crackdowns on homosexual populations at times with no other provocation than "Ew, they're icky and my imaginary best friend doesn't like them!" Assuming you're even RIGHT here (which you aren't), a generalized homosexual hostility towards society would be fairly fucking justifiable.

This is full-on retarded threat-narrative spinning. If your society could be dismantled by a tiny fraction of the population in such a manner I'm inclined to think it either had bigger issues elsewhere or it deserved to be dismantled for being such a piece of shit.
 
For what it's worth, Biological Exuberance goes way beyond situational examples and covers long term partnerships as well. It was already mentioned in the book synopsis I linked.

Honestly, I'm not sure if investing time in this conversation will end in anything constructive. The willingness to reject an accumulation of published, peer reviewed research in favor of a subwiki page gives the impression that this is more about asserting an opinion that isn't open to change.
 
For what it's worth, Biological Exuberance goes way beyond situational examples and covers long term partnerships as well. It was already mentioned in the book synopsis I linked.

Honestly, I'm not sure if investing time in this conversation will end in anything constructive. The willingness to reject an accumulation of published, peer reviewed research in favor of a subwiki page gives the impression that this is more about asserting an opinion that isn't open to change.
If you're not having fun you're probably doing it wrong. That being said, leave it up to just about any Internet forum to have that one guy who looks at a pile of publications written by people who know what the fuck they're talking about and counter unironically with "YEAH WELL MY FAVORITE WIKI SAYS YOU'RE WRONG."

The Goons were right about one thing. The Internet makes you stupid.
 
I think being gay is some sort of ingrained orientation and folks are probably born that way. I don't view being gay as a mental illness.

I've heard there's research indicating that male homosexuality is correlated to lowered in-utero exposure to androgens, and higher exposure to estrogens, in the 2nd trimester . Lesbianism is correlated to higher in-utero exposure to androgens in-utero, and lowered exposure to estrogens, during that same part of gestation. Haven't looked into it, since endocrinology really isn't my bag.

To the OP: gay is definitely a result of your mom.
 
If society wanted me dead just because they didn’t approve of my consensual partner, I’d probably be hostile towards it as well

Of course, fags can't be trusted to behave themselves absent of either being told to channel themselves in the closet or get married.

>You straights should probably clean your own room before bitching about anyone else's.

I'm sure you get indignant at pointing out Negro and/or Muslim criminality too.

Also:
>straights

Your societies have repeatedly engaged in brutal crackdowns on homosexual populations at times with no other provocation than "Ew, they're icky and my imaginary best friend doesn't like them!"

A fag and a fedora. How appropriate.

Assuming you're even RIGHT here (which you aren't), a generalized homosexual hostility towards society would be fairly fucking justifiable.

The fag cries out as he strikes you. And the LBGRHWOK representation in substance abuse and HIV infections is well recorded.


This is full-on exceptional threat-narrative spinning. If your society could be dismantled by a tiny fraction of the population in such a manner I'm inclined to think it either had bigger issues elsewhere or it deserved to be dismantled for being such a piece of shit.

The homosexual is alienated from society just as the Jew is. Absent of pressure in modernity he will work to subvert it.

For what it's worth, Biological Exuberance goes way beyond situational examples and covers long term partnerships as well. It was already mentioned in the book synopsis I linked.

Honestly, I'm not sure if investing time in this conversation will end in anything constructive. The willingness to reject an accumulation of published, peer reviewed research in favor of a subwiki page gives the impression that this is more about asserting an opinion that isn't open to change.

>homosexual pairbonding in species without heterosexual pairbonding
>the species still has two sexes with them depending on mating to maintain said species

Sure man, totally not Leftie twaddle ala those in "academia" who think Niggers ever were relevant to actual civilization, male dominance was invented at agricultural, and/or insist the Greeks at their peak unconditionally accepted faggotry.
 
>homosexual pairbonding in species without heterosexual pairbonding
>the species still has two sexes with them depending on mating to maintain said species

Sure man, totally not Leftie twaddle ala those in "academia" who think Niggers ever were relevant to actual civilization, male dominance was invented at agricultural, and/or insist the Greeks at their peak unconditionally accepted faggotry.

It includes homosexual pairbonding in species with heterosexual pairbonding as well. It's not mentioned in the summary because it's not as much of a hook, but I can tell you that it's included because... you know, I read the book.

I personally don't think a lesbian bird that regularly has intercourse with its female mate is suddenly heterosexual if it leaves once or twice to get impregnated by a male. Especially if it still exclusively raises the baby with its female mate. Humans do this too, but we still call them gay.

This is the last bait I'm taking with you. Calm down and stop using greentext format if you expect to be taken seriously. Twitter accounts and religious subwikis are not credible sources.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo