What's the funnier site? DeviantArt or Twitter?

[Luminous47]

We had lolcows emerge from both sites, Tyler Bowie for Deviant and puppychan for Twitter for example... but which site has funnier lolcows to you?

 

[Jewthulhu]

Twitter is just trannies and political spergery. At least the mess of bad art and suicidal furries from DA was funny.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Deviant Art because bad fetish art can always give you a few giggles.

 

[Luminous47]

Twitter is just trannies and political spergery. At least the mess of bad art and suicidal furries from DA was funny.

True, politics isn't that funny. Though the DAdiots like Tyler Bowie and the Loud House fanbase is fucking funny. Oh yeah, and the "depressed" users there too. LOL.

 

[Yamamura]

I feel like Twitter can only circumstantially be funny on accident, like when someone is sperging out, but it requires some sort of outside catalyst to assist it along. However DA is more organically funny, because you have a bunch of weirdos who are all just innocuously eccentric, while not being political.

Also everyone on Twitter more or less follows the same type of thinking where they all seem to want to conform in a certain way to think and behave like each other. While DA has a wider variety of weirdos who are all more unique in the ways they are weird and allows them to be more creative.

So I would say DA is probably funnier.

 

[Luminous47]

I feel like Twitter can only circumstantially be funny on accident, like when someone is sperging out, but it requires some sort of outside catalyst to assist it along. However DA is more organically funny, because you have a bunch of weirdos who are all just innocuously eccentric, while not being political.

Also everyone on Twitter more or less follows the same type of thinking where they all seem to want to conform in a certain way to think and behave like each other. While DA has a wider variety of weirdos who are all more unique in the ways they are weird and allows them to be more creative.

So I would say DA is probably funnier.

This is probably the best post in this thread. Everything you wrote aligns with the thoughts in my head, good job!

 

[RW 1995]

deviantart is funny. twitter is annoying

 

[Neil]

Deviantart has no effect on the real world and politics, so clearly, deviantart.

 

[Bongocat]

Twitter has a very, very, very small number of accounts with people that say entertaining things. The rest of it is just a vast hellscape of unfunny, depressing garbage.

 

[Coelacanth]

Deviantart. It's only on sites like DA where you can find ten or twenty autists who have a really bizarre fetish like shoving fingers in USB ports and make hundreds upon hundreds of copy/paste crappy MS Paint art of their favourite characters fulfilling their sexual desires.

 

[Lina Colorado]

Deviant art. Twitter is just sad.

 

[Solid Snek]

DeviantArt.

DA is fun and hilarious, like a giant party that nobody was invited to, but they showed up anyway and now home owner is helpless to make all the drunk furries and dancing bondage enthusiasts leave.

Twitter, on the other hand, is depressing and miserable, like a church in Puritan New England that's had all its doors and windows barricaded, and inside, the miserable, pinch-faced parishioners sit, huddled and cold and dead to everything in the world except their fat old preacher, shouting that the Day of Judgement is at hand.

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

Devientart. Just reading Twitter will raise your blood pressure.

 

[Town Drunk]

Twitter. Nothing like seeing an echo chamber purity spiral and cancel each other. Oh you posted that you had eggs for breakfast, let me tell why this offends me as X oppressed group and seeing the apologies.