What to know about Healey’s proposed candy tax - Candy is considered a grocery in Massachusetts and therefore not currently subject to sales tax

Link and archive

By Ross Cristantiello

Sweet treats could soon cost more in Massachusetts.

When Gov. Maura Healey announced her $62 billion budget proposal earlier this month, she floated the idea of removing the sales tax exemption on candy.

In Massachusetts and most other states in the U.S., most groceries are not taxed. Right now, “candy and confectionery” is included in that tax exemption. Under Healey’s proposal, “sugar and sugar products” would still be exempt, but taxes would be levied on candy. Candy costing $3.50 or more and sold through a vending machine may be subject to sales taxes under current law.

Healey addressed the idea at a press conference earlier this week after touring the Burlington Department of Public Works.

“I’ve gotta figure out a way to pay for snow plows,” she said, per State House News Service. “It’s an idea. I propose ideas in a budget. And we’ll see what the Legislature does with all of this. But nobody likes taxes.”

The revenue from a candy tax would be extremely modest in the grand scale of the state budget. Instead, the idea is likely meant to improve public health.

“This is expected to raise something like $25 million and remember this is a $60 billion budget, so this is a rounding error in terms of actual revenue needed. So I think they are thinking of a kind of public health mission here,” Evan Horowitz, executive director of the Center for State Policy Analysis at Tufts University, recently told WBUR.

As of 2020, candy was excluded from sales tax exemptions in 15 states, according to the Tax Foundation. This includes nearby states like Maine and New York. In some states, like Illinois, whether a treat has flour in it determines how it is taxed.

In many states, sugary beverages like soda are not considered groceries and are thus subject to taxes. The Boston City Council recently discussed the topic of imposing new taxes on sugary drinks to improve public health and generate extra revenue. Residents are skeptical.

A hearing will take place in the future, and any home rule petition passed by the City Council would still need to win approval from state lawmakers on Beacon Hill.
 
Makes no sense. When was the last time you bought an item of candy costing $3.50 or more out of a vending machine? Never, for this kid. Buy candy at the commissary - no tax - or online.

Doubt MA would get much of anything in the way of taxes, might not even get enough to cover administering the tax.
 
Última edición:
I originally come from a land with no sales tax. It was nice when things cost what they said they did.
 
Makes no sense. When was the last time you bought an item of candy costing $3.50 or more out of a vending machine? Never, for this kid. Buy candy at the commissary - no tax - or online.

Doubt MA would get much of anything in the way of taxes, might not even get to cover administering the tax.
The real question is why the state is looking to boost tax revenue when it already passed that millionaire's tax and has raked in untold amounts of cash with all the weed dispensaries. Meanwhile, the state auditor - a position created by a ballot question - is getting jerked around and fucked with by her own party.
 
“I’ve gotta figure out a way to pay for snow plows,” she said, per State House News Service. “It’s an idea. I propose ideas in a budget. And we’ll see what the Legislature does with all of this. But nobody likes taxes.”
The money is not going to snow plows. It is going to go to lefty causes and illegals.

That aside it will be no where near what they expect to raise because people will do what people did when the soda tax in PA happened: Go to NJ and get soda then bring it back.

That means you will just get kids with the tax. Kids who are probably from poor families. Nice job.

This is the problem with Democrats. Instead of saying, "Wow we have some money issues let's look at how we are spending" they look around to find more ways to squeeze.
 
The money is not going to snow plows. It is going to go to lefty causes and illegals.

That aside it will be no where near what they expect to raise because people will do what people did when the soda tax in PA happened: Go to NJ and get soda then bring it back.

That means you will just get kids with the tax. Kids who are probably from poor families. Nice job.

This is the problem with Democrats. Instead of saying, "Wow we have some money issues let's look at how we are spending" they look around to find more ways to squeeze.
They don't tax pop in Jersey? That's actually kind of cool. Granted, it's the only cool thing about them, but still.
 
They don't tax pop in Jersey? That's actually kind of cool. Granted, it's the only cool thing about them, but still.
They also have low tobacco taxes, which the mob has taken advantage of by running cigs into NYC.

Buy Newport Menthols wholesale in Jersey, sell loosies in NYC at markup, Profit!
 
They also have low tobacco taxes, which the mob has taken advantage of by running cigs into NYC.

Buy Newport Menthols wholesale in Jersey, sell loosies in NYC at markup, Profit!
People from Massachusetts go to New Hampshire to buy cigarettes because you can no longer buy menthols in MA and it's cheaper to get cartons there.
 
Don't forget about the tea smugglers.
Tea and a whole lot of other things the UK really, really wanted us to buy only from the London merchants (thanks mercantilism!), and at an insane markup for the privilege of buying from the London merchants. One of the big reasons the English came in and tossed out all of the domestic judges and customs officials was because the smugglers were handing them a portion of their cargoes to ignore everything, and one of the big reasons everyone got pissed was because everyone in the colonies was directly profiting from cheap tea and manufactured goods at the expense of the Exchequer.
 
This is the woman who is currently trying to pass a 20% income tax increase (on everyone) and assigned a judge that used to eat her pussy to the state supreme court a few days ago.
You are referring to Gabrielle Wolohojian. The Armenian population in Massachusetts is an understated fifth column. I'm not kidding when I say to never trust them. They look like Greeks, behave like Jews, but have the competence level of drunken Russians.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo