What is the "Gay Agenda"?

[Feline Darkmage]

my schedule haha

Spoiler: serious answer

I think you hit the nail right on the head, it's basically what you said and also sometimes "the evil plan of the gays to get special rights from the government" etc etc. Is the term actually still being used? I feel like that whole issue has died down by now since the big topic of trans people kind of stole the spotlight.

You can't trick someone into turning gay any more than you can trick someone into being straight. A dude can identify as gay all he wants, he'll discover the truth about himself after he sucks enough dicks and no harm will be done.

Like @nier said the trans agenda is a much more apt topic of discussion. While the question of who you find attractive is rather easy to solve, the question of your "gender identity" is not because, contrary to what SJW tards will try to cram down your throat, you cannot feel a gender. It's easy to convince a girl who enjoys boy activities that she's trans if you use the right language.

Eh, the really hardcore fundies consider the tranny agenda the same thing as the gay agenda because they're mentally slow when it comes to processing the distinctions between the two groups of people.

And also just kind of slow to process things in general.

 

[ICametoLurk]

Eh, the really hardcore fundies consider the tranny agenda the same thing as the gay agenda because they're mentally slow when it comes to processing the distinctions between the two groups of people.

And also just kind of slow to process things in general.

It's the same thing since trannies are just mentally ill gay men.

 

[DeadwastePrime]

this is the obvious answer

 

[Joan Nyan]

It's the same thing since trannies are just mentally ill gay men.

Many of them are mentally ill straight men.

 

[Steve Mayers]

The only ones who really believe in the gay agenda are fundies. They're convinced that a gay person on TV will turn their children gay. Fundies are the right's version of SJW's.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

this is the obvious answer

@bearycool, this man stole your notebook and is posting pics of it on the online.

 

[bearycool]

@bearycool, this man stole your notebook and is posting pics of it on the online.

Damn, and that has all of my hookup numbers and my plans to convert every straight man in existence into my gay lover. It also has coupons for brunches too, and those are extremely valuable to a gay man!

 

[ICametoLurk]

Reminder that the Gay Agenda is responsible for the Emoji movie.

As Leondis is gay, he connected to Gene's plight of "being different in a world that expects you to be one thing," and in eventually realizing that the feeling held true for most people, Leondis has said the film "was very personal".

 

[Morose_Obesity]

To learn the answer, you must drink deeply from the sacred CumGutters of San Francisco. There, you will absorb the full power of Liberace's ghost.

 

[melty]

I thought the gay agenda was to turn kids gay so that gays (who are all pedos of course) could rape them, or something.
I think that's what it originally was, back when people thought gay people were evil pedos and perverts because so many were in the closet they didn't realize perfectly normal ppl like Tom down the street were gay.
Now it's just a completely meaningless term.

 

[invalid]

I see this term thrown around a lot on the comments of news articles about characters in some form of media that have been outed as gay. And one of the main things I hear is that the creation of a brand new character who happens to be gay is a part of the dreaded "gay agenda", which is out to "pollute the minds of kids" or some bullshit like that. I'm prompted to believe that it's just typical right-wing fundie Christian nonsense that they use to disguise their bigotry (apologies if I come off as SJWish) against homosexuality, but I was hoping to get some more insight.

Well people who are gay are supposed to be 10% of the population. But thanks to my consumption of media, my perception tells me over 40% of people are probably gay.

 

[AnOminous]

Well people who are gay are supposed to be 10% of the population. But thanks to my consumption of media, my perception tells me over 40% of people are probably gay.

156% of people are gay, and the rest are total fags.

 

[ɐɔᴉlǝƃu∀]

You fancy whoever you fancy and owe nobody an explanation. Sometimes people assume the wrong sex of the person they fell for. The notion that a guy who falls for a trans woman would be in any way "homosexual" is nonsense. Neither is a woman, attracted to butch dykes, really a "lesbian" IMO.

Categorizing people into artificial sexualities is divisive, sexist and elitist and serves no purpose other than to fuel the flames of intolerance and bigotry.

 

[Joan Nyan]

Well people who are gay are supposed to be 10% of the population.

It's actually like 2%, the commonly cited 10% figure was a guesstimate by noted pedophile Alfred Kinsey based on his experience researching sexual behaviors and orientations. Since he was researching deviant sexual behaviors, he naturally interacted with a much higher than average proportion of gays.

 

[Pikimon]

It's actually like 2%, the commonly cited 10% figure was a guesstimate by noted pedophile Alfred Kinsey based on his experience researching sexual behaviors and orientations. Since he was researching deviant sexual behaviors, he naturally interacted with a much higher than average proportion of gays.

Nobody knows the exact number, the estimated range is 3-10% of the population based on multiple studies done since Kinsey.

 

[Mysterious Capitalist]

I've heard that gay men find "corrupting" a straight man into a gay man with the power of their dick extremely appealing and arousing.

So I guess the gay agenda is getting off

 

[invalid]

If this thread is any indication then I suppose the conservatives aren't looking so crazy now

 

[friedshrimp]

^Yup, the Tumblr/Twitter/internet crowd has pretty much been open with the whole "show your kids they're gay ASAP"

 

[escapegoat]

Neither is a woman, attracted to butch dykes, really a "lesbian" IMO.

Categorizing people into artificial sexualities is divisive, sexist and elitist and serves no purpose other than to fuel the flames of intolerance and bigotry.

Ah, yes. The tolerance and inclusiveness of some random asshole categorizing lesbians as not really lesbians. So brave, you are.

 

[Caesare]

There is a gay agenda that the gay mafia uses to control the hip hop industry.