What do you know about Hegel?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Divine Power

Unleash the natural order
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
13 de Ene, 2022
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) was a German philosopher and one of the most influential figures in Western philosophy. His work shaped major intellectual traditions in Europe and laid the foundation for many later philosophical movements, including phenomenology, and postmodernism.

Dialectic Process


Hegel is most famous for his idea of the dialectic, a method of understanding progress in thought and history through contradiction and resolution. This is often (simplified, but not exactly how Hegel framed it described as:

Thesis > an idea or starting point
Antithesis > a contradiction or opposition to the thesis
Synthesis > a higher-level resolution that overcomes and includes both

This process repeats, driving development forward.
 
Hegel was a fart huffing academic who believed the was the first human being to discover the concept of compromise, and gave it a fancy name to try to claim as his own invention.
 
I know he's a lightweight compared to David Hume.

Other than that, the dialectic is just the scientific method generalized to fit into philosophy.
  1. Form hypothesis
  2. test it with experimentation
  3. revise hypothesis with new understanding from observations
  4. repeat experiment
  5. Repeat endlessly.
Notably, Popperian falsification claims the aim of #2-3 should be to disprove the hypothesis. It's presumed that you'll find something which disproves the hard form of your hypothesis, causing a redo of the hypothesis, more experimentation, etc. But even if you don't, you can't claim your hypothesis is true, only that you failed to falsify it.

Hegel's antithesis presupposes there's a direct opposite to your hypothesis to consider, or at least a strong enough opposition to be considered a rejection. Or at least, a strong enough objection to advance things and form synthesis. But I always thought this was a weak point, supposing that there is both a clarifying antithesis and a viable synthesis to reach. What about the category of hypothesis that either need no refinement, or have no sufficiently clarifying antithesis? I admit I haven't read enough to see what Hegel things of that situation. He's smart enough that it surely occurred to him, I just don't know his response.
 
Every single philosopher that ever lived was a complete waste of human potential and so is every single person studying these fucking retards just to find a way to rephrase "it is what it is".
 
1749663955079.webp
 
Atrás
Top Abajo