ArgonianVoter
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Feb, 2025
Charlie Kirk was a spokesperson for CNP Action, the political arm of the "Council for National Policy", which functions as a hub for a nationwide network of conservative activists and donors. whose members are very hush hush, I personally find Council for National Policy pretty creepy in general. But I think it's more important to put time into context, Charlie Kirk was outspoken against censorship and died while we had our own massive kosa bill in the works which was cosponsored by both parties along with other shit like block beard and I have no doubt he would be against that.
and wouldn't it be the ideal time to take him out? when you have a scapegoat and can point at the terrorist sympathizers that are the democratic party and its followers? Look I don't know what happened, I wasn't there, i'm not a very important person but I do think the possibility of such a conspiratorial action is there. what do you think?
and wouldn't it be the ideal time to take him out? when you have a scapegoat and can point at the terrorist sympathizers that are the democratic party and its followers? Look I don't know what happened, I wasn't there, i'm not a very important person but I do think the possibility of such a conspiratorial action is there. what do you think?
