That's concerning. I hoped that the end user would have more control over who to fix, not the devs. If it had worked as advertised, I had planned to fix a bunch of niggers, mutts and ugly, mannish women in games into aesthetically pleasing members of the White race.
Graphical advancements past the PS1 were a fucking mistake.
God, I hate modern vidya so much. They insist on adding these completely unnecessary and pointless additions to game engines that do nothing but demand you have state of the line hardware to run them. What is the point of this? vidya characters looks slightly more "realistic"? Who gives a fuck. Gameplay and story for AAA games have stagnated since 2015 and the only improvements we see are miniscule graphical iterations.
Get ready for a smug response on the next DF Direct, specially from that faggot Alex, he seems to slurp NVidia cock the most.
Totally optional
Why wouldn't this be optional? Not every system will handle it well if at all given what else the player might be running simultaneously. And DLSS5 won't be coming to older GPUs like the 3000 series.
A second, dedicated 5090 needed. So ~$8500 worth of video cards with current market prices AND a shitload of RAM (~$950) and a ~1200W PSU or thereabouts, and those prices are STILL accelerating with no end in sight. About $10,000 worth of computer, all told.
I suspect that yes, that is part of it. It hits a lot of wins for them:
I think those are just good graphics benchmarks, like how I'd constantly see Rise of Tomb Raider in benchmarks despite not hearing anyone ever play it.
I am certain that these Videogames companies and Nvidia are colluding together to force people to buy higher end GPUs by making the videogame companies create their videogames and have them have bad optimization and ultraphotorealistic graphics and unnecessary tiny visual details and animations that nobody asked for.
