Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

[PrinceofAllCucks]

wtf

Assumedly, the brief counts as a supplement, basically counting as an index of the information.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Assumedly, the brief counts as a supplement, basically counting as an index of the information.

I'm pretty sure this just means that they added some of the documents that were missing from Chupp's court.

 

[DuckzillA]

I'm pretty sure this just means that they added some of the documents that were missing from Chupp's court.

That's a big yikers if that is the case.

 

[AnOminous]

Incidentally this is the first filing in the case I've looked at that isn't ugly as sin.

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=dee8172b-47bd-482d-a2f3-5974933d9b2f&coa=coa02&DT=Motion&MediaID=5e7a96c2-ed98-4c9d-8f32-7065d36ebaf0

 

[DuckzillA]

Incidentally this is the first filing in the case I've looked at that isn't ugly as sin.

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=dee8172b-47bd-482d-a2f3-5974933d9b2f&coa=coa02&DT=Motion&MediaID=5e7a96c2-ed98-4c9d-8f32-7065d36ebaf0

Well, it's an unopposed motion for a 24hr extension. so... not much involved luckily.

 

[FGO-Professor-P2PBTW]

Incidentally this is the first filing in the case I've looked at that isn't ugly as sin.

http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=dee8172b-47bd-482d-a2f3-5974933d9b2f&coa=coa02&DT=Motion&MediaID=5e7a96c2-ed98-4c9d-8f32-7065d36ebaf0

I got excited for a moment, damn you.

 

[AnOminous]

Well, it's an unopposed motion for a 24hr extension. so... not much involved luckily.

I was talking about the format and the proper use of fonts and small caps.

 

[Binary Code]

I was talking about the format and the proper use of fonts and small caps.

The preferred Nomenclature is Asian American.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Is this the proper search for finding case records? Seems like it can be bookmarked and open directly instead of having to search by hand each time: http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-19-00394-CV&coa=coa02

 

[AnOminous]

Is this the proper search for finding case records? Seems like it can be bookmarked and open directly instead of having to search by hand each time: http://www.search.txcourts.gov/Case.aspx?cn=02-19-00394-CV&coa=coa02

That's what I use.

 

[Adach_Ame]

Cross-posting.

Apparently Mike Dipshit has got his hands on it.

Mike "Already Over 2020" Dunford on Twitter: "I will give you one sne…

archived 20 Feb 2020 09:08:05 UTC

archive.today

Edit:

Mike "Already Over 2020" Dunford on Twitter: "I'm going to stop readi…

archived 20 Feb 2020 09:18:12 UTC

archive.today

 

[diskboomer]

Cross-posting.

He’s likely confusing unsworn declarations with the affidavits, and it’s funny he says they don’t understand Khan. Since he himself is constantly wrong, and has never handled a case.

The SAP was never withdrawn or struck from the record, even after Lemontwink wrote ex parte letters to Chupp asking he struck it.

 

[TheClappening]

He’s likely confusing unsworn declarations with the affidavits, and it’s funny he says they don’t understand Khan. Since he himself is constantly wrong, and has never handled a case.

The SAP was never withdrawn or struck from the record, even after Lemontwink wrote ex parte letters to Chupp asking he struck it.

If I remember, Khan v Van Der Linden because it set the precedent for actual malice when only the defamer and the defamed had knowledge of an incident, and for tossing out a TI claim because the contract breacher couldn't be shown to have breached because of the defendant's actions.

Actual malice only matters if Vic is a public figure (and good luck with that if Dr. Luke, who appeared on Saturday Night Live, isn't a GPPF or a LPPF), but if he is, Khan has Marchi and Rial dead to rights in regards to the hotel rape story and the hair pull story. As for TI... well that's covered by both Vic's and Slatosch's declarations.

Also, the panel of VDL v Khan had Sudderth and Gabriel, two of the judges that slapped Chupp with a writ of mandamus, in In Re Dakata Directional Drilling. I'm honestly really curious which judges drew the short straw for a case about Chinese cartoons.

 

[Adach_Ame]

Cross post again. Seriously these dipshits love to tease this fuckery while everyone else is waiting to read it themselves, it's kind of irritating.

@Spectre_06 Looks like Mike Dipshit is noticing you and spinning it in a way that only supports his fuckery of a shit commentary. Seriously what is with these dipshits and playing this whole sniping game, first it was PULL, now it's Twitter.

Mike "Already Over 2020" Dunford on Twitter: "Also - here's a screens…

archived 20 Feb 2020 12:08:13 UTC

archive.today

 

[mindlessobserver]

How is it Dumbford has the documents and we don't? What sort of sorcery does he have access too?

 

[ErbBetaPatch]

How is it Dumbford has the documents and we don't? What sort of sorcery does he have access too?

T-Greg.

 

[Francis York Morgan]

How is it Dumbford has the documents and we don't? What sort of sorcery does he have access too?

This is assuming he's being honest and not talking out his ass like Dunford normally does.

 

[Kosher Salt]

So let me get this straight... the brief was e-filed, electronically served on all of the parties, and the defendants promptly leaked it to their law twit lapdog.

 

[diskboomer]

So let me get this straight... the brief was e-filed, electronically served on all of the parties, and the defendants promptly leaked it to their law twit lapdog.

Seems like it. Low T says he’s too busy to look at it, it looks like it got distributed to the rest ASAP.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Low T says he’s too busy

There's the first LawTwitter lie of the day.