Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
But... but guns. They're a tool you can use to solve any problem... Like a fucking crazy ex-wife.Texas.......You're a fucking shithole. Congrats on being one of California's septic tanks.
God fucking damn. Dallas is a fucking shithole, California's carpet baggers will fucking ruin the entire goddamn nation at this rate. Yeah my "thoughts" on Vic's case went out the window if there are Juries that think this is fine.
Is this relevant? Sorta. Does it prove that Texas having that "tough-guy" image is a load of horseshit? Absolutely.
You CAN dream! But you can't spell.That's me being authistic but...
I can dream!
But... but guns. They're a tool you can use to solve any problem... Like a fucking crazy ex-wife.
I'm gonna be watching A&H for the next couple of days to see if this guy ends up there in a double murder-suicide.
That's me being authistic but... I want Lemon to file his discovery demand on BHBH for any communications not with Vic, about Vic.
I want that to be filed, Chupp to Chupps and not squash it, and Ty to not oppose.
And then file his discovery result with a simple " You will find attached any and all communications requested that do not fall into client-attorney privilege as Exhibit A". And the Exhibit A is an empty white page.
I can dream!
There's gonna be a lemon party when old dick finally catches Nicky with his hand in the GoFundMe
Ver archivo adjunto 982445
https://archive.fo/2ZmQp
TCPA arguably applies to every legal motion. Ethics complaints, ETC.How would TCPA apply to this?
Here you go.
"Documents, and communications (including emails, texts, or any other type of communication) between You and Chris Slatosch, Chuck Huber, Stan Dahlin, and/or Rekieta, concerning the Litigation, Vic Mignogna, any of the Defendants, Defense counsel, and/or the affidavits executed by Chris Slatosch, Chuck Huber, and Stan Dahlin in the Litigation. 2. Documents, and communications, concerning Kameha Con 2019 that reference or discuss Mignogna, Defendants, Slatosch, or Rekieta. "
IB4 this is all just a stalling tactic so that the clock gets ran up, and they argue that because so much time has passed the window for appeals is gone.
He spelled it right, it was just spelled in Mike TysonBut... but guns. They're a tool you can use to solve any problem... Like a fucking crazy ex-wife.
I'm gonna be watching A&H for the next couple of days to see if this guy ends up there in a double murder-suicide.
You CAN dream! But you can't spell.
Wouldn't the answer to practically everything be "Objection, privileged?"They're trying to depose the other fucking legal team.
Literally everything. Nick can lean on privilege as a reporter, ty can lean on privilege as Vics lawyer. I feel everyone is glossing over exactly who is supposed to speak on what here, and that's weird to me? Its like a couple KickVic people said "Oh, they want to depose X" or "Oh, that's not covered under privilege" and everyone just forgot. I'm looking at the bird for that one.Wouldn't the answer to practically everything be "Objection, privileged?"
All of this, every single bit, is privileged.
Wouldn't the answer to practically everything be "Objection, privileged?"
Maybe not all of it but while they may argue otherwise, the way they've phrased it explicitly asks for material that is clearly privileged. Usually the burden is on the party asserting a privilege to present a log of what they claim to be privileged but in this case the burden should be on the party requesting extremely unusual discovery to justify why it isn't privileged.
Of course this is Chupp World.
Being cunts.As someone mentioned above / in the main thread, they seem to be trying to go around privilege by asking everything EXCEPT the communications between Vic and Ty. But apparently there's a different privledge involved between client-attorney privilege? Work-something?
Outside of stupidity, what's their angle? Hope that Ty is too stupid to say no? Hope this distracts or upsets Ty into making a mistake or delaying the appeal to a point they're past some cutoff they can claim?
As someone mentioned above / in the main thread, they seem to be trying to go around privilege by asking everything EXCEPT the communications between Vic and Ty. But apparently there's a different privledge involved between client-attorney privilege? Work-something?
Work product which may or may not apply. I think Ty's opening position should be something on the order of "fuck off."
en.wikipedia.org
They literally don't get to ask for this shit and if Chupp lets them its absurditySo to be clear... Work product is privileged, right? But it might not apply to everything they're asking?
Ver archivo adjunto 983002
Work-product doctrine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
They literally don't get to ask for this shit and if Chupp lets them its absurdity
So to be clear... Work product is privileged, right? But it might not apply to everything they're asking?