- Registrado
- 17 de Mayo, 2019
Monica and Ron are guaranteed to die on the hill of appeals and get dragged back in.
FUNi I'm not sure on. How do you drag FUNi back in?
FUNi I'm not sure on. How do you drag FUNi back in?
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Iniciador del tema 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 6 de Mayo, 2019
By being appealed? They are all doomed on the hill of appeals except Marchi. The only question is on what counts.
pearlslam
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Mayo, 2019
- Registrado
- 8 de Mayo, 2019
So, instead of settling with the actual person claiming you've commit a crime, you just want Vic to validate your story by issuing an apology to someone who might not even remember the interaction ever happening (if it even did)?
Seems like Emmett doth protest too much.
- Registrado
- 28 de Ago, 2018
Jeffrey Hellberg was one of the attorneys on the AHC appeal.
"AHC raises two arguments that challenge our jurisdiction over this appeal. First, in AHC’s second issue on appeal, AHC argues that the March 6 order granting Alan’s motion to dismiss was a final judgment and that the April 14 final judgment is therefore void because it was signed after the trial judge had lost plenary power. If AHC is correct that the March 6 order was a final judgment, it necessarily follows that AHC’s and Dinah’s notices of appeal were untimely filed, and we must dismiss the appeal. Second, in its motion to dismiss Dinah’s cross-appeal, AHC argues that Dinah’s notice of appeal was untimely in any event because her notice-of-appeal deadline began to run either on January 18, 2012, when her motion to dismiss was supposedly denied by operation of law, or on January 30, when the trial judge signed the order granting AHC’s nonsuit of its claims against Dinah."
So they tried to argue that the defendant's cross-appeal was filed in an untimely manner and should be dismissed. The appeals court argued that if that were the case and the 06 March ruling were the actual ruling and the 30 April one was not, then the entire appeal should be dismissed as it is late and gay. They also argue that the ruling on 06 March is the ruling that removed plenary power from the trial court, and thus as no decision on sanctions or fees had been in said ruling then there is nothing to pay out (remember how Lemoine tried to say that Vic could at least appeal the sanctions and fees if he appealed after the ruling on those, but not the entire TCPA?).
"AHC also relies on our Straza decision, in which we reaffirmed the rule that an otherwise final judgment is final even if it does not address court costs. See 124 S.W.3d at 406 (citing Thompson v. Beyer, 91 S.W.3d 902, 904 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002, no pet.)). Straza is distinguishable because it concerned only an omission of an award of court costs from an otherwise final judgment. The March 6 order in this case, by contrast, not only failed to award costs but also set a further hearing on a pending request for “damages and costs,” meaning in this context costs, attorneys’ fees, and sanctions. The pendency of Alan’s request for attorneys’ fees and sanctions and the March 6 order’s reservation of those matters for future litigation make this case more analogous to cases such as Crites, Unifund, and Interhealth. "
They tried to argue that a final judgment is final, period, end of discussion, even if it does not say final judgment on the paperwork...but they argued the exact opposite when trying to dismiss Vic's notice of appeal as early and hetero.
"AHC raises two arguments that challenge our jurisdiction over this appeal. First, in AHC’s second issue on appeal, AHC argues that the March 6 order granting Alan’s motion to dismiss was a final judgment and that the April 14 final judgment is therefore void because it was signed after the trial judge had lost plenary power. If AHC is correct that the March 6 order was a final judgment, it necessarily follows that AHC’s and Dinah’s notices of appeal were untimely filed, and we must dismiss the appeal. Second, in its motion to dismiss Dinah’s cross-appeal, AHC argues that Dinah’s notice of appeal was untimely in any event because her notice-of-appeal deadline began to run either on January 18, 2012, when her motion to dismiss was supposedly denied by operation of law, or on January 30, when the trial judge signed the order granting AHC’s nonsuit of its claims against Dinah."
So they tried to argue that the defendant's cross-appeal was filed in an untimely manner and should be dismissed. The appeals court argued that if that were the case and the 06 March ruling were the actual ruling and the 30 April one was not, then the entire appeal should be dismissed as it is late and gay. They also argue that the ruling on 06 March is the ruling that removed plenary power from the trial court, and thus as no decision on sanctions or fees had been in said ruling then there is nothing to pay out (remember how Lemoine tried to say that Vic could at least appeal the sanctions and fees if he appealed after the ruling on those, but not the entire TCPA?).
"AHC also relies on our Straza decision, in which we reaffirmed the rule that an otherwise final judgment is final even if it does not address court costs. See 124 S.W.3d at 406 (citing Thompson v. Beyer, 91 S.W.3d 902, 904 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2002, no pet.)). Straza is distinguishable because it concerned only an omission of an award of court costs from an otherwise final judgment. The March 6 order in this case, by contrast, not only failed to award costs but also set a further hearing on a pending request for “damages and costs,” meaning in this context costs, attorneys’ fees, and sanctions. The pendency of Alan’s request for attorneys’ fees and sanctions and the March 6 order’s reservation of those matters for future litigation make this case more analogous to cases such as Crites, Unifund, and Interhealth. "
They tried to argue that a final judgment is final, period, end of discussion, even if it does not say final judgment on the paperwork...but they argued the exact opposite when trying to dismiss Vic's notice of appeal as early and hetero.
diskboomer
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Nov, 2019
Slimy lawyers are slimy. They want it both ways, and this is the guy that apparently raised his voice to Chupp because the fees and sanctions were going terribly for them.
ddlloo
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 18 de Oct, 2018
I wouldn't even call it slimy. Their job is to zealously represent their clients,
It's more a failure of the sheer amount of grey area in the legal system, rather than lawyers.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
ViC iS gOiNG tO OwE mOrE In fEeS bIg tImE!
Todd DuBois on Twitter: "Even if Vic Mignogna were to win his vindict…
archived 14 Dec 2019 20:34:53 UTCarchive.li
Ver archivo adjunto 1052055
No matter what Vic owes at the end of this case, he'll be able to pay it, unlike this worthless fucking walking phallus who will never be out from under his mountain of debt until he dies fat, alone, and hated by even his own family. Wherever Vic goes, he will be greeted by lines of adoring fans. Wherever this fucking bald prick goes, he will be met only by unpaid bills and abandoned children. Die, you piece of shit.
N1bbaN3rd
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Mayo, 2019
This reminds me of that cartoon of Paul Krugman and Ben Bernanke paying each other 20 grand to eat shit, and then bragging about how they've expanded GDP and created jobs. Let's see if I can rustle it up...........ah here it is:
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Those are economists, though. Economists exist to make lawyers feel better about themselves because at least lawyers aren't the absolute worst people in the world, just the second worst.
- Registrado
- 7 de Mayo, 2019
My respect for law twitter is barely above my respect for pedophiles
which is none at all obv
- Registrado
- 5 de Ago, 2019
I think either today or tomorrow will be the day.
My transcript sense is tingling.
My transcript sense is tingling.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
I actually honestly have less respect for law twitter than pedos. The MAPs who escaped from tumblr are actually better people.
- Registrado
- 31 de Ago, 2017
Yeah, clear and specific is so hard to define. Defendants clearly and specifically defaming plaintiff is SOO last year.
Why doesn't Vic just declare himself guilty and drop the lawsuit!?!? NOT THAT I'M MAD OR ANYTHING!
I mean, Bernanke DID eat shit, didn't he? I'm happy if his puppeteer ate-shit by-proxy, but this is a settled matter of fact.
- Registrado
- 10 de Mar, 2019
Or the junior's hourly rate is lower and they're suddenly worried about how much this costs.
- Registrado
- 7 de Mayo, 2019
Wouldn't it be funny if Wick Phillips folded as a direct consequence to this case
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Emmett Plant is absolute garbage. Nobody even knows who this motherfucker is and yet here he is again, saying, well something. Nobody has any idea who this guy is and yet here he is, making noise. Fuck this guy, whoever he is.
- Registrado
- 11 de Sep, 2019
I swear to god I hope this soy faggot gets deposed if the appeals go in vics favor. We all know he was relieved when the case was dismissed and is now shitting pants terrified that it might come back.
AnOminous
IS THIS DIVINE INTELLECT? OR IS IT NIGGERLICIOUS?
Retired Staff
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
He is absolutely a piece of shit who has desperately tried to involve himself at every stage in this case despite literally having no relevance to it at all. Nobody has any idea who this guy even is!
- Registrado
- 11 de Sep, 2019
That is why I want to get to know him a bit more via deposition. Never a good idea to lie in those after all.