Article Archive
South African inventor Sonette Ehlers explains, 8 September 2005, how her anti-rape female condom works.
Javier Villamor — July 8, 2025
Germany is facing an alarming rise in rape cases. In just five years, the number of reported assaults has increased by 49.5%, surpassing 12,000 per year. And yet, the institutional and academic response does not point towards a serious analysis of the causes or reforms that would effectively protect women. Instead of addressing the factors driving this violence—such as massive and uncontrolled immigration—the reaction is a grotesque distraction: proposing “trap condoms” with internal spikes designed to injure the attacker’s penis.
The idea, recycled from an old South African invention called Rape-aXe, consists of a vaginal device that a woman can wear for self-defense. If she becomes a victim of rape, the device activates, inflicting pain and injuries on the attacker and also facilitating later medical identification. Sociologist Julia Wege of the Ravensburg-Weingarten University of Applied Sciences and physician Urs Schneider of the Fraunhofer Institute for Health Technology in Stuttgart have announced a study in which they intend to investigate technical aids against sexual violence, which includes this one.
What is presented as an innovative and empowering measure is a surrender of the state. It is the tacit admission that the streets are unsafe, that the judicial system offers no protection, that the borders are open, and that women must prepare to defend themselves alone—as if they lived in a war zone.
Are we meant to believe that turning the female body into a booby trap is the solution to the surge in rapes in Germany? Is this what Europe has come to: getting used to imported barbarism and finding creative ways to endure it?
Because the problem has a face, an origin, and a pattern, the statistics are clear, even if many media outlets and politicians insist on hiding them: in a large part of the rape and sexual assault cases in Western Europe, the perpetrators are not German, French, or Swedish nationals. They are young men from cultures that do not share Europe’s values of respect for women, of civilization, or legality. The same men who have been brought in by the millions under the suicidal umbrella of multiculturalism, promoted by Brussels and the globalist elites who have turned Europe into an ideological experiment without roots or common sense.
The rise in sexual violence is no accident. It is the direct consequence of dismantling borders, weakening authority, criminalizing patriotism, and prioritizing the integration of foreigners over the safety of native citizens. And now, because no one dares question the migration dogma, we are offered a spectacle instead: a new device, a new campaign, a new illusion of control—pure window dressing.
South African inventor Sonette Ehlers explains, 8 September 2005, how her anti-rape female condom works.
Javier Villamor — July 8, 2025
Germany is facing an alarming rise in rape cases. In just five years, the number of reported assaults has increased by 49.5%, surpassing 12,000 per year. And yet, the institutional and academic response does not point towards a serious analysis of the causes or reforms that would effectively protect women. Instead of addressing the factors driving this violence—such as massive and uncontrolled immigration—the reaction is a grotesque distraction: proposing “trap condoms” with internal spikes designed to injure the attacker’s penis.
The idea, recycled from an old South African invention called Rape-aXe, consists of a vaginal device that a woman can wear for self-defense. If she becomes a victim of rape, the device activates, inflicting pain and injuries on the attacker and also facilitating later medical identification. Sociologist Julia Wege of the Ravensburg-Weingarten University of Applied Sciences and physician Urs Schneider of the Fraunhofer Institute for Health Technology in Stuttgart have announced a study in which they intend to investigate technical aids against sexual violence, which includes this one.
What is presented as an innovative and empowering measure is a surrender of the state. It is the tacit admission that the streets are unsafe, that the judicial system offers no protection, that the borders are open, and that women must prepare to defend themselves alone—as if they lived in a war zone.
Are we meant to believe that turning the female body into a booby trap is the solution to the surge in rapes in Germany? Is this what Europe has come to: getting used to imported barbarism and finding creative ways to endure it?
Because the problem has a face, an origin, and a pattern, the statistics are clear, even if many media outlets and politicians insist on hiding them: in a large part of the rape and sexual assault cases in Western Europe, the perpetrators are not German, French, or Swedish nationals. They are young men from cultures that do not share Europe’s values of respect for women, of civilization, or legality. The same men who have been brought in by the millions under the suicidal umbrella of multiculturalism, promoted by Brussels and the globalist elites who have turned Europe into an ideological experiment without roots or common sense.
The rise in sexual violence is no accident. It is the direct consequence of dismantling borders, weakening authority, criminalizing patriotism, and prioritizing the integration of foreigners over the safety of native citizens. And now, because no one dares question the migration dogma, we are offered a spectacle instead: a new device, a new campaign, a new illusion of control—pure window dressing.
