USPG2 Regulars vs. TES Regulars (aka Useless Nigger Wars)

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

you mean the argument where your retarded comrade said trump was obese and it was shown very clearly he was wrong and then you retards ignore the actual argument and fling shit around like niggers for 3 pages about not liking AI and completely avoiding the actual argument.

HE'S FAT OBESE AND I WOULD NOT HAVE SEX WITH HIM

 

[General Patton]

Dying on the hill of whether or not Trump is obese is fucking insane.

All I said was that he doesn't look healthy, and that's what made them sperg.

HE'S FAT OBESE AND I WOULD NOT HAVE SEX WITH HIM
Ver archivo adjunto 8485167

LMAO, no fucking way is Trump 224 pounds like that tard keeps claiming.

 

[The Fuck's Going On Here]

Nah, man, that White House physician who didn't reveal Biden's Cancer to the public is totally reliable.

Funny thing is, the physician seems to be going "he's 6'3" and 224 pounds, so not obese (as of April 2025), just really, really fat to be near-obese."
Even then, at that weight and age, he's one big mac away from a massive coronary.

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

All I said was that he doesn't look healthy, and that's what made them sperg.



LMAO, no fucking way is Trump 224 pounds like that tard keeps claiming.

In truth, it's all muscle. He's overweight like a bodybuilder. What a stud.

 

[General Patton]

Funny thing is, the physician seems to be going "he's 6'3" and 224 pounds, so not obese (as of April 2025), just really, really fat to be near-obese."
Even then, at that weight and age, he's one big mac away from a massive coronary.

Oh, yeah, that makes it better, lmao.

What a stud.

Definitely the best example of an American Adonis that all men should aspire to be.

I'm honestly not surprised at this point. ICE act like thugs now.

 

[SBG]

you mean the argument where your retarded comrade said trump was obese and it was shown very clearly he was wrong

If Trump really weighs what was stated then sure he isn't obese. But people are skeptical of him really having a weight as low as 224 or whatever they suggested.

The White House doctors have been exaggerating how healthy he is and Trump even made a point of having them say he was in better shape than Obama. Which wouldn't even make sense given how much older Trump is than Obama. So maybe he had the doctors lie about his weight or just accept whatever he told them. We haven't really gotten stories from the doctors about what it's like giving him those cognitive tests where they ask him to draw a clock or whatever that he uses as evidence of how sharp his mind is.

Though weight thing is a mystery to me since he clearly is out of shape (you don't end up having a waistline like that if you're fit), but then maybe some of it is the effect of tailoring? Or maybe he has extremely little muscle and the fat adds weird fluff in some parts?

People often start looking really weird if they get older while being out of shape, like odd hunchbacks or bellies which do not help make you look attractive. Which is sad when we have Ozempic that we should be forcing on anyone the slightest bit fat until they get back into shape or maybe into anorexic levels as punishment for being too fat in the past.

 

[The Fuck's Going On Here]

LMAO, no fucking way is Trump 224 pounds like that tard keeps claiming.

Honestly, with how fat he is, I don't think you could tell the difference. Either way, he's just the old, white version of Diabeto.

 

[Michael_Jordan_Peterson]

Your only argument is you being implicitly above the need to clarify your badly-put argument about 'miggas' and gun control. Whether it's through race, degree, employment or how Australian you are. I didn't ask for your life story, just address my point mate!

You really wont get him to have an honest argument with you, because he is atleast smart enough to know he wouldnt win. This is the best he can do. Completely avoiding the argument.

 

[Popper Whiting]

What if they're an Aborigine.

Trust me, if they were Koori, Noongar or Murri they wouldn't talk like this nonce.

Your only argument is you being implicitly above the need to clarify your badly-put argument about 'miggas' and gun control. Whether it's through race, degree, employment or how Australian you are. I didn't ask for your life story, just address my point mate!

No. Because there was no flaw in my point. The point I made was not about the circumstances but the complete and utter lack of consistency regarding any stance, and I used gun control as an example. When Bondi happened accounts on here and on other platforms took glee in bragging about how gun control didn't work and being openly pro 2nd admendment. Yet with this latest shooting those same accounts are actively arguing for gun control and against the second amendment. These were migger accounts.

The circumstances between Bondi and this latest ICE shooting in Minneapolis are different, but when it comes to the issue of gun control, you don't get to argue the complete opposite 44 days later. I specifically said my point wasn't about gun control, I wasn't arguing gun control, I was pointing out the complete backflip miggers had concerning gun control. When it was Bondi, they're pro-second amendment because fuck Australia. This latest shooting they're anti-second amendment now because fuck white liberals in Minnesota. That is being inconsistent and having no principles.

The Epstein files are another example. It was a huge issue in the 2024 election, Biden and the Democrats had buried it and Trump, Kash Patel and others promised a full release. Yet when Trump got in power, suddenly it was "there are no Epstein files", then "stop talking about Epstein", then "even though Congress said release the files we're not going to". The position of miggers (unapologetic dick riders of Trump) has changed with every step, to the point we've had people in this thread arguing that technically what Jeffrey Epstein did was not Pedophilia, but Hebephilia, and that isn't as bad and we shouldn't condemn people for it. Complete lack of a solid principle.

There are right wing figures who've held solid positions, Tucker Carlson and MTG, and they've been actively chased out and demeaned by MAGA and the Republican party.

You claiming that because "Bondi and Minnesota were different" itself doesn't debunk the argument I made, and is why your point isn't worth addressing, because you're being fallacious in asserting that because "the circumstances were different" it justifies a complete backflip with miggers concerning the issue of gun control.

Your argument is stupid, retarded and based on what aboutism. Exactly what I'd expect from a dog cunt

 

[Michael_Jordan_Peterson]

All I said was that he doesn't look healthy, and that's what made them sperg.



LMAO, no fucking way is Trump 224 pounds like that tard keeps claiming.

I love the argument is now, all the official data that proves your point is WRONG, only trust my eyes.

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

?utm_source=chatgpt.com

ChatGPT, is Trump objectively fat?

Short answer: there is no fully objective, definitive way to label Donald Trump as “fat”, because “fat” is not a medical or objective category. If you want, I can also explain why BMI is controversial, or compare BMI vs. body-fat percentage in more technical detail.

What would you say to someone posting on Kiwi Farms?

It depends on why you’re engaging, but in most cases the most effective response is not to engage at all.

Understand the environment: Kiwi Farms is structured around mockery, provocation, and escalation. Posts are rarely made in good faith. The incentive structure rewards outrage and reaction, not persuasion or dialogue.

Fuck me, case solved I guess. Fat doesn't exist and you're not posting in good faith, niggerfaggot. God bless ChatGPT for giving me God's truth so I can win an Internet argument.

 

[MazonLabs Recruitment Rep]

"Just kill people."

Oh no, we're in The Purge.

Always have been.

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

We haven't really gotten stories from the doctors about what it's like giving him those cognitive tests where they ask him to draw a clock or whatever that he uses as evidence of how sharp his mind is.

Considering they've slipped up and revealed he does several cognitive tests a year shows you that they're monitoring him closely. You don't do that with someone that's sharp as a tack, despite being old. There's clearly some concern there, but I imagine as long as he keeps it above a certain threshold (ie as long as they can play Weekend at Biden's) they'll likely not go through the trouble of pushing him out. I guess if he really flops in the midterms that threshold can get lower though.

 

[General Patton]

Fuck me, case solved I guess. Fat doesn't exist and you're not posting in good faith, niggerfaggot. God bless ChatGPT for giving me God's truth so I can win an Internet argument.

This is exactly how ChatGPT and AI responds. Which makes me think that fucker said more to sway it more in his argument, because that's how you get it to finally answer.

I love the argument is now, all the official data that proves your point is WRONG, only trust my eyes.

All you did was post ChatGPT. But I get it, blindly believe AI and don't try to notice stuff yourself.

 

[Steak Tartare]

You faggots wanting to play at going to war with the federal government then actually realizing the other side might fight back and crying like pussies when they do isnt "needless suffering" its deserved punishment and long overdue.

It is fucking hilarious how angry leftists get at anyone on the right having a voice. Nothing drives you pussies into a bigger frothing rage.
A rightwing site is one that allows the opinions of both sides to be expressed.
A leftwing site is one that aggressively censors anyone they disagree with.
Fuckin safe space faggots

I love the argument is now, all the official data that proves your point is WRONG, only trust my eyes.

Sir you've been posting in this thread every 10 minutes at this exact level of pissed off for six and a half straight hours

​

 

[MazonLabs Recruitment Rep]

Sir you've been posting in this thread every 10 minutes at this exact level of pissed off for six and a half straight hours

Ver archivo adjunto 8485254​

But if it does that, we'll burn America down!

 

[General Patton]

Sir you've been posting in this thread every 10 minutes at this exact level of pissed off for six and a half straight hours

Ver archivo adjunto 8485254​

He needs to win a really dumb internet argument, alright?

 

[Michael_Jordan_Peterson]

More peaceful protesting. These are your compatriots a bunch of illegal spics waving a foreign flag while burning down cars and obstructing actual tax paying americans from getting to work.

Im sure trying to detain people like this while white liberals are following you around in suvs honking and whistling doesnt pose any risk to the agents.

This is terrorism. Which is what the left has been doing nearly constantly for the past 30 years.

 

[howtohatemyself]

Holy shit, we got there.

You claiming that because "Bondi and Minnesota were different" itself doesn't debunk the argument I made, and is why your point isn't worht addressing, because you're being fallacious in asserting that because "the circumstances were different" it justifies a complete backflip with miggers concerning the issue of gun control.

It's not a fallacious argument; context is everything. The fact you don't see how the same people could have an two different opinions on the presence of guns in, A) a terrorist attack, versus, B) a sovereignty enforcing its laws through the monopoly on violence, is autistic.

I don't know, or have seen, a single 'migger' who is now anti-2nd amendment (read, no-one in America having the right to bear arms) since Minnesota because it's 'white liberals'. What you see as a lack of consistency is people looking at a situation with different circumstances and having a different opinion because context is important. The fuckwits who gleefully went on about Australia's gun control after Bondi, a terrorist attack, still hold a consistent viewpoint if they then say, 'the white liberal shouldn't have had a gun when challenging ICE.' That's not saying he can't have gun, or stand up to the government with a firearm or liberals shouldn't own guns, but maybe it was a stupid idea to challenge the entity that has a monopoly on violence while having an object on your person that could see that violence directed towards you. It's common sense, not an inconsistent view point.

Your argument is stupid, retarded and based on what aboutism.

I think we got to, what, hour four of you what-abouting until this point?

 

[Michael_Jordan_Peterson]

I've even seen the video where one breaks a window and should get in trouble for it. That still doesn't seem like evidence the protesters in general are trying to attack ICE agents rather than just be annoying.

Storming the hotel lobby with a violent mob because they had intel there were ICE agents there is nothing to be concerned about.

Im unconcerned with what the actual peaceful protestors do. Im concerned about what the violent terrorists are doing and the people who support and enable them.