Well, Josh. As Obi-Wan coped after Darth Vader was retconned in being Darth Vader, “it depends on your point of view.”
Sociopaths like to lie but they believe that there is style points in deceiving someone without having to lie. When the victim to deceive themselves, that is winning on Hard Mode for them.
See, what Elaine told you was true…
… from a certain point of view.
The “Elaine Miller” who is active of the internet now is not the same “Elaine Miller” that Godwinson dated way back when and is the girl in all the pictures.
The switch occurred in April 2025 when Elaine said something which appeared to confirm my suspicions that Elaine knew my ex-girlfriend. She apparently recognized her picture.
After Elaine first appeared on the scene, she made several unsuccessful attempts to lure me into DM’s. I didn’t see how I would have anything to gain from doing so and declined.
So once I figured out that Kelly was on the scene, that came up on a list of suspicious events from over the years.
I have had it insinuated to me by people that the real Elaine Miller had my ex-girlfriend’s dox. When I talked to Elaine and gave her some of info I knew including Kelly’s real name, criminal record, etc, that made Elaine a huge liability.
Godwinson probably also had her dox. He disappeared November 2004 shortly after I started Trav’s Ex-Girlfriendgate posting. I think he was similarly a liability.
Once you realize that Elaine is more than one person and you look at things from that point of view, what you were told because true.
The Jewish girl that you were talking about in your livestream? The only child with a rich dad and whose mother of whom is a religious nut? That girl IS in fact innocent. She is NOT a psychotic pedophile witch.
The person who is actually behind Elaine’s internet presence, grooming underaged girls, and spread CP is all those things. The guilty party is a GENTILE only child with a rich dad and a a mom who is a religious nut but REALLY JS. A psychotic pedophile witch.
But that’s not the person Josh was talking about in his livestream. He was talking about the girl in the pictures.
In this sense, Josh did in fact “paint a false pictures”.
It’s not that what Josh said was!’t true. He got the “what” right but not the “whom”.
I am banned from Elaine’s thread once I started talking about her connection to Rachel Siegel which was another person of interest. Elaine’s kiwi farms thread is largely a puppet show but there seems to be a few people in the last couple days who know some of the more underground lore.
