US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Última edición:
Per NYP:
Ver archivo adjunto 6556001
Ver archivo adjunto 6556002

I’d be very interested in hearing the opinions of the rest of those in attendance, rather than just five. I imagine Trump came away from that clusterfuck with a majority swinging to his side.

But…cue Osho:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QFgcqB8-AxE
Everyone fucking knows that every one of those audience members was pre-screened for party loyalty, so what this actually means is that 40% of her likely supporters felt that they had not earned her vote.
 
Reagan was a very mixed bag of a president, and I think it's a worthy discussion about his policies and their impact. You can look at him like Nixon in many ways, Nixon opened up china to the west and that's a bad idea from the prism of 50 years later, but I think he meant to get more consumers for the US economy tbh. We can look at the lasting effects of a policy like the amnesty stuff changing the demographics and ALSO keep in mind he was tricked into it being a door of immigration closing. It doesn't absolve him at all, but it explains it some. The gun control bill was shitty too, but dude in his admin got crippled and he nearly died. Sure it was stupid, but gotta give him a bit of leeway looking that context. All that said, at a certain point it sort of derails a current politics thread. We have to understand his influence on what's going on now though.
The sad thing, is that "mixed bag" or not, (I would also agree mixed bag), he's still the second best president of my lifetime. (Won't admit my age on here, but he was president when I was born.)
 
This "ThE nEw NoRmAl", an endless stream of anonymous sources, 'trust me, bro', and impending drops that never materialize. Be sure to subscribe and click the bell icon, if you're feeling generous, subscribe to my patreon where you'll get news I can't cover here because of Youtube's censorship.
Okay jokes aside there is some information with texas, Ken Paxton allegedly going after Act-blue donations. I feel like while everyone is coping the Act blue scandal seems big. Allegedly foreign actors and dark money are using Act blue to go around campaign finance laws.
Worst of all this could end up backfiring on the dnc because there might actually be some major violations.
I look forward to history looking back on Trump in a sympathetic light
I think history will look at this era and say how insane our populace is.
 
If he ends up being martyred at this point, I'm pretty sure it's going to backfire on her even more than what's already happening...
Even worse, that would be a green light to start assassinating Democrats as well.
There is a reason it is never used so openly. Because it says to your opponent that straight up murder has now become the rules of engagement on the political field. Like it is some backwards African coup. Why do you think Jack Black shit himself and disavowed when his bandmate encouraged political violence? Because he would have a target on his back for reprisal attacks. Every democrat political activist in America would be shitting bricks and be forced in to silence.
What Harris is doing is not only cringe, but dangerous to her own side as well.
 
They are losing the fight now, because the economy is in the toilet and nobody real can afford luxury beliefs anymore. The 2010s were good because everything was shitting money. Now it is dried up and most western country's are 1 needle drop away from big recession. The public need a real plan to handle the hard days to come. This fucking retard is just jabbering about Hitler and fascism as meaningless buzzwords at this point.
While thats true i think its a bit of a different cause and effect. because the economy is in the toilet people are more willing to lash out at luxury beliefs, like the gay rights movement thrived in the shithole of the 1970s economy, but enough "silent majority" conservatives were emboldened by the Reagan win to stuff the fags back in the closet. People forget they were already talking about gay marriage in the last years of carter's presidency. anything set in the future just took it as something that would become a social norm, they already had plenty of openly gay elected city representatives. Luxury beliefs were mostly mocked in the 1980s despite the economy being in the opposite of the toilet while luxury beliefs were all over the post-watergate 1970s to the point where the media was successfully able to "cancel" any openly homophobic people. We had double digit inflation and the media cared more about Anita Bryant than the fact that the city she lived in became the murder capital of the US because of illegal immigrants.

The work of Rufo and other people and especially social media easing up on censoring thanks to musk buying X and tiktok not being run by jews meant the words that worked in 2020 now have become jokes. if Biden pulled what Kamala just did everyone would believe him. no one would be able to openly disagree.
 
Kamala Harris is the closest thing to a robot running for president that we're gonna see this century. She has no beliefs, no convictions, no thoughts or opinions of her own, she just does what her advisors/masters/whatever you want to call them say to do. And when that doesn't work, as we're seeing right now, she gets on camera, looking like she just did an all night bender and starts rambling about Trump bad again.

I wonder if anyone close to Biden realized just how hollow she was when they decided to make her VP.
And that's why it's so critical that Trump wins.

It's not even about Trump, or partisanship. If Trump loses, legitly or not, it will give this Potemkin regime built on self-evident bullshit all it needs to claim its right to rule forever, with nobody to say otherwise.

Kamala winning will cement their ultimate crime: getting away with it.
 
Did you miss how the UK Government, through a front "anti-hate" organization, has "Kill Elon's X" as one of their top agenda items? The same Anti-Hate org has ties to the US Government, too, supposedly.

Yes, they are going to kill X if they can. They have to. They've burned all their credibility and need to prevent dissenting voices.
i wonder if them trying to destroy twitter and failing is what's gonna lead to the big I Internet falling apart and the EU and other countries trying to make their own little i internets. I think i remember @Null talking about how ultimately that's what these countries want to do anyway.
 
i wonder if them trying to destroy twitter and failing is what's gonna lead to the big I Internet falling apart and the EU and other countries trying to make their own little i internets. I think i remember @Null talking about how ultimately that's what these countries want to do anyway.
I can see the benefits of an internet where Pajeets and Israel are banned from

It will be very different though. Like would it just be that major sites like Facebook must be compartmentalized by nation?
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo