US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Última edición:
We're supposed to have ID but I can't remember when I was last asked for it. I bring my polling card as it makes the process easier for the officials and it's always the same two guys on the table I have to go to, so possibly they just recognise me at this point. One of them in particular lives for polling days and has regaled me more than once about the time he got to meet Trump, during his presidency, and found him to be a pretty nice guy. While his booth-mate gives him serious side eye.
 
Showing a bunch of fraud happening without it being corrected at this point in the election is not exactly encouraging. The Supreme Court already cucked so it's not like all the proof of cheating is going to nullify the election. What's even the process to address it at this point?
There isn't one. Last time there was overwhelming evidence of fraud that broke existing laws. The courts threw out every single case, including the SCOTUS, without looking at them. You'd have to replace all the judges at a minimum. Overwhelmingly though what 2020 showed is that it can only be addressed as the cheat is happening, not after.
Hate to be an ass, but I doubt the media ever will; with the amount of easily brainwashed tards that automatically believe anything the media says, it's likely that the Dems will use Jan. 6th as one of their preferred propaganda pieces for quite some time.
If Trump wins, Jan 6th will vanish just like magic. They will keep it in the news cycle briefly to wag their finger at voters for voting Hitler back in, but come January when their people have a violent riot in DC and threaten the lives of senators they will immediately memory hole Jan6 and never mention it again until the next time a republican loses an election.
We also have some court precedent going our way. We've got a SCOTUS ruling saying that if the law says a ballot can't be counted, you can't count it, and a circuit court ruling saying you can't keep collecting ballots after election day.
And how shall you enforce those rulings when it's too early to object to violations before the votes are validated, too late after, and treason to do it while it's being validated?
Bush will never endorse Kamala. Not only because she’s a whore, but the guy has been open about not being involved in politics after his term.
Bush will do it if they decide it is necessary. He doesn't get a choice in the matter. However, it's too late in the election cycle for that to matter. They've already started their cheating, they can save their W trump card for some other election.
Trump has totally lost the tranny vote by an absolute landslide though. According to the polls, among trannies, Trump is only at a mere 7% whereas Kamala is at 52%...
Kamala has that 0.05% of the vote locked in. Statistically, though, she'll only have about 0.03% of it come 2028
10 states have no exception for rape or incest
And they shouldn't. If your neighbor rapes you, why should you have the right to murder his kid?

I may be a doomer, but I'll still be here on Tuesday. I hope Trump does win, and if the DNC were smart they'd lay down and let it happen so that the people's guards will be down when the next candidate rolls up. But I don't have any faith that Trump will be able to do anything, or that his supporters will even try, if they manage to cheat the votes.

As it is, even if Trump wins, I suspect it'll be by a narrow breath or a state flipping that the DNC never imagined was even at play, when the real results are probably Reagan v Mondale.
 
He was like this well before the stroke,
its like Zuckerberg with his hoodie, the Neanderthal is a trust fund kid and just dresses down because thats what all trashy penn people do.
Why does society bottom text worship these people again?
the 70s/80s were weird, and people were starving for a champion, they're as true to the working class as shane gillis is to the alt-right. they were semi-forced to pander to them on the huge way up, and have to keep pretending to like them the rest of their lives. Jersey also had the same chip on its shoulder that philly does now, because people lived there but it wasn't a place people enjoyed living.
Some of these aging rockers sound like bad covers of themselve
its a very small list of people who can sing as well in their 60s as they did in their 20s also people have noted the techs working for kamala suck at their job too.
What are people saying about zoomers and music? What is replacing rap music?
women led pop and just country in general is replacing rap music, at best you have country inspired hip hop, one of my aunts sperged hard about JellyRoll a few months ago, not even me saying i like him (i don't) just at me bringing up the name because he's apparently ruining country music.

Beyond that the meme of zoomers being hyperconservative anti-sex, anti-booze weirdos seems mostly true from what i've seen. they proudly ingest nicotine like its going out of style but a 6 pack takes them a week to finish. whereas when i was their age, that was just what you drank during your drive to wherever you wanted to be.
She already knows the kids gay?
Ditch Detroit to go on SNL.
If you were given the offer of Detroit or SNL wouldn't you chose SNL? Tim Robinson did
I suspect the SNL thing was arranged last minute because of Rogan.
except it can't be, they write all the sketches by wendesday so they can get the actors performing them by saturday.
 
Última edición:
So what is the actual argument shitlibs put out as to how Voter ID is racist to niggers?
Niggers in cities might not have ID because they don't drive cars, so they don't have driver's licenses. It also makes it harder for trannies to vote because they have to show their true name to the voting officials.

But it all falls apart once you realize that even Canada requires you to show the officials your ID when you vote. Fucking Canada. Are they more racist than we are? Or maybe, just maybe, is it because they don't want fraud in their elections?

canada voter id.png
 
Niggers in cities might not have ID because they don't drive cars, so they don't have driver's licenses. It also makes it harder for trannies to vote because they have to show their true name to the voting officials.
Needed an ID to get an Obamaphone and the vaccine [drops the mic and walks away]
 
if there was a chance of either California or New York flipping red, which one is more likely?
New York. The bulk of the state, including a lot of areas that used to be blue locks, have gradually become more and more red every election cycle courtesy of NYC's serial mismanagement. It led to Republicans sweeping town council positions on Long Island during the last electoral cycle, and they had to basically go into cheating overdrive to stop further losses in NYC. Many of the core blue demographics have been alienated as well, further lowering turnout.
 
So what is the actual argument shitlibs put out as to how Voter ID is racist to niggers?
Basically, a few studies, and historically bad laws are being extrapolated to say that if you put in voter ID, you WILL be racist, you WILL prevent minorities from getting the ID, and you WILL make it impossible for people without cars to get one.

Guardian, Democracy Docket, Brennan Center, League of Women Voters,Attached document is one of the studies, but it's actually one of the less biased ones.

This reddit thread (still archiving) actually has a bunch of people pointing out anecdotes and laws that probably had a reason to be this way, but ended up being labelled racist because Niggers will never grow up into Black Men and fucking get ID.

Of course, these studies are retarded, and have an extreme anti-republican (no, not pro-dem) bias, the attached study describing them:
Within this framework, the only winners are Republican leaders who employ these laws to hijack the democratic process and bias outcomes in their favor.
When even fucking Vox calls bullshit, you know shit's fucked.

Weiser 2014, Berman 2011, Kobach 2011, Pastor et al 2010 (attached), White et al 2014 (attached), Hood & Bullock 2012 (attached)

Do note the difference, all anti-ID stuff are basically opinion pieces, whereas all studies are at worst showing personal responsibility differences (niggers RIGHT NOW don't have ID, therefore ID is racist) and at best showing quite literally no effect, even when separating by race (Hood & Bullock 2012)
 

Archivos adjuntos

Última edición:
Even this shithole I live in requires IDs and a full-on biometric registry in order to be eligible to vote. Why cant you niggas do the same over there?
Because American black people are too incapable to manage the task of getting an id. This is not my opinion, it is the stance of 100% of Democrats.
 
There isn't one. Last time there was overwhelming evidence of fraud that broke existing laws. The courts threw out every single case, including the SCOTUS, without looking at them. You'd have to replace all the judges at a minimum. Overwhelmingly though what 2020 showed is that it can only be addressed as the cheat is happening, not after.
You're right, but isn't the point to get the lawsuits and evidence recorded now, before the election, so they can't pull muh "no standing, Lactches' again? Because then we will have that standing?
 
So what is the actual argument shitlibs put out as to how Voter ID is racist to niggers?
Ages ago, I got into a protracted argument on this very board, and one of our users - I can't even remember which one, was arguing unironically that requiring voter ID somehow constituted a poll tax. They legitimately had no actual defense of the core point beyond the poll tax conflation.

They relied on the most ass-backwards, confused, circular reasoning I'd ever seen, putting quite a few people that intentionally shit up threads on this site to shame. Absolutely bizarre.
 

The fact that they're still pushing this narrative for muh clicks really shows how shitty they are to their own people.

They're deliberately stoking neuroses and even psychoses in their audience by telling them the world is ending if Trump wins. They want them to riot or kill themselves. They want to fan the flames of anxieties instead of considering tactics or strategy for dealing with the next four years.
 
How much more hyperbolic can you get than "extinction level"?

I know they are referring to Muh Democracy, but they are putting out the buzzwords to incite fear in individuals.
What is there to fear more than extinction?
The only way to save democracy is to import infinity migrants to all the swing states, give them amnesty, and guarantee that the Democrats win every election forever

THAT'S democracy, not the whole "give the people a choice" thing
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo