Última edición:
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
I think they're referencing a clip I saw in a Mark Dice video today.sigh... I know this...
they appear to have trotted this out just recently, possibly as a response to the report that some federal law has changed (by their doing) to encourage military response to election results denial. Im guessing it all started this week or the previous one.
If you want entertaining, go with Trump. If you want a chaotic shit show, Kamala.All memes aside, I can't decide who I prefer because I'm basing it on which outcome would result in the most entertaining and chaotic America.
Once again we have to tell them: Stop getting people's hopes up! It's manipulative and it's wrong! When will they learn turning him into a Boogieman only helps him!? Makes him stronger!?>ANTIFA
In lefty speak this means that he is going to round up everyone and kill them
I'd say more entertaining would be Orange Man, with less national chaos. More national chaos would be Kamala due to, well, come on now.All memes aside, I can't decide who I prefer because I'm basing it on which outcome would result in the most entertaining and chaotic America.
Harrissisters...we are less capable than an old man with dementia...Goddamn.
Joy has evaporated and now has turned into doom.
Ver archivo adjunto 6532923Ver archivo adjunto 6532924
Oh reading that made me wince in cringe. Jesus when the demented old fuck knows what’s about to happen and she still has no idea how bad it will be.Goddamn.
Joy has evaporated and now has turned into doom.
Ver archivo adjunto 6532923Ver archivo adjunto 6532924
"But foreign interference in our elections is ok when we do it."
"He's gonna use troops on Americans!!!!"
Can someone fill me in where this new asinine talking point originated and with whom it did? I see this everywhere now.
I have a lefty relative who is very exasperated over Trump supposedly declaring in the past day that he'll use the military against "the enemy from within", namely Adam Schiff. Anyone here know what this is about and the truth of it? I don't trust the media and have a feeling this is another "bloodbath" misconstruing, but I can't find any mention of it here.
Thanks for trying to help, but man does that article not make the matter any clearer. But at least it states a source interview (though no hyperlink, conveniently) that I'm able to look up separately, and whaddya know, looks like it is indeed a "bloodbath" situation after all when Trump is clearly talking about the potential of American left-wing rioters like Antifa on and after election day that ought to be responded to with the National Guard as usual (and with the approval of still-President Biden, technically), when asked about violent foreign interference on election day like the Afghan terrorist that recently got caught ( 7:58 ):
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Kmmx1zQCQds:475No name checking Adam Schiff here like all of the articles are apparently talking about. I can only surmise that in a later TV-only portion of the interview, he separately (and rightfully) disparaged Adam Schiff as a primary actor in the post-2016 Russian Hoax.
Okay, I found that FoxNews.com has another interview clip specifically of the Adam Schiff portion, and yes, it's Trump lambasting him as a radical who cultivated the Russian Hoax. Schiff just happens to be phrased as an "enemy from within" too, but not in the riotous context that the National Guard is about.
Trump: The 'enemy from within' is more dangerous than any foreign country [6363207158112].mp4
Technically, Trump doesn't even answer the original question about how he'd "guard against the bureaucrats undermining [him]." Doesn't say that he'd do anything to Schiff.
"Trump isn't a real man, which is why you should vote for a woman instead"Presented without comment.
videoplayback.mp4
Yeah, let's just forget the all women town hall from last night, the Bloomberg interview, the fact that he agreed to both debates on the Democrat candidate's terms/demands, etc ...
he should go back to playing a retard in marvel movies it works much better for himPresented without comment.
videoplayback.mp4
Wow, is this what they think of men? Holy shit.Presented without comment.
videoplayback.mp4
Hi, I'm an independent fact checker and that interview was doctored. Fox News decided not to publish the full clip, wishing to hurt the Vice President.MSNDNC isn't going to convince moderates and independents on this one.
"70-something percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track ... And you've been Vice President for 3.5 years."
"aNd DoNaLd TrUmP iS rUnNiNg!"
Bitch just KO'd herself harder than even Tulsi Gabbard did in 2019.
And Donald Trump has been campaigning for office for the past eight years. The core issue is that the nation has seen a downturn since Mr. Trump chose to polarize us with his damaging language. I have conversed with several young individuals, Brett, and they unanimously concur that the Summer of 2016 was their last experience of genuine freedom—a period when they could "Pokemon Go to the polls"—as it was the final Summer prior to the onset of pervasive political engagement. America needs a novel trajectory, one devoid of Democrats or Republicans, but only comprising Americans, a goal unattained due to Mr. Trump's ongoing divisiveness.
My biggest problem is whether or not I prefer total human suffering is based on how good I feel about myself any given day. I think Kamala would be better if everything stays on track and I vastly improve my daily feelings. Like, I think about how awesome it would be if I felt good while everyone else around me suffered immeasurably. That might be the best world.If you want entertaining, go with Trump. If you want a chaotic shit show, Kamala.