US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Trump is trying to guilt ACB and Gorsuch into siding with him on Birthright Citizenship by pointing out how Dem justices always side with their party without being so harsh on them that they rule against him out of spite.
It's funny to see Trump try to pull off such a balancing act.
1778453011937.png
He's straight up admitting that he cucked out to SCOTUS on the tariff decision, making him complicit in further raping America's economy, and that he's going to cuck out on the birthright citizenship decision.

Does he even still have that Andrew Jackson portrait in the Oval Office anymore?
 
Trump is trying to guilt ACB and Gorsuch into siding with him on Birthright Citizenship by pointing out how Dem justices always side with their party without being so harsh on them that they rule against him out of spite.
It's funny to see Trump try to pull off such a balancing act.
I interpreted it as him threatening to pack the Court if the birthright citizenship ruling goes sideways.
 
He's not wrong. Dem judges vote for core dem policies no matter what. They throw a bone and vote against their guys on side issues or minor technicalities, but on their signature agenda items they 100% back their side and 100% oppose the GOP. Meanwhile Republican judges fall all over themselves to stick a knife in the back of Republican agenda items.

Sounds like he got word they are planning to do it yet again on birthright citizenship. At the end of the day he appointed them though. If Jackson could get through the Senate to be a democrat rubber stamp there is no excuse for his appointees being coinflips.
 
So excited to see Massie end up another one of those gotten rid of.
How is Gallrein campaigning in KY-04? Nasty Massie's Faggy "moneybomb" bullshit made semi-news that I took note of, but that out-of-district support doesn't automatically mean more actual constituency support. Polls are fake and gay, and even they have Ed trailing by only single digits against an incumbent.
 
He's straight up admitting that he cucked out to SCOTUS on the tariff decision, making him complicit in further raping America's economy, and that he's going to cuck out on the birthright citizenship decision.

Does he even still have that Andrew Jackson portrait in the Oval Office anymore?
Thank you reverse oracle.
 
He's not wrong. Dem judges vote for core dem policies no matter what. They throw a bone and vote against their guys on side issues or minor technicalities, but on their signature agenda items they 100% back their side and 100% oppose the GOP. Meanwhile Republican judges fall all over themselves to stick a knife in the back of Republican agenda items.

Sounds like he got word they are planning to do it yet again on birthright citizenship. At the end of the day he appointed them though. If Jackson could get through the Senate to be a democrat rubber stamp there is no excuse for his appointees being coinflips.
Unfortunately during his first administration he was deciding his judicial nominees via the Federalist Society. If 2nd term Trump was in 1st Trump's position, he would've picked better people, especially ACB, but given the timing he knew he had to pick a woman to even have a chance at the nomination going through. But he definitely could've picked someone better than her.
 
Oh no, the heritage foundation gave him a 84%. Wanna show me his AIPAC score as well?
By the way, Republicans have voted to fund transgender surgeries for minors and turning farmland into data centers, but I guess not voting with muh party makes you le bad
Look fuentes, it does not matter how hard you scream JEW , it will not make massie any more likable.Maybe write him and ask him to stop being a countersignaler(like you) with coincidental ties to progressives that call for no borders(his constituents are staunchly against this btw)
The massie congressional race is something important to me, I try my best to only really say much when someone asks or talks about it. I agree though, it's mostly a puppet fight for browns to line up behind some lolbert retards. It always presents as some sort of big fight against jews. It's not, it's a fight about some nevertrump back bencher that has never done anything to help kentuckians that sent him to dc, but he's always tried to frame it as it's just little thomas massie against all the evil.
What's it like on the ground? I still think massie has a good chance personally.
Gee, maybe if Trump realized that he misspoke once, he could avoid saying the files are a hoax.
Maybe if his supporters could let him know he misspoke instead of making excuses.
I notice you side-stepped the fact that you are a headline reading subhuman.
Despite the chris-chan posting the court WILL BTFO him
 
It's funny to see Trump try to pull off such a balancing act.
1778453011937.png
The thing is, he's 100 percent right. It's okay to disagree on things that only hurt us a little bit, but these big decisions they need to come through for us. If they rule against birthright citizenship, i'm not sure how much longer we can keep being a country. Any enemy country can send their people to shit out kids here and boom, citizens.
 
What's it like on the ground? I still think massie has a good chance personally.
Tide is starting to shift toward Ed, but it's going to be close i think. It all comes down ot getting out the vote at this point, I hope we can get enough folks to get to the polls, and that they can see through massie's bullshit lies.

I'm nervous, but i always am during elections I have any sort of connection to. I have to be very careful in exactly what i say, I really do hope people understand what i'm saying without having to come right out and say it.
 
Tide is starting to shift toward Ed, but it's going to be close i think. It all comes down ot getting out the vote at this point, I hope we can get enough folks to get to the polls, and that they can see through massie's bullshit lies.

I'm nervous, but i always am during elections I have any sort of connection to. I have to be very careful in exactly what i say, I really do hope people understand what i'm saying without having to come right out and say it.
Do we have an easy list of Massie's lies to copy post?

I think I'm more turned off by Massie simps claiming he is principaled and stuff.
 
Trump is trying to guilt ACB and Gorsuch into siding with him on Birthright Citizenship by pointing out how Dem justices always side with their party without being so harsh on them that they rule against him out of spite.
It's funny to see Trump try to pull off such a balancing act.
Shieeet. Another win for the fat man SHawwwwn.

I assumed that Birthright would fail solely because of ACB thinking about her niglets whenever she asked questions.
 
"In a quiet Utah city, a series of muffled gunshots shattered a suburban neighborhood. When first responders arrived on scene, they found two adults dead in a home. As investigators began canvassing the neighborhood, they discovered a man hiding inside a neighbor’s home — the couple’s son. Find out what happened next on this episode of Law&Crime Investigates. "

They didn't kiss the ring and use the magic pronoun words. They're gonna get canceled~!
 
Unfortunately during his first administration he was deciding his judicial nominees via the Federalist Society. If 2nd term Trump was in 1st Trump's position, he would've picked better people, especially ACB, but given the timing he knew he had to pick a woman to even have a chance at the nomination going through. But he definitely could've picked someone better than her.
Gorsich is a legitimately good Justice who fails to see what time it is on occasions. Even when I dislike his decisions his argument is pretty solid. Barrett not so much. I like her more than roberts in many regards but am thoroughly underwhelmed in most circumstances. I dont think we should ever consider nominated female justices at this point. Women simply arent built to have the final say in difficult decisions and are not tactical. There's alot of value in having the queen providing perspective to the king, but theres a reason they never had the final say.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo