US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[Betonhaus]

This man is quite the diplomat isn't he.

You got to respect a man that has recognised that everything is bullshit and just rolls with it. Poland's opinion on the matter is irrelevant, hence an irrelevant response is required.

 

[Breadbassket]

Footage out of Minnesota within the last couple hours:
Protesters face off with state troopers in Minneapolis

“What the fuck? Let’s go home, let’s come back in the morning” a woman says to protesters tonight in Minneapolis

 

[FloorPlanGreen]

Add to that the fact that zoomers are the most left-wing generation in history. Once boomers die off that's when the final bulwark against gay race communism goes up in smoke. See you all in the FEMA camps.

I know this is Fatpacks but I am bored.

Spoiler: Generational Voting Autism

1976 Carter vs Ford (Boomer 18-29 *Median Average*)-R 52.5%*
1980 Carter vs Reagan (Mixed 18-29 *Median Average*)-R 44%*
1984 Mondale vs Reagan (Highly Mixed 18-29 *Median Average*)-R 59%*

2024 Harris vs Trump (Zoomer 18-29)-R White: 49% Male: 49% (CNN Exit poll- I use the CNN exit poll as for these purposes this is as conservative an estimate as possible.)

Truthfully we need to see another election to know the voting trends but (based on voter polarization but also); unless you think non-whites (Aged 18-29) made up less then 8% of the electorate 1976-1984 the voting numbers are generally fairly similar around the same age. At least for the data we have now.

Of course this is a broad generalization and there are a thousand factors but if we are going to talk about MUH GENERATION, we aren't being very pedantic anyway.

 

[JayseeDenton]

Footage out of Minnesota within the last couple hours:
Protesters face off with state troopers in Minneapolis

1.mp4

“What the fuck? Let’s go home, let’s come back in the morning” a woman says to protesters tonight in Minneapolis

2.mp4

They really just can't pull crowds anymore, even over the summer they weren't getting 1/10 what they were for the average floydfest concert.

 

[mold]

Women shouldn't be able to vote and my reasoning is threefold;

1. Women do not sign up to selective service and I don't believe that should change. Because of this fact their right to vote and each vote they cast will always be considered "less than" on a metaphorical and spiritual level since their ability to vote is unearned unlike mens.

2. Being given the vote caused them to be the target of extremely dangerous and manipulative propaganda and advertising that quite frankly their minds are not equipped to handle. Its one thing to manipulate them into buying yet another handbag or makeup. Tricking them into voting for policies that make them more likely to get raped is a different beast.

3. They shouldn't have to vote. Men's votes should already be taking their wants and needs into account. These women are mens wives, daughters, mothers, grandmothers. It is foolishness to pretend men don't consider how policy changes would effect humans they are deeply connected too. This might end up with some small sects of women like lesbians, catladies, and feminists being more disenfranchised than other women but I would argue that's a feature not a bug.

I'd give up female suffrage in return for suffrage limited to educated property owners. Your first point is dumb because giving birth is equivalent to going to war and unlike dying in war we actually mostly do that. The second and third point apply to poorfags, so sure, if the male masses lose the vote I'll give up mine.

 

[Romulus augustulus]

Aren't virtually all of that mineral resources locked away under the ice sheet?, and why does Trump want to expand US territory in the 21st century like we are still in the 1800s?

because Pax Americana requires imperium

 

[Basic Blond Boy]

Until the Trump administration gets serious about holding the media responsible for propaganda opticsfagging is a losing game.

Going to take a weird stance here. I sort of want to see 2028 play out as I think the Left will just up and kill themselves. It is getting more obvious that the older chunks of the party are having a rough time containing the younger crazies. The second you get a Hasan Piker speaking to anyone older then Millennial, I think the party will just shatter. Any anti-Jew stance becoming mainstream will break the older Dems brains after years of Holocaust conditioning.

Bernie was seen as radical by the older chunks of the party, and new candidates like AOC are far more demanding and mask off than him. I think the Dems will try to maintain the Obama image through Newsome, but if he fails, there will be no way to continue the shtick anymore. I cannot see a large chunk of Dems being okay with the financial and social rape about to be dished out by the Progressives, especially with there no longer being a Trump to boogie man the elderly back in line.

 

[Tony Martin's Force Ghost]

I like Tusk because he actually puts Poland first; he also knows that Poland has a small position on the world stage and never goes above his level. I can see why Trump respects him greatly. Orbin and Tusk are based as hell, and give zero fucks. You can tell they despise Ursula.

I can see AOC being ousted by the centrists of the Dems for going way too far. She thinks she has more power than she does and will not be a good pick. She is far too divisive, and not many people actually like her. I think in 28, they are going to select Harris again. Newsome and AOC are optics poison, even more than Harris.

 

[mold]

anyway the issue with mass suffrage, male female or tranny, isn't as simple as the masses being irrational and voting for irrational shit. The issue is that when electoral politics has to seek the mass vote it gets all fucked up.

Everyone knows that it was the female vote that got Hitler in (everyone knows that, right?) but fun fact: if the Republic had given Spanish women the vote, the Spanish Civil War wouldn't have happened, because Spanish women would have voted for fascism too. There were Spanish female legislators before Spanish female suffrage; they opposed female suffrage for exactly this reason.

Women are just as easy to rile up with fear as with sentimentality. Modern western women have retarded politics about immigration and browns primarily because of information control. If the media they consume were yelling at them about Jocelyn Nungaray and Riley Laken the way it yells about Renee Good women as a class would want Hart Celler undone yesterday.

But having to chase after the mass votes to put in rational policies is just as destructive to politicians as having to chase after them to put in irrational ones. It's why the founders didn't want a mass democracy. Fear, greed, jingoism are all bad ways to make decisions.

 

[PlapPlapPlapPlapPlap]

Footage out of Minnesota within the last couple hours:
Protesters face off with state troopers in Minneapolis

1.mp4

>OUR CITY
>>OUR CITY
Were these people flown in from fuck-knows-where today or yesterday?

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

2/10 bait
Ver archivo adjunto 8398131

Okay maybe he really is literally Hitler. They'll try to kill him, right?

 

[babyDunk]

what
a
faggot
Ver archivo adjunto 8399357

Chief Day of Faggot Squad.mp4

Why would american latinos feel attacked when Tren du niggas get btfoed? Would they not hate them just as much or even more as other americans?

 

[Chaotic Good Barbarian]

If this was decades ago, I would agree. If implemented currently, it would be mostly Boomers and Gen Xers living completely outside these current year shitholes, voting based on what the tv says and who gives the most social security gibs.

The younger generations may still contribute to society, but their current situations would mean that they are doing it to get raped by people with land that they have been completely priced out of. I would argue having a job would be a better indicator currently, but even then Zoomers struggle with that in the current hell market, irregardless of if they have a desire to work, they are locked out.

Oh, no, not those gosh darn Xers.

"Don't extend the vote to the dregs of society...just not me, a guy who can't get a job because muh generation or something."

Speaking of, the whole "generational complaint" thing is a boomer touchstone to begin with. Get new material, basic bitch boy.

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

The lack of introspection in the TES thread is astounding. They never seem to self-regulate their own small community, and a few of them, like Big Shot and pink triangles, seem like they are trying to “egg on” this behavior.

Publicar en el tema 'Trump Enslavement Syndrome'

10 de Ene, 2026

As someone coming from the Synthetic Man threads, it's the same with anyone with those ghoulish views. They have absolutely nothing positive going on in their lives whether that be with relationships, careers or any sort of meaningful experiences outside of a small bubble whether that be a backwater shithole or the same four walls of their room every day. So they dedicate themselves to the online space and become more and more detached with reality and their humanity over time to the point that they cheer on the violent death of a mother who just happened to be in the wrong place...

• RandomTwitterGuy

Reacciones: x 5 x 3 x 3 x 1 x 1

I realize “no u” is not an argument, and that “every allegation is an accusation” gets very tiring. But when someone makes a charge out of nowhere, it does tend to apply more often than not.

Just about all of their allegations can be just as accurately reflected back on them, or perhaps more accurately. I’m starting to think a few of the TES regulars are actually malicious right-wingers trying to subtly mess with them. It’s the clear “us versus them” mentality that allows such stealth trolling to fly under the radar. Or they may not even be right-wing, but one of the many enemies of KF.

I bring this up not as a takedown attempt, but because we are seeing older accounts acting like 2025 sign up date accounts. Someone made a great point that people can sell their accounts for money, or just give them away, or older accounts that became mothballed almost 10 years ago simply didn’t update their security. (think of fools who used FirstNameLastName emails, or whose passwords were just “password”)

There is no shortage of hostile entities who have it out for kiwi farms, from some guy in his basement to legitimate governments. And we have had some narrow gaps in security exploited since at least 2019.

Edit: okay this can apply to many other threads as well, but I single out TES because of the black and white dogma they have that might allow bad actors to get in

TLDR: sus and among us

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

Women shouldn't be able to vote and my reasoning is threefold;

1. Women do not sign up to selective service and I don't believe that should change. Because of this fact their right to vote and each vote they cast will always be considered "less than" on a metaphorical and spiritual level since their ability to vote is unearned unlike mens.

2. Being given the vote caused them to be the target of extremely dangerous and manipulative propaganda and advertising that quite frankly their minds are not equipped to handle. Its one thing to manipulate them into buying yet another handbag or makeup. Tricking them into voting for policies that make them more likely to get raped is a different beast.

3. They shouldn't have to vote. Men's votes should already be taking their wants and needs into account. These women are mens wives, daughters, mothers, grandmothers. It is foolishness to pretend men don't consider how policy changes would effect humans they are deeply connected too. This might end up with some small sects of women like lesbians, catladies, and feminists being more disenfranchised than other women but I would argue that's a feature not a bug.

The idea of limiting suffrage is nice in a vacuum but in reality it creates a clear pressure point the commies will rally on and as such turn the disenfranchised into loyal foot soldiers and voters later on.
The solution is not less suffrage, it's more suffrage. Instead of one vote per person you could instead give more votes for people who pay taxes, for people who own land, for people who have children. My pie in the sky idea is one vote per household, multiplied and added to depending how much they would contribute to society, that way the argument of X Y or Z can't vote is muted, since in theory they can vote they just need to do something.

 

[mold]

I think one of the things that has gotten many people who otherwise champion personal freedom and governmental restraint (myself included) to really root for the government to go gloves off with these protesters is that deep in our bones we know they intend to do worse to us as soon as they get the chance. If their morals would stop them from attacking g us, then they wouldn't attack LEOs either. The only thing stopping them from going after their conservative neighbors with that same sort of terroristic behavior is that, at some level, they believe there would be negative consequences for them if they did. So every time they go to a riot and harass the police and walk away unscathed, we know we are that much closer to them forming a mob and coming after us. We need the police to shove their heads in because our survival is on the line. We need them to know the consequences are real.

do you not remember 2020? them forming a mob and coming after you isn't a possibility, it already happened

otherwise yes absolutely

 

[LiquidKid]

Ask him if you can hit him with your car "only once." If he says no, do it anyway.

It’s a white woman

Have you made him watch the video from the cops perspective?

yes(this argument has been going on now for over 4 hours)

 

[Chaotic Good Barbarian]

I understand the feeling and agree. Not to invoke the MUH 3D CHESS BRO, but there is something to be said in letting them look as lawless and insane as possible. Perhaps the feds might be rushing the investigating while the local politician activists are busy being retarded. Might be trying to let them run wild in an attempt to boost midterms, tbh.

This.

Perception is reality, and the normie is only beginning to stir from his long slumber.

They need to see with their own eyes what others have known for years.

 

[mold]

Someone made a great point that people can sell their accounts for money

really? how much?

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

It’s a white woman

yes(this argument has been going on now for over 4 hours)

Ver archivo adjunto 8399573

>Uses the word heck
She's a lost cause bro. Just call her a dumb commie and stop wasting your time. If you're that desperate just point out that cops are allowed to shoot fleeing suspects. Also that intent is meaningless, if you are in fear of your life and or body integrity you are allowed to defend yourself with lethal force.