Beria was one of the longest serving politicians of Stalin's regime and everybody knew he was a gluttonous murdering pedophile.
Whenever somebody says "Even the commies don't like X" they're either naive or forgetting history, or the present. Communism is entrenched with pedophiles. Communists love luxury goods. Communists love animal abuse. Communism is a haven for degenerates, and we aught to remember that.
Stalin himself was also a pedo,
he fathered bastards on a 14-year old as a 35-year-old starting during his exile in Siberia.
Interesting because the this is exactly what happened when Christian Roman emperors let the Visigoths in.
All this happens because Christianity preaches tolerance and love even against people who explicitly want to rape and kill you.
History repeats.
But at least unlike with Rome dealing with this is possible and it has became such a problem that populists in the government are taking full advantage of it.
Contrary to the delusions of retarded fedora tippers and pagan LARPers, the Romans didn't let the Goths in because 'reee they were dumb Christcucks'. After they let themselves in by crushing the Eastern Roman army at Adrianople, the Goths were recruited as mercenaries because actual Romans increasingly didn't want to fight for a system which was reducing them to serfs (then called
coloni) stuck slaving away alongside the actual slaves under rich senatorial aristocrats (latifundists, as in, their estates were the original
latifundia) with no economic prospects of their own.
Also the East, which was always the more Christian half of the empire (and indeed the half where Christianity got started), outlived the West by 1000 years.
At no time was the Roman Empire exclusively Roman.
To add to this point, 'Roman' was not an ethnicity. The actual Italo-Romans became increasingly irrelevant after the Five Good Emperors, of whom two out of five (Trajan, who expanded the empire to its furthest reaches, and his successor Hadrian of kike-destroying fame) were Spanish. There were
Africans (not kangz, but the mutt descendants of the Carthaginians + local Berbers + incoming Italic settlers),
Arabs and a hell of a lot of Illyrians (from modern-day Croatia & Bosnia, far predating Slavic settlement of those regions) ruling the empire in its last two centuries of existence.
The last remotely capable Western Emperor was Gallic, which is to say, proto-French - his ancestors probably got raped by Caesar's legions and those same legionaries would be appalled to learn that their enemies eventually ended up ruling their country (and doing a much better job of it than the 'pure' Italo-Roman senatorial niggers who eventually backstabbed him in cahoots with the barbs).
'Roman' was always more of a nationality rather than an actual ethnic marker, similar to how there's no shortage of Americans today who are of Irish, German, Italian, etc. descent. Even in their earliest days, well before the Empire, the Romans were absorbing non-Latin peoples like the Etruscans - who were probably a pre-Indo-European remnant population and thus to the Romans what the Dravidian dasa/proto-dalit types were to the Aryans who first stormed into India - as well as the Greek colonists of Magna Graecia (southern Italy).
