US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Trump turning on MTG (someone who I never even liked) over the Epstein files and acting like she became a democrat over it is one of the most retarded things he's ever done and makes him look guilty as fuck even if he dindunuffin, Does he not remember he literally campaigned on releasing the fucking things?
Two things can be true at once. Trump is stupid, MTG is stupid. More people should give pushback to Trump for his H-1B policy and his handling of the Epstein files. When people act crazy fiending for attention, call them out on it.
 
Trump turning on MTG (someone who I never even liked) over the Epstein files and acting like she became a democrat over it is one of the most retarded things he's ever done and makes him look guilty as fuck even if he dindunuffin, Does he not remember he literally campaigned on releasing the fucking things?
He campaigned on it by making some tweets about it, stating some quotable talking points, and having some photo ops over it. It was never a core issue it was a tertiary topic to garner some more votes that might pan out and might not. Turns out it probably won’t. If that is a dealbreaker there’s always voting for acceleration I guess. 🤷‍♂️
 
I don't doubt for a second that Musk will offer users the opportunity to set their flag if they buy X Premium.
the implication was that this would be a feature that you can turn off, but it will tell everyone if you've turned it off, which means anyone with it disabled might as well have an indian flag.
 
And when exactly did he do this?Last i checked it was OpenAI and SoftBank that made a commitment to invest $500 billion for AI infrastructure.

I do agree it's going to be bad when this bubble bursts.
Edit: The money is not government? But what's Trump got to do with it then?

The initial equity funders in Stargate are SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX. SoftBank and OpenAI are the lead partners for Stargate, with SoftBank having financial responsibility and OpenAI having operational responsibility. Masayoshi Son will be the chairman.​

Edit 2: (pilsburylaw) Trump rolled back regulations it make it easier to steal the money innovate.

(forbes) The Stargate Project: Trump Touts $500 Billion Bid For AI Dominance​

On the second day of his new term in office last week, President Donald Trump made a big splash by announcing Stargate, a new private joint venture that could have a major impact on AI innovation in the U.S. and beyond. Although many details of the venture are unclear at this early stage, Stargate intends to build up to 20 large AI datacenters in the U.S., with an initial investment of $100 billion and plans for up to $500 billion by 2029. Even without knowing all the specifics, this is clearly a monumental initiative aimed at reinforcing the U.S.’s position as the undisputed global leader in artificial intelligence.

Joining Trump for the announcement were Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Larry Ellison, chairman of Oracle, and Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank. Their three companies serve as the principals of the new joint venture. They are joined by a fourth equity investor, the AI-focused Emirati investment fund MGX, which is controlled by the government of Abu Dhabi. Besides OpenAI and Oracle, key technology contributors include Microsoft, Nvidia and Arm. ...
 
Última edición:
Axios: How Ezra Klein's power play is guiding Democrats (archive)
New York Times columnist Ezra Klein isn't content with opining about the Democratic Party — he's positioned himself as a powerbroker inside of it.

Why it matters: Klein's columnist-turned-operative role is raising concerns inside the Times and the Democratic Party, people familiar with the matter tell Axios.
  • Through his columns, hit podcast, private briefings with Democratic lawmakers and his bestselling book "Abundance" with reporter Derek Thompson, Klein has shaped the party's strategies and policies in President Trump's second term.
Driving the news: Klein has spoken privately this year to potential 2028 candidates such as former Vice President Harris, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, people familiar with the conversations told Axios.
  • He's also spoken with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro on the sidelines of public events, and their teams have been discussing Shapiro appearing on Klein's podcast.
  • When Newsom signed a California deregulation law aimed at making it easier to build housing, he posted on X: "We're urgently embracing an abundance agenda" — a reference to Klein's book that argues Democrats need to back pro-growth policies.
Klein's column in early September urging Democratic senators to shut down the government to confront Trump's expansion of executive power was influential in the senators doing just that for an unprecedented 43 days, according to Senate Democratic officials.
  • "Should Senate Democrats partner with Senate Republicans to fund this government? I don't see how they can," Klein wrote — words that spread throughout Senate offices.
  • After some moderate Senate Democrats said last weekend that they were going to vote to end the shutdown, Klein urged Democrats to keep fighting: "If I were in the Senate, I wouldn't vote for this compromise."
The intrigue: Klein also privately briefed Senate Democrats at their summer retreat.
  • Klein's role in the partisan event raised internal concerns at the Times, people familiar with the situation told Axios. The Times typically has frowned on such actions by its journalists, even opinion columnists.
  • A Times spokesperson said Klein attended the event to discuss his book and told his editor in advance.
Jill Abramson, the paper's former executive editor, told Axios she doesn't see a conflict.
  • "It's true that this is a blurry line between journalism and politics and governing. But he's in the opinion category and not covering news — that's a little blurry itself."
  • "I'm a stickler for staying in your lane," she added. "I think his lane is the Ezra-lane and I don't see him crossing a line. I'm assuming the New York Times is cool with it."
  • Times spokesperson Danielle Rhoades Ha said: "Ezra is a tremendous talent .... he talks to people across the ideological spectrum; it's essential for his reporting to have those conversations, and he approaches them as a journalist. All of this makes him an ideal opinion columnist and host."
  • Klein did not respond to a request for comment.
Klein's large audience and brand has endeared him to some of the Times leadership.
  • His columns consistently have some of the outlet's biggest online traffic, according to people who have seen internal numbers.
  • Deputy managing editor Sam Dolnick, an influential member of the Sulzberger family that owns the Times, has been privately promoting Klein inside the paper and to other media reporters over the past year, people familiar with the matter told Axios.
  • Klein also changed his appearance — working out and growing a beard — which he acknowledged recently "has changed my public image more than I would have thought."
What they're saying: Some Democratic officials advising potential presidential candidates are worried about Klein's influence with party elites at a time when the party is trying to win back working-class votes, having suffered from being cast as too elite and coastal.
  • Klein isn't the person to guide Democrats out of the wilderness, they argue.
  • "You're telling me this man who sits in a f**king West Elm-decorated office is going to be the thought leader for Democrats?" one Democratic aide to a potential presidential candidate said.
 
I don't see it. He hasn't picked up the necessary populism policies that will fuel the next election wave. Nothing about him screams 'authentic'.

He too corpo dem for him to get the support of the left wing AOC supporters of the party. Yes, he is from California, but he is also from California. The only advantage I see to him is just taking up media headlines and getting credit for 'standing up to Trump' whatever that means. I haven't heard of a single good thing about anything he has done for CA.

Barring a true and proper black swan candidate like Manchin, Newsome has the nomination locked up and the real fight will be for the VP slot. AOC primarying Schumer would get her out of the running on that front.
 
Still a retarded argument by him. We can make all the platforms they are launched from/used by: ships, planes, etc. and yet Americans are to retarded to make the expendable munitions for them?

No more that the people aren't going to school for that. Part of it is slots filled up by chinese and other foreign fucks, but also by the failing american education system. This whole flanderization of what trump says is as retarded as the dems doing it.
 
Look, all i want is that anti H-1b visa bill she proposed to pass, i dont care how crazy she is, she can be ditched out later.
Johnson will never let it see the light of day on the floor for a vote. Johnson does what Trump tells him and Trump is telling the world that MTG is persona non grata. It doesn’t matter if she proposes a great bill on any subject, nothing she puts out will be voted on.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo