I really don't envy the position Trump's in. He's a guy roughly in the center of the spectrum while the populace is being dragged to the extremes by both sides. Even his admin in affected by this split.
Steps to immediately remediate Bondi’s mess up, barring resignation/firing (problematic since a new AG will be difficult to confirm):
I think he's just naturally indecisive, but is really good at bluffing. But when he's actually got to put the cards now, he's unsure if he should or not.
It's not about locking up freakish leftists who make dances on Tiktok. It's about getting to the bottom of the network that created Tyler Robinson and sent him out to kill Charlie Kirk. He clearly, as evidenced by not only the Government's own statements but from our own research and limited investigation here on KF, was involved in some radical leftist cell. How deep does it go? How many are like that out there? The Government doesn't need more laws, or more surveillance, to crack down on that specifically. The anti-terror laws already exist. Just because Antifa is a loose branding doesn't stop the terror legislation from activating because that's how we got all of those disparate Islamic terror groups in one swoop because they all subscribed one way or another to the al-Qaeda branding. To focus on the insane freaks making disgusting comments on Twitter and Tiktok is the wrong move because at the end of the day, the actual issue is that there are lunatic leftists who are organizing terror cells and the Government, which has the actual ability given to it under post-9/11 statutes to crack down on it, is being indecisive and can't get their messaging clearer.
I'd love to hear alternatives that aren't "I guess we'll have to accept we'll keep getting shot and we can never be in public again".
The most I've seen is he dabbled in the DSA and Discords. 99% of these faggots just fed post and the <.001% are insane enough to do it IRL instead of in Minecraft.
The same reason we have people die from Guns and that's worth protecting our 2A rights. Because freedom comes with shitty humans able to do shitty things with the tools available to them.
To protect yourself and your loved ones, not for actively hunting down people who said something that hurt your feelings. You are literally living in the ghetto at that point where someone giving you a bad look ends up in multiple manslaughter.
Multiple people, including some associated with the boyfriend, knew about the shooting in advance, and he was in a 20-person Discord server and shared information that he was the shooter. What else did he say there? First the Government (And Discord) lied and said that they were no messages. Now there are. Even if this kid was just radicalized by this kind of shit, we've used this as pretext to crack down on Islamic terror groups. These people are a menace and a threat, and if their ideological radicalization is producing political assassins then we need to deal with it.
Do you have stairs in your house?Did you seriously just now figure that out?!?! God damn man, you've been a user for years; how did you not notice that before now?
I wouldn't mind additionally doing that in several cases. Many of those people publicly stated things like "excellent, now do <public figure> next". There is no way that can be interpreted as anything but an explicit call for further assassinations. They named a specific target. Given that what they are responding to provides a direct template for such assassinations, it wouldn't be unreasonable to state that what they unambiguously convey is: I call for the assassination of <public figure> by rifle at any televised event they are present at in the future.
I'm not disputing either of this, but I am taking issue with the fact that this is the Attorney General's first statements after this assassination and the focus is not on the assassination plot itself, or the fact that radical cells are operating within this country producing assassins and ratcheting up violence and rhetoric, but rather on this sort of thing.
It's a slippery slope for sure. I have mixed feelings for sure. I don't like the term 'hate speech'. She should've just said 'illegal speech'. Things like slander, threats. The term 'hate speech' is too tainted now and can be can mean almost anything.
i think the plan of action is to ship the drugs to a carribean country from which the drugs will get smuggled into the US. only corroborating evidence is a high ranking veneco official whining about the smuggler action being taken down.