US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Última edición por un moderador:
I don't even know why I leave the house. I always miss the really fun Thunderdome shit shows. Fuck my social life, there's gold in this here thread, tonight.

it's not too late to go for gold and post that bunghole
Everyone knows that pink nipples are the true indicator of the True White Man.

LETS SEE SOME TITTIES!
 
Última edición:
I don't want them "forced out".
I don't want them relegated to speaking tours and book signings.
I don't want them free to pursue other ventures.

I want them incarcerated.
I want them destitute.
I want summary justice.
I want damnatio memoriae.

I thought when Trump said that Hillary ran a great campaign and he wasn't going to arrest her, would finally get it through most of y'all, thick skulls that this is it's just a game.

Nobody is actually going to arrests, or anything to the top people. Hell George W. Bush and dick cheney are still walking around free after thier horrible boondoggles in the middle east in the 2000s.

Unless you really screw up
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7667210
Thoughts on this? Personally I think it would scare the HR roasties.
It's not a big deal. I handle resumes and interviews every 2-3 months and you can very obviously tell someone used AI.
  1. Take a look at their job history and their educational background. Somebody who has experience in almost all industries in third world countries are not going to have the written skills of a Rhode Scholar.
  2. Sometimes it's just too neat. Regular people have flawed resumes in small ways. There's a small and forgivable grammatical error here, maybe a parsing issue here, maybe the formatting got all fucked up when they converted it from DocX to PDF or visa versa, you learn to see it like a language.
  3. Most companies are going to parse whatever resumes you send them through an algorithm that searches red flags like gaps in employment, lack of educational skills, lack of experience, basically whatever shortcomings you think a human can have. It forgives but not as much as you'd like to think it does. It also looks for keywords that indicate you're somebody who's ready to buckle the fuck down and do work. At the end of the day, I could get 1000+ resumes but only see 12. Companies are going to shortly incorporate an AI model that recognizes AI models, we already have them in schools.
 
Weirdly enough it’s a genetic thing

Ver archivo adjunto 7667210
Thoughts on this? Personally I think it would scare the HR roasties.
They brought this on themselves. For over a decade now every major employer has been using ATS systems that automatically screen out resumes that don’t have the proper key words. On top of that, employers are no longer interested in taking a risk on a candidate or even training someone up. They all want “top talent.” And can spend months and months trying to fill roles that could have easily been filled within a week.
AI resumes are practically the only way to get your foot in the door without being auto rejected, and even then you stand close to no chance.

So as far as I’m concerned, employers deserve this and deserve to be fucked. If they want human resumes they should use humans to read them(totally not me being salty that I got laid off in February and haven’t found a job after over 1000 applications)


AI model that recognizes AI models, we already have them in schools.
Those don’t work though, countless tests have proven that no AI is fully capable of recognizing AI and will give false positives and negatives left and right.
 
Yeah he edited out the images.

Full Streisand Effect has been initiated.

EDIT: Actually, this is strange. There's no edit message? Does only removing an image not provoke an edit message?
posts don’t show that you edited them unless your edit is more than a few minutes after you post it. there’s a grace period of some kind. i think it’s five minutes or so based on personal experience

The issue is well, if you destroy something, you better have a backup plan to replace it.

And if you don't have a backup plan, a good one well guess what comes back but even more gay
what critical services do NPR and PBS provide that would require a replacement to fill the void? plenty of other liberal propaganda outlets exist to scam old people out of money

i see a man with a beanie hat and big beard looking to the upper left with a heart symbol behind him
 
Atrás
Top Abajo