US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

Destacado
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Presiona para expandir...
Candlelight Desolation dijo:
Really gotta love how Boomers use the Third Reich to beat someone with a cudgel in order to try and use emotional blackmail to shut up anyone who pushes back against them and their view of the world. No nuance, just believe what the man on the TV told you; a lot of them also watch these movies that tug at your heartstrings and try to make you side with the "eternal victims", aka anyone who isn't white.

"Hitler devil bogeyman" is alive and well in the minds of these people; I guarantee if you do something like ask "Why did Hitler become Satan instead of Stalin" it will not go over well.
Presiona para expandir...
They cry about genocides that are not happening (brown and alphabet people) and ignore genocides that are happening (the Uyghurs).
 
Too Many Catgirls dijo:
Only if we also recreate the Aggro Crag on the South Lawn.

Aggro Crag contestants would be comprised of the top four placing individuals of the UFC match and the mud wrestling competition (eight total); with each of these earlier contests having awarded their respective winners the equal amounts of points based upon their rank. During the Aggro Crag portion, points will be scored based upon the time it takes a contestant to climb the Crag, with a small bonus awarded for the order in which contestants finish (no more than 5 points). The four highest scorers then face off against each other simultaneously atop the Crag in a pugil bout, with points awarded for hits landed, form, showmanship and victory. The winner of the bout will be declared winner but the highest scoring individual will also be declared winner. Each category gets half of the trophy, encouraging people to do their very best and take home the full trophy.

In the event that the bout winner and the score winner are not the same person and the trophy is split; they will face off in a biathlon on Pearl Harbor Day and the ultimate winner will be determined. The loser of the biathlon must relinquish their half of the trophy to the winner.

In the event of any ties during the points competition, the tied individuals will play best out of three rock, paper scissors in the presence of a veteran of each branch of America's armed forces and the First Lady.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BJejtgnFWWc
Presiona para expandir...
God, that show, and legends Of The Hidden Temple got me so hyped because they had kids doing really cool shit.

Like it made you actually want to go and do those things IRL
 
GettrGriftr dijo:
I was told that the Balfour Declaration (written to Lord Rothschild) was issued because the Rothschild family helped finance Britain's war effort since the UK was essentially broke. I mean, the British government was issuing promises to anyone with a couple of bucks to spare.
Presiona para expandir...
Rothschilds did not fund WW1. The Balfour declaration was influenced by Christian Zionism and such
 
GettrGriftr dijo:
I was told that the Balfour Declaration (written to Lord Rothschild) was issued because the Rothschild family helped finance Britain's war effort since the UK was essentially broke. I mean, the British government was issuing promises to anyone with a couple of bucks to spare.
Presiona para expandir...
That too. I was just trying to avoid going off into a ton of on a ton of tangents because as a topic, there's a shit ton to explore.

The UK promised the Jews a state, we promised the Arabs a state at the exact same time, pissing off both but they were still more angry at each other than the UK. A ton of cash was hoovered up pre-war by the building of dreadnoughts to keep ahead of Germany (British naval policy was to have a navy 3 times larger than the next two largest combined) so the British finances were already shot even pre-war. It's easy to say the UK was was just beholden to Jews from the outset but like everything it's more complicated. Even in the declaration itself is funny in how shameless it is.
1751660058802.webp

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Presiona para expandir...
There were 3 sides to the Zionism debate:
1. Pro-British (Wanted to be ruled under the British rather than try to make it on their own, but the state would primarily be led by Jews - Weizmann went to absolutely anyone and everyone in the UK to get them on board. The British Rothschilds also fell into this camp, the French ones opposed Zionism and the German ones were reduced to a small bank in Austria)
2. Bi-nationalists (Most Liberal-minded Zionists. Wanted a state led Palestinians and Jews, independent from anyone)
3. Jews only Zionists (Most Conservative. Wanted a state led by Jews, independent from anyone)

Fun fact, when Zionism was just starting off (late 1890s early 1900s) the original plan was just to fuck off (and fuck them off) to Uganda:
Uganda Scheme
1751659791380.webp

1751659811910.webp
 

ICE increasingly targets undocumented migrants with no criminal record. Washington Post Source​

The Trump administration is increasingly targeting unauthorized immigrants with no criminal record as it ramps up arrests, a Washington Post analysis of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement data shows.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem often touts that ICE officers are arresting the “worst of the worst.” But more than half of those removed from the country since Jan. 20 do not have a criminal conviction. What’s more, as arrests increase, the share of detained migrants with a criminal conviction has been dropping.

The data shows that ICE officers have made more than twice as many arrests from Jan. 20 to June 11 compared with the same period last year. And the number of people taken into custody has shot up over the past month in particular. Since May 20, ICE has averaged nearly 1,000 arrests per day, compared with about 600 in the months prior.

A majority of the undocumented immigrants ICE has arrested during the current Trump administration did not have a criminal conviction. About 40 percent did have a conviction, while another 32 percent had pending charges. Details on those charges and convictions were not available.

Over 60 percent of the undocumented immigrants removed from the country did not have a criminal conviction. Nearly 40 percent did have a conviction, though many of their crimes involved nonviolent offenses.

The proportion of detainees with a criminal conviction has fallen in recent months, the data shows. In January, nearly 46 percent of those detained had been convicted of a crime. By June, that number had dropped to 30 percent.
1751660102784.webp 1751660169107.webp

You can't hate journoscum enough. Newsflash journo, 100% of all illegals are criminals. Every single one entered the country illegally. I for one am sure glad that all these illegals are getting deported, not just the violent one
 
Última edición:
Frank_Jaeger dijo:
Planes are falling out of the sky, 33,000 jobs have been lost in the last month, food prices are about to sky-rocket, Americans are being sent to concentration camps without due process
All because you guys fell for funny /pol/ memes in 2016 and based your whole personality and worldview around misinfo
Presiona para expandir...
As long as it means no trannies, and fewer illegals, I think that’s a fair trade off. :)

Go cry on Reddit, fag.
Catch The Rainbow dijo:
The British led the Jordanian army in the 1948 war and actively blocked arms shipments from entering the region. People saying that the British gave the Israelis a country are misinformed at best.
Presiona para expandir...
Nah. British policy just swing from one extreme to the other, depending on who was in charge. When it were the orientalist in the UK state department, Heebs got screwed hard: “STOP ALL BOATS!”

When it was people like Churchill and fellow Semitephiles (and people who had loans and business with Jews) then it was suddenly “LETS GIVE THE CHOSENS A STATE!” And a full on war against Arab resistance.
Catch The Rainbow dijo:
Israel was a French supported state up until 1963
Presiona para expandir...
Sovietunion also supported its creation. If not for them and the Soviet block voting in the UN, there never would have been an Israel.

You know, it seems that there are people in every country who suddenly and inexplicably start supporting Israel depending on who’s in charge. Weird! Almost as if someone is pushing the same agenda behind the scenes in different countries?
 
NoReturn dijo:
Who funded the creation of the Scofield Reference Bible, Rainbow?
Presiona para expandir...
Alwyn Ball, Jr. of New York
John T. Pirie of Chicago
John Buss of St. Louis
Francis E. Fitch of New York

And Oxford University press. There's no actual record of any Rothschild funding the Scofield Reference Bible.


Why are you trusting anything that this creep says? He looks like a pedophile

EL-UviF5_400x400 (1).webp

GettrGriftr dijo:
[X]
Presiona para expandir...
It's incredibly easy to Google this and see that I'm right. The Rothschilds were surpassed by modern banks by the time WW1 came around
 
Fapcop dijo:
If not for them and the Soviet block voting in the UN, there never would have been an Israel.
Presiona para expandir...
Well actually if you really wanna go into it, it's Hitler remigrating half a million jews into british palestine, who then rose up and started modern day Israel.

Hitler is unironically one of the founding fathers of modern day Israel.
 
Última edición:
Catch The Rainbow dijo:
Rothschilds did not fund WW1. The Balfour declaration was influenced by Christian Zionism and such
Presiona para expandir...
You would need to consider factors pre-WW1. I'm not saying Christian Zionism isn't a thing but you have to consider who actually had more sway or influence with the government and fostered worthwhile connections. Christian Zionism was probably more of a thing in America (Blackstone Memorial) but to say the Balfour declaration was the product of Christian Zionism is yanking too much of the responsibility away from Zionists themselves and pure political pragmatism.

Individual Zionists were operating a ton behind the scenes, building connections, etcetera. Charities also helped a lot with the Zionist image, like the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee.

Edit: For people who dislike FDR, here's another reason to dislike him: Evian Conference.
1751661806433.webp
1751661952648.webp
1751661904486.webp
 
Última edición:
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo