US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I just LOVE seeing my tax dollars pissed away on idiocy.

Still better than paying for 5-star hotels for "migrants", though.

Fuck Canada, Free Alberta NOW!!!
Hang in there! This might be the start of your best chance to shake off a lot of the bullshit you've endured for the past decade.

The people in those red states are just going to roll their eyes anyway. Gas prices are down too so it makes no fucking sense in the first place.
 
Trump lost his appeal in DC for the Judge Boasberg case vs Gangersters

Judge Boasberg issued a order that all deported people must be returned and each and everyone be given a separate chance to appeal their deportation as Trump doesn't have the power to just do mass deportations.

Of course the DC court of appeals found no grounds and that Boasberg is 100% in the right here (shock and surprise!!) so off it goes to the SCOTUS for a final ruling.,

Will Roberts and ACB cuck? Probably. I bet they will find and excuse to rule in the gangsters favor on some obscure legal grounds. Roberts would see America filled to the brim with criminals and drug dealers then have the power of the judiciary diminished in any way.

Imagine ruling that you have to re-import illegal aliens back into your country then give then room and board until you have processed them "properly" and gotten the courts permission to deport them again.

Fuck these Dem judges, fuck them with a rusty stick.
Judges exist to justly interpret governance with the consent of the governed. I don't think they're aware of or would like how close we are to that consent fading.
 
@CaliforniaRaisin

bitch if I had anything more I would put it out there. It's all just insider talk at the moment and Cruz said he was going to investigate it.

The real issue is that cunt of a lawyer is right, AO is doing nothing illegal at all and that's the truth.

And that's the crux of the issue, these fuckers can conspire all they want and it is legal. You can pay a judge to come talk at your event. You can have members in the DC courts and you can issue lawsuits anytime you have grounds.

That the piss off, these cunts are just using the system as intended, they're just trying to subvert the US Federal Executive that's all.

No biggie right?
 
Some news regarding synthetic food dye in the United States.

States move to ban or restrict use of synthetic dyes used in candies and cereal​

Synthetic dyes used to make brightly colored cereals, drinks and candies are coming under scrutiny in states across the country, where lawmakers say the federal government has stalled in taking action despite evidence of harmful effects.

West Virginia, which ranks at the bottom in the U.S. for many health metrics, became the first to sign a sweeping statewide ban on seven such dyes this week. Lawmakers in more than 20 states — from deep red West Virginia to heavily Democratic California — are making a bipartisan push to restrict access to the dyes, which have been tied to neurobehavioral problems in some children and of which U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been an outspoken critic.

“We should not be forced to police our own foods,” said Republican Sen. Laura Wakim Chapman, who heads the Senate’s health committee and told lawmakers the vote might be the most important of their political careers. “No more toxic colors, no more poisoning ourselves and our children. No more unnecessary risks. Our health is not for sale.”

In signing the bill, Republican Gov. Patrick Morrisey referenced Kennedy’s slogan in saying, “There’s no better place to lead the Make America Healthy Again mission.”

The prohibition on certain preservatives and red, blue, green and yellow dyes takes effect for school food in August, and across the state in 2028. It follows narrower bills approved in California last year and Virginia last week that would ban six artificial dyes from being served in public schools beginning in 2027

Why do lawmakers want to see the dyes die?​

Thirty-six color additives are approved by the Federal Drug Administration for use in food and drinks in the U.S. Nine petroleum-based chemical dyes, including Red 3, have been allowed in U.S. food.

Public health advocates have been lobbying for state and federal action for years, pointing to research that links food dyes and other chemical additives to health risks, including exacerbating symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in some children and animal research linking certain additives to cancers.

The European Union and some countries, including Australia and Japan, have banned or restricted the use of certain food dyes because of potential health risks.

In October, dozens of protesters outside the Michigan headquarters of WK Kellogg Co. demanded that the company remove artificial dyes from cereals such as Apple Jacks and Froot Loops. Kellogg announced that it would remove artificial colors and ingredients from its U.S. products by 2018, but never did so, despite making the change in other countries, such as Canada, where Froot Loops are colored with concentrated carrot juice, watermelon juice and blueberry juice.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned Red 3 from the nation’s food supply in January, setting a 2027 deadline for manufacturers to eliminate it from their products. Makers of ingested drugs like cough syrups have until January 2028.

Food industry warns of cost increases​

The National Confectioners Association, a trade group for chocolate, candy, gum and mints sellers, said the new regulations will make food more expensive, less accessible and lead to less variety on grocery store shelves. It said states such as West Virginia, where 1 in 4 children live in poverty and many neighborhoods are “food deserts” with limited access to affordable, nutritious food, will be disproportionately impacted.

Charles Leftwich, vice president of food safety and quality assurance for Sysco Corp., the world’s largest food service distributor, said food safety policies should be supported by science and “be consistently applied across all geographies.”

“We shouldn’t have a fragmented approach when it comes to food safety, because it breeds a lack of trust and confidence with within consumers,” Leftwich said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Changes underway​

School districts in West Virginia have begun phasing out breakfast cereals, strawberry milk or other products in anticipation of the new law’s August deadline.
Chris Derico, who runs Harrison County’s school nutrition program, expects the new regulation to increase costs but said he’s not “in panic mode about it” because none of the products containing the artificial dyes are used in main dishes served to students.

Travis Austin, who leads food service in the Cabell County Schools system, called the policy “a step in the right direction” and said it will be up to manufacturers to rework their formulas to remain competitive.

“It’s all about money,” he said. “If Froot Loops and Lucky Charms aren’t going to change their formulations, then we’re not going to buy them. We’ll buy ones that do.”

Lawmakers in West Virginia, which leads the nation in chronic diseases such as obesity, noted that the dyes are often found in sugary foods.

When the bill passed the state Senate, sponsor Jason Barrett said West Virginia was the first state to approve such a sweeping law but won’t be the last. He cited a bill advancing in Oklahoma that would ban 21 synthetic food dyes and additives.

He said companies prey on low-income consumers and children.

“With passage of this bill, we are saying to big food corporations that the health of our people comes first,” he said.
 
Alberta produces 60% of the crude oil the USA uses, dummy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd4BhXMnlcg You buy oil, which is then refined in America. The signs are pretty correct - if you tariff Canada's oil, you're going to see a spike in gas prices.
Yeah, we're also the only place that can refine Albertan crude oil. That means it's less an America problem and more a Canada problem. Especially since Canada uses Albertan oil profits to bribe the Frenchies and our door is always open to Alberta. Being the 51st state means no tariffs. It would also collapse Canada. So win-win.
 
Canada is being stupid right now trying to fight the trade war. Gas will be more expensive? It's already below 3 bucks in most non fag places, and if it means an extra 20 cents a gallon while still decreasing as things ramp up again, then it's the perfect time to tariff since it's not going to become a serious problem to people's wallets.

Fucking think, you leafs.


As for Trump withdrawing Stefanik as ambassador, just put Ric Grenell in, force the anti-gay countries to bitch about it, and then in retaliation kick the UN out of the country. That will be so perfect, because then some gay place like Toronto will take the Assembly, it will get worse, and Canada will fall faster. This is what I want for Christmas.


But back to Stefanik, this is interesting as it shows Trump doesn't fully trust Johnson to tard wrangle and actually get competent replacements, and Stefanik is a real threat to actually be a speaker replacement if Johnson can't follow through on things. Meatballs try and attack her for not being conservative enough but she actually does fight for the things she wants for MAGA. I'm actually interested to see if Johnson will just finally make Don Bacon get roughed up outside his mistresses' house one day soon just to make him fall in line.
 
New U.S. Department of Homeland Security report finds that tens of housands of unaccompanied minors have gone completely unaccounted for during the Biden admin.

Between 2019-2023, over 31,000 unaccompanied minors were released to addresses that were blank, undeliverable, or missing apartment numbers.

Additionally, more than 43,000 of them failed to appear for scheduled court dates.

Ver archivo adjunto 7144099

The report is archived as an attachment to this post.
We all know where they ended up: in adrenochrome farms
 
People are posting about this shit on LinkedIn, urging people to stand up against it. All comments support the post. Like take that crap out of here. If she is pro hamas, that is a reason to get rid of her. That's like supporting a nazi.

Stop posting this crap on LinkedIn. I need a job not political BS
Here's the Ozturk op-ed:


And in poorly-formatted text:

On March 4, the Tufts Community Union Senate passed 3 out of 4 resolutions demanding that the University acknowledge the Palestinian genocide, apologize for University President Sunil Kumar’s statements, disclose its investments and divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel. These resolutions were the product of meaningful debate by the Senate and represent a sincere effort to hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law. Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.
Unfortunately, the University’s response to the Senate resolutions has been wholly inadequate and dismissive of the Senate, the collective voice of the student body. Graduate Students for Palestine joins Tufts Students for Justice in Palestine, the Tufts Faculty and Staff Coalition for Ceasefire and Fletcher Students for Palestine to reject the University’s response. Although graduate students were not allowed by the University into the Senate meeting, which lasted for almost eight hours, our presence on campus and financial entanglement with the University via tuition payments and the graduate work that we do on grants and research makes us direct stakeholders in the University’s stance.
While an argument may be made that the University should not take political stances and should focus on research and intellectual exchange, the automatic rejection, dismissive nature and condescending tone in the University’s statement have caused us to question whether the University is indeed taking a stand against its own declared commitments to free speech, assembly and democratic expression. According to the Student Code of Conduct, “[a]ctive citizenship, including exercising free speech and engaging in protests, gatherings, and demonstrations, is a vital part of the Tufts community.” In addition, the Dean of Students Office has written, “[w]hile at times the exchange of controversial ideas and opinions may cause discomfort or even distress, our mission as a university is to promote critical thinking, the rigorous examination and discussion of facts and theories, and diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Why then is the University discrediting and disregarding its students who practice the very ideals of critical thinking, intellectual exchange and civic engagement that Tufts claims to represent?
The role of the TCU Senate resolutions is abundantly clear. The Senate’s resolutions serve as a “strong lobbying tool that expresses to the Tufts administration the wants and needs of the student body. They speak as a collective voice and are instrumental in enacting systemic changes.” In this case, the “systemic changes” that the collective voice of the student body is calling for are for the University to end its complicity with Israel insofar as it is oppressing the Palestinian people and denying their right to self-determination — a right that is guaranteed by international law. These strong lobbying tools are all the more urgent now given the order by the International Court of Justice confirming that the Palestinian people of Gaza’s rights under the Genocide Convention are under a “plausible” risk of being breached.
This collective student voice is not without precedent. Today, the University may remember with pride its decision in February 1989 to divest from South Africa under apartheid and end its complicity with the then-racist regime. However, we must remember that the University divested up to 11 years after some of its peers. For instance, the Michigan State University Board of Regents passed resolutions to end its complicity with Apartheid South Africa as early as 1978. Had Tufts heeded the call of the student movement in the late 1970s, the University could have been on the right side of history sooner.
We reject any attempt by the University or the Office of the President to summarily dismiss the role of the Senate and mischaracterize its resolution as divisive. The open and free debate demonstrated by the Senate process (exemplified by the length, open notice and substantive exchange in the proceedings and the non-passing of one of the proposed resolutions), together with the serious organizing efforts of students, warrant credible self-reflection by the Office of the President and the University. We, as graduate students, affirm the equal dignity and humanity of all people and reject the University’s mischaracterization of the Senate’s efforts.
The great author and civil rights champion James Baldwin once wrote: “The paradox of education is precisely this: that as one begins to become conscious one begins to examine the society in which [they are] being educated.” As an educator, President Kumar should embrace efforts by students to evaluate “diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Furthermore, the president should trust in the Senate’s rigorous and democratic process and the resolutions that it has achieved.
We urge President Kumar and the Tufts administration to meaningfully engage with and actualize the resolutions passed by the Senate.
This op-ed was written by Nick Ambeliotis (CEE, ‘25), Fatima Rahman (STEM Education, ‘27), Genesis Perez (English, ‘27) and Rumeysa Ozturk (CSHD, ‘25) and is endorsed by 32 other Tufts School of Engineering and Arts and Sciences Graduate Students.

tl;dr she's one of four credited authors and it's pretty standard acknowledge-the-genocide college girl politics, not exactly "allahu akbar daeth to infidels". If she really got van'd in the street just for this, I expect that even a lot of Joe Average Trump voters aren't going to get behind it. Maybe ICE knows something we don't, but they haven't said much. All I can say is: don't get so caught up in hating immigrants that you forget to hate Israel too.
 
This is why non-Marxist thought will never succeed by the way. Say what you will about the left, at least they're proactive and actually give a shit about their cause.
This is pretty low-hanging fruit even for you. Marxist thought has literally never succeeded. Its core premise (that capitalism will inevitably contradict itself out of existence and pave the way for a communist country) undermines the whole ideology because communism has had to be compelled into existence every time it's come about in history; usually as the result of one or a couple men hijacking a revolution and placing themselves at the top. The societies that follow always turn out to be authoritarian dictatorships that genocide their populace because the logic stemming from the premise is faulty. Karl Marx was a retard and thought that corruption would never happen in communism because collectivists are good little boys and girls and would never try to usurp power because they'd all have an equal utopia. This is why his ideology failed and why he's in hell boiling in liquid shit for eternity.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo