Business US bill would ban TikTok from app stores unless ByteDance divests it - Bipartisan legislation comes amid growing national security concerns tied to its Chinese owner

1709769232274.png
Some US states have already moved to ban downloads of TikTok © Reuters

Demetri Sevastopulo and James Politi in Washington and Hannah Murphy in San Francisco
8 HOURS AGO

Republican and Democratic lawmakers have introduced legislation that would ban app stores from distributing TikTok unless ByteDance, its Chinese owner, divests control of the popular video-sharing platform.

The bipartisan bill from Mike Gallagher, the Republican chair of the House China committee, his Democratic counterpart Raja Krishnamoorthi and 17 lawmakers would give ByteDance 165 days to divest TikTok to avoid the app from being banned.

The measure could have implications for the US election. President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign has started using the video streaming service to try to connect with young voters, even though the White House previously backed a bill that would have given the commerce department the authority to ban apps such as TikTok.

His campaign launched its first TikTok video last month on the day of the Super Bowl, including a Q&A with the president. The first post got more than 10mn views, although none has surpassed that. Most of the posts focus on attacking the mental fitness of former president Donald Trump and Republican extremism.

The bill would also create a process that would enable the president to take action against social media applications controlled by groups that are headquartered or domiciled in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

TikTok said: “This bill is an outright ban of TikTok, no matter how much the authors try to disguise it. This legislation will trample the first amendment rights of 170mn Americans and deprive 5mn small businesses of a platform they rely on to grow and create jobs.”

The Biden administration and the previous Trump administration both identified TikTok as a security risk, partly because Chinese law requires domestic companies to share data when requested by Beijing. Some lawmakers say China could use the platform to spread disinformation to try to meddle with US democracy.

In recent congressional testimony, FBI director Christopher Wray said the streaming service was a tool that was ultimately under the control of the Chinese government and that it “screams out with national security concerns”.

One congressional aide said the bill was a “monumental moment” and that there was a “huge groundswell of bipartisan support” for the measure on Capitol Hill.

Previous congressional efforts to ban TikTok have been unsuccessful, particularly after some lawmakers raised concerns about any prohibition infringing on free speech. Congressional aides said this bill was designed to overcome those barriers.

A second congressional aide said many lawmakers had shifted their view on TikTok and were more willing to risk the wrath of younger voters following classified briefings from officials on the security risks. The legislation would not ban app stores from distributing TikTok in non-US markets, another congressional aide noted.

Some US states are also trying to ban the app. Last year, Montana’s governor signed into law a first-of-its-kind bill that would prohibit app stores from allowing downloads of TikTok in the state. TikTok successfully sued to block the ban on the grounds that it was unconstitutional, and Montana is appealing against the ruling.

In January, Republican lawmakers grilled TikTok chief executive Shou Zi Chew over whether the group has ties to China, which he denied. TikTok has tried to distance itself from ByteDance by investing more than $1.5bn on “Project Texas”, a restructuring plan it insists protects user data and content from China’s influence.

TikTok has been banned from government devices in the US, UK, Canada and the EU.

Source (Archive)

TikTok's statement:
1709769365418.png
Source (Archive)

Rep. Mike Collins' response:
1709769344753.png
GIAMOpKXcAAtOpw.jpg
Source (Archive)
 
Apple fan by any chance? Honor 5C was a quality phone that cost me 100 quid. Fast as fuck, great camera (HD chink spying) and never crashed.
If you’re buying $100 phones you’re buying old tech. You should be comparing it to older phones, not present flagships. No one is threatened by their budget phones but there’s no reason to allow a company that stole Samsung’s folding screen tech (amongst many other things) access to the American market.
They're all shit, but i see normies watching tiktok and not instragram or jewtube. Tiktok is also free.
We’re talking about what would happen after a ban. Also, all of them are free.
Pure cope. Cope I have huffed on since 2004. I wish social media would die, but it's 20 years old and still kicking.
There’s a reason why Facebook is called Boomerbook and why no one talks about Snapchat anymore. Every generation picks a new social media site, they don’t want to use the same one as their parents. The only site with any cross-generational staying power has been YouTube.
 
If you’re buying $100 phones you’re buying old tech. You should be comparing it to older phones, not present flagships. No one is threatened by their budget phones but there’s no reason to allow a company that stole Samsung’s folding screen tech (amongst many other things) access to the American market.
Of course i'm buying old tech. What kind of consoomer brained dipshit spends top money on chink-made products that retail at 100x their cost of manufacture?

They were threatened. Huawei ate big chunks out of the market share of samsung and apple.

lol, foldable phones. Imagine thinking that tech is owned by a company when it follows the same principles as a book and the phones don't even work.

We’re talking about what would happen after a ban. Also, all of them are free.
Doesn't jewtube and instagram slam adverts in unless you pay?
There’s a reason why Facebook is called Boomerbook and why no one talks about Snapchat anymore. Every generation picks a new social media site, they don’t want to use the same one as their parents. The only site with any cross-generational staying power has been YouTube.
Anyone who uses the term boomer is a fucking faggot that's been brainwashed by cooming and coonsoooming.
While I agree with your sentiment, it is pure corporate ball-washing cope to think social media will go anywhere. And I say this as someone who believed just that for 10 years.
Social media is the new radio. It will never die and will be here forever.

Remind me again who owns instagram? New boss, same as the old boss.
 
True. I think people underestimate how tech-stunted the general public actually is, especially those who exclusively use smartphones. They are tunneled into recognizable platforms. They can't conceive of downloading an APK from a website or using an alternative app store.
Everytime I try telling my mom why I prefer Android over Apple phones, it completely flies over her head. She doesn't understand why I'd want to install other app stores or easily mess with stuff Apple won't allow you to. Also, Apple started the trend of removing headphone jacks and SD card slots.
 
You might say that this was a long time coming due to national security concerns.; you might even agree with the decision because the majority of TikTok's content is mindless slop for swarthy automata.; what I can say is that I recall reading and seeing articles from accredited new sources that target TikTok (among other social media platforms) for it's role in spreading 'disinformation' among the youth. And while Facebook can be relegated as a nursing home for dementia patients, while 4chan can persist as a honeypot/haven for degenerate porn, while Xitter can get ADL'd, China is not beholden to the same priors that Congress and the overarching political structure of the United States, and so it must be neutered or shut down.

I would hate to defend TikTok, and it's passing does not terribly upset me, but understand that Congress is not doing this with benevolent intentions.
 
True. I think people underestimate how tech-stunted the general public actually is, especially those who exclusively use smartphones. They are tunneled into recognizable platforms. They can't conceive of downloading an APK from a website or using an alternative app store.
This short fat curly haired mutt I worked with over the holiday season was like this anyways I showed the stupid little niglet how to download new pipe so I can stop hearing his YouTube ads blasting in between his garbage music at work. Is faggot ass still continued using YouTube because he was unfamiliar with the layout of newpipe
 
This short fat curly haired mutt I worked with over the holiday season was like this anyways I showed the stupid little niglet how to download new pipe so I can stop hearing his YouTube ads blasting in between his garbage music at work. Is faggot ass still continued using YouTube because he was unfamiliar with the layout of newpipe
Good grief. My condolences.
 
Good grief. My condolences.
I'll never forget how he quit his job like a week later he threw a stack of papers on the ground and said how am I supposed to pick these up with my tiny baby hands and then he stormed out of the building however the bus wasn't running at the time to the halfway house that he lived at so he stormed back into the building sat in the lunch room crying because he said his probation officer was on the way.
As bad as niggers are them multi-colored ones are worse
 
The ban is too late. What tiktok did in these past few years has irrevocably ruined the internet and with it, thousands of users' braincells. Banning it now wouldn't matter, China already weakened everyone involved for them to make their next move.
Those people were already retarded. Did you forget how stupid the average user of social media was pre-Tiktok?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo