Unpopular trans-related opinions

Adrenochrome Dreams

kiwifarms.net
Registrado
1 de Ago, 2022
  • I don’t necessarily boycott companies or celebrities just because they are into trans ideology. They are entitled to believe whatever they want. It’s their own business. I only care if they rabidly hate “terfs”.
  • Boycotting just for having an opposite opinion to yourself is cancelling behaviour, just like we criticise troons for. While I’m not against it if the target is deserved, I don’t really want to partake unless it’s strategic and worthwhile.
  • Dylan Mulvaney didn’t deserve the backlash - he didn’t actually do anything wrong. Like multiple influencers, he was given a personalised beer can to promote Budweiser on his social media, which he duly did. The backlash against transgenderism overall is deserved, but Mulvaney was an unfortunate target. I mean, he maintains his personal hygiene and has never committed a sex crime, which automatically puts him in the top 1% of troons.
  • I sometimes lack sympathy for trans teens. They are ruining their lives and health, but it’s their own fault for being so self-obsessed. I reserve full sympathy for any FtMs who have suffered sex crimes.
  • Some trans pass. Rarely. But no tranny can pass 100% of the time.
  • JK Rowling is an insufferable woke twat outside her heroic tervery. She also had an exceptionally middle class background but pretends to have suffered poverty.

What are yours?
 
Boycotting just for having an opposite opinion to yourself is cancelling behaviour, just like we criticise troons for. While I’m not against it if the target is deserved, I don’t really want to partake unless it’s strategic and worthwhile.
I personally wouldn't call it cancelling. People who oppose my views are perfectly welcome to do so, and publicly, I simply won't buy products endorsed by troons.
JK Rowling is an insufferable woke twat outside her heroic tervery. She also had an exceptionally middle class background but pretends to have suffered poverty.
J.K. Rowling is absolutely insufferable, yes. I have no idea what point you're trying to make outside of that.
 
Dylan Mulvaney didn’t deserve the backlash - he didn’t actually do anything wrong. Like multiple influencers, he was given a personalised beer can to promote Budweiser on his social media, which he duly did. The backlash against transgenderism overall is deserved, but Mulvaney was an unfortunate target. I mean, he maintains his personal hygiene and has never committed a sex crime, which automatically puts him in the top 1% of troons.
I'm so tired of political boycotts and am inclined to agree. The boycotters overreacting to this was honestly funnier that Mulvaney's regular bullshit.
 
There's actually nothing wrong with trans people - To be specific, people with chromosomal disorders. I think most of the Farms really just despises pedophiles and groomers who happen to be transgender. It just happens that an alarming number of pedophiles, groomers, and porn-addicted degenerates are self-identified trans.
 
Última edición:
I personally wouldn't call it cancelling. People who oppose my views are perfectly welcome to do so, and publicly, I simply won't buy products endorsed by troons.
Trans people can disagree with you
You can disagree with trans people

But guess who might lose their job over this? See where i'm going?
 
Not reading the OP, I don't really care. Anyways my unpopular opinion is that Voldemort is very-much troon-coded. Think about it; He was conceived through unconsensual means, he doesn't understand love or what it means to love someone, and he attacks kids.
 
I'm so tired of political boycotts and am inclined to agree. The boycotters overreacting to this was honestly funnier that Mulvaney's regular bullshit.
I don't think it was so much the fact that Dylan mulvaney got the beer can, it was the fact that the woman who was in charge of Bud lights marketing department, which had been the number one beer in America for so many years specifically because it catered to white trash and frat boys, she said that she didn't want the brand catering to white trash and frat boys.
It was the disrespect of the people who were brand loyal to the product who were actually boycotting it. The other people online who never drank Bud light before were just making noise because an annoying faggot was wearing the black face equivalent of a woman and saying that he was a little girl.
Fuck them though for calling us white trash and frat boys. That's why Coors participated in pride month and all that other bullshit and I had no problem switching over to their brand. I don't care what they do for gay people so long as they never personally insulted me and told me they no longer wanted my business.
Also my own overall unpopular opinion about transgender people is I don't care if people are transgender, so long as they did not transition until after they were an adult. To me there is no such thing as a transgender youth, or a gay kid, or any of that other bullshit.
I think whatever you do behind closed doors and in the privacy of your own home when you're over the legal age is none of my business. I just don't want it thrown in my goddamn face or my kid's faces every time we're out in polite society.
 
You guys have it good when the worst thing that can happen to you is cancelation and loss of job

See, i live in a lefty country. Here, racism is a crime, and not even applicable fine. Now someway, somehow, a few years ago the troon lobby managed to get transphobia in the same bracket as racism

So if i'm minding my own business and some mentally ill man gets on my face and i call him a tranny, and i'm reported to the police, i'll get cuffed, i'll get thrown in jail. Even if i get some leeway being a first offense and get an ankle monitoring bracelet and house arrest, i'll be forever an ex con. Lots of doors closed, forever an ex con

Life ruined because i called a faggot a faggot. Don't take your freedom of speech for granted, some countries have no such thing when they get the troon cancer on the judicial system

That's why i avoid these people like the plague
 
"Pooner" is an obnoxious and unnecessary term. It was much easier when "troon" referred to both sexes of delusional idiots.

Women pretending to be men are delusional, stupid, and perverted, and get way too much sympathy and excuses made for them. I do not want to use a term that originated from them/is popular with them. I am laughing at them, not with them.
 
HSTS and AGP aren't mutually exclusive: lots of gay troons fetishise the idea of being women and lots of AGPs fuck men if those men indulge their fetish for them. It's generally those two types, but there is overlap.

And No Pet Troons. I sympathise with some troons and get along with them when we're talking about shit other than trans, but I don't want them in the opposite sex's spaces or to be an exception to any rules. It's not okay for them to violate boundaries just because they're "the good ones".
 
The troon issue is actually an opportunity to end the unnecessary battle of the sexes that intensified during the 2010s.

The 2010s really made fools out of so many people. Lib feminist grifters like Anita Sarkeesian, left wing Jack Thompsons, etc. And on the other end, you had plenty of right wing incels and contrarians who doubled down on their misogyny and gooner crap in order to own the feminists.

TERFs are wrong about a lot of things, they can even be downright hypocritical at times. But I think most of them oppose the troon movement for the right reasons, and even many of the same reasons why conservatives and moderates do. We're not doing ourselves any favors by alogging them, especially not since, again, TERFs are not the same lib feminist handmaidens that we dealt with during the 2010s.
 
HSTS and AGP aren't mutually exclusive: lots of gay troons fetishise the idea of being women and lots of AGPs fuck men if those men indulge their fetish for them. It's generally those two types, but there is overlap.

And No Pet Troons. I sympathise with some troons and get along with them when we're talking about shit other than trans, but I don't want them in the opposite sex's spaces or to be an exception to any rules. It's not okay for them to violate boundaries just because they're "the good ones".
I was literally about to post both of these, so now I'm wondering just how unpopular they really are.

Edit: I guess I'll add my own unpopular opinion, which is that HSTS troons don't pass any better than AGP troons do. Looking gay isn't the same as looking female.
this is probably pretty unpopular but i think op is a faggot
She's generally pretty ok, but one time she said this in the RDS thread
But anyone using “poverty” to describe the UK is cringe. Poverty is what war-affected refugees or starving third worlders experience, not Brits temporarily on unemployment benefits in the 1990’s.
and got bombarded with trash cans, and she's apparently still mad about it over a month later.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Some trans pass.
I agree with this, but consider that an artist can paint an image of a beautiful women on a canvas. The image can look just like a real life woman, but it's not a woman, it's a canvas. With enough makeup, surgery, hormones etc. yeah, a man can look just like a woman, but so can a canvas.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo