- Registrado
- 25 de Sep, 2014
I'd rather give kids something to really think about, or freak them out for years...Most E/I cartoons were mediocre autism bait at BEST and I dont want to see them come back
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
I'd rather give kids something to really think about, or freak them out for years...Most E/I cartoons were mediocre autism bait at BEST and I dont want to see them come back
That was awesomeI'd rather give kids something to really think about, or freak them out for years...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WppJEf3ZtFU
The PBS of 40 years ago was nothing like the PBS of now.That was awesome
I don't mean total shovelware just meant to barely comply with it, but more things like before the bug even existed but that would have qualified, like Mr. Rogers in particular, although Captain Kangaroo would be a classic example from network TV. I mean if Barney & Friends qualified, CK would definitely have. And I'm not picking on Barney in particular, which I would actually consider a relatively good show for small children especially.Most E/I cartoons were mediocre autism bait at BEST and I dont want to see them come back
It gets better as it goes on. Honestly.Started watching The Batman (2004) and I consider it serviceable. By that I mean, it's fine to show it to children, but the storytelling is far more formulaic and quippy. I know Joss Whedon didn't write this show, but characters do feel the need to have one-liners, even Mister Freeze, who is more like the Arnold version than the Michael Ansara version. Alfred is better here, but it comes at the cost of every character getting simplified. I get the distinct feeling that this show doesn't come anywhere close to even bad TAS episodes.
So, if you've got to show children a Batman show, show TAS. Better acting, better stories, better score.
I'll admit Ethan Bennett's arc does approach--but not match--TAS in quality, but it's a show that gets quippier the longer it goes on because of Batgirl. I try not to hate her because I'm sure Dick Grayson was also the corny sidekick in previous iterations. It's also a show that relies way too much on Joker. I get that actors want to play him because he's very performance-oriented, but he restricts a lot of storytelling avenues because he has a specific way of going about plots. It feels like this show is mostly divorced from older cinema. I'm pretty sure 2004 isn't going to have a room trashing scene like Simon Trent did or Bullock and Montoya in a Rashomon episode. It's a show that more comparable to Batman Beyond, where the gadgets are the most interesting thing in the show.It gets better as it goes on. Honestly.
The kids who liked the live action stuff were always weirdI know this is a thread for animation but live action shit was probably never good, well most of the live action shows, I think Nickelodeon could've been off better without Dan Schneider shit, but between Nickelodeon and Disney, I think Disney had the better ones.
Edit - Also fuck that 2015 Boomerang reboot.
I was always more of a animation kid growing up, I can firmly say that. Also lmao, that is kind of true, some of them are probably junkies now, or living in their mother's basement getting high and shit, or probably begging online for money with Youtube as their only source of income cause they have a refusal to get a damn job.The kids who liked the live action stuff were always weird
Idk man all the kids I knew that were mainly into stuff like Hannah Montana, Big Time Rush etc all turned out fairly normal and left that shit behind at age 12 (the shows sucking and being ugly probably make letting go easier) with some occasional nostalgia, while it's pretty much only cartoon fans I see obsessing over their childhood shows way into adulthood.The kids who liked the live action stuff were always weird
I'd like to think because of high budget shit nowadays, every thing has become 3d now, plus it'd be a lot more harder to make a lot of fantasy/futuristic things with how it'd take much actual time probably more than 3d with how you have to make actual props and shit. Probably not the right answer but it's a guess.Not exaclty an opinion about animation but, I really despise the fact that by nearly a decade the standard is that if a work is about a slice of life sitcom, it will be animated, but if it will be an Hard Sci-Fi or High Fantasy, it will be "live action", man... What the Real Fuck? Why this still happen when it should be the complete opposite? If someone can give an explaination it, I'm open to know, because I really want to understand why we don't go full animated with Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres anymore while something more realistic that could work better on physical sets pratically went the way of dinossaurs ...dinossaurs
I always liked all of them too. they're pretty goofy and very of the era but when I was a kid watching it I didn't give a shit and thought they were cool too. There's potential there it's kinda retarded they've never tried to update any of them and throw them in the big boy justice league books and they've been relegated to old cartoon purgatory.I don't hate the "affirmative action" characters. In fact, I kind of like them. This show did it right by creating new diversity characters instead of race-swapping like is done today. I don't understand why DC hasn't brought them into their comics proper.
Sad part was that many were updated in both Justice League Unlimited and Young Justice, DC just never tried to follow up from them:I always liked all of them too. they're pretty goofy and very of the era but when I was a kid watching it I didn't give a shit and thought they were cool too. There's potential there it's kinda retarded they've never tried to update any of them and throw them in the big boy justice league books and they've been relegated to old cartoon purgatory.