Unpopular opinions about history/geopolitics

Registrado
14 de Mayo, 2019
Turks are White and the Ottoman Empire was the best hope for fine White Grecians and based Yugoslavs to impose their Chad warlord religion on Europe and unite Rum. The Ottoman Empire is based and was the good guy against the Russian Asiatic subhumans and their idolatry.
 
The Holy Roman Empire was Rome's rightful successor.
James k. Polk was America's best president.
France's surrender in 1940 was a reasonable thing to do.
The Italian royal air force preformed a lot better in World War II then most people give them credit
Myanmar is a very interesting place historically.
The Iran-Iraq war is one of the more interesting recent wars to of had happened.
 
1. Quite a few nations famous for their military should instead be famous for propaganda. Their military track records are average to subpar, and rarely as dangerous as their enemies feared. Some of the examples are Sparta, Russia, and China. Sparta's track record is slightly below average, and they rarely won any wars alone. Through a good chunk of history they were puppets or partners of Persians as a counterweight to Athens, Thebes, and Macedon. Russia often needed help of another major power to win any war that was not against an opponent that was magnitudes weaker on paper and even struggled with reigning in Chechen. Chinese were conquered by foreign invaders multiple times, and back in the 80s they were humiliated in a war against Vietnam. However, all of these nations were good at propagandizing and especially playing up their military power.

2. Mongols were not as powerful or meritocratic as many say. They spent decades trying to subjugate China, and their successes in Europe were reliant on outnumbering their opponents and surprise attacks, usually on weak nations struggling with internal crises. Mighty mongols did not do so hot once they had to face proper European knights. When Hungary recovered from Cuman crisis and finished their reforms, and Poland ended its civil wars, they were able to halt Mongolian invasions. If you lived within the Mongol empire, your were more likely to become a slave or get executed than rise within their "meritocratic" system.

3. China and Middle East were not as far ahead of Europe in 1200s and 1300s as it's often made out to be. At least in some areas like military tech for example. Mongolians were able to crush Chinese and Arab cities and fortresses, and yet they failed against European castles. That's despite having siege engineers from China and Middle East in their ranks.

4. World would not be a high tech utopia if Christianity never took off. Quite the contrary. After western Roman empire fell, it was often the church that was the one to pick up the pieces and preserve as much knowledge as possible. Public education, libraries, universities, scientific method, artwork, agricultural innovations, and much more developed thanks to the church. Later, many great minds of enlightenment were motivated by religion. They believed that the best way to honor God is to study his creation.
And medieval period was not nearly as "dark" as it is made out to be.

Russia was a mistake. t. a Finn
It's kind of hard to argue with this. Russians were the first commie nation. They promoted Marxism and critical theory abroad, thus leading to the current wave of globohomo. They signed Treaty of Rapallo in 1922 that let German military secretly train and build up in Russia to bypass Versailles Treaty for 11 years, basically handing Hitler tools to start World War 2.
 
Última edición:
The British are the villains of history.

Even after two nukes, Japan got off easy after WW2, in spite of the fact that they were every bit as vicious and racist as the Nazis.
 
Última edición:
- Russia was never much of a treat. The UK and US kept them in WWII when Germany invaded them. They were flooded with supplies that allowed them to dump man power into making Germany run out of gas. Germany was forced to fight a war on multiple fronts, and Russia only had them to fight, wouldn't open a front with Japan, and without lendlease supplies, couldn't sustain itself. Russia gets too much credit in WWII. Also I'm tired of hearing of the Russian winter, fairly certain it's US post WWII propaganda to further devalue Russia. Germany and Russia have similar enough weather (at least where the fighting was) that that issue was never "the winter" and more an extention of supply issues. Germany knew what they were facing because they face it back home.

- Japan would have fought to the last person and any "historian" or person knowledgeable on history saying otherwise is being willfully ignorant to the mountain of evidence we found even after Japan did their best to clear their browser history after they realized we were going to open a glass blowing business in every major city they had.
 
Indian removal was a justifiable policy, because if we didn't conquer this land, someone else would have. It was populated with Stone Age barbarians; they were doomed.
If you are talking about THE Indian Removal Act, it’s unpopular because every part of what you just said is factually wrong.

The Five Civilized Tribes were called civilized for a reason. They were already settled agriculturalists long before Whitey arrived. By the time of Indian Removal they were vassals of the United States, enclaves, with constititional governments, widespread adoption of Christianity, widespread literacy (Cherokees invented their own writing system from scratch and ran a tribal newspaper), market economies based around plantation agriculture, and Indian chiefs wearing top hats. The only difference between them and their neighbors was their language and their tone of skin. They were essentially Indians who did a little Meiji Restoration and Westernized themselves, which is why even Americans of the time (Davy Crockett himself included) knew it was bullshit and almost killed the bill.
 
If you are talking about THE Indian Removal Act, it’s unpopular because every part of what you just said is factually wrong.

The Five Civilized Tribes were called civilized for a reason. They were already settled agriculturalists long before Whitey arrived. By the time of Indian Removal they were vassals of the United States, enclaves, with constititional governments, widespread adoption of Christianity, widespread literacy (Cherokees invented their own writing system from scratch and ran a tribal newspaper), market economies based around plantation agriculture, and Indian chiefs wearing top hats. The only difference between them and their neighbors was their language and their tone of skin. They were essentially Indians who did a little Meiji Restoration and Westernized themselves, which is why even Americans of the time (Davy Crockett himself included) knew it was bullshit and almost killed the bill.
We should have put the blacks on reservations after the Civil War, too.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo