Ultimate Argument for Violent Accelerationism

[Boldizar]

So, as far as we can see, there are only two options for white civilization:
1. To slowly decay without revolution, dying permanently and painfully
2. A revolution/civil war that liberates white countries, very painful short-term but extremely beneficial long-term
Second option is clearly better. However, the earlier second option is done, the better will be the results.
Nonwhite share of population grows every year with no way of reversing or stopping it without completely destroying current government system. More nonwhites means it will be harder to win, and nonwhites might capture parts of the country, leading to city-state enclaves that will require decades to eliminate. Also, the longer nonwhites stay there, the more they feel attached. First or second generation migrants will just run away to their relatives in home countries; third and fourth generation migrants highly likely will not.
So, we get 2 principles:
1. Revolution is the only way to survive.
2. The earlier it happens, the easier and less bloody is will be, and we will have better demographic, economic and human rights outcomes than if it happens later.

 

[Perfect Day]

So, we get 2 principles:
1. Revolution is the only way to survive.
2. The earlier it happens, the easier and less bloody is will be

Yes because you would get killed immediately. You're a tranime faggot with a pink triangle

 

[Skitarii]

So, as far as we can see, there are only two options for white civilization:

1. Go to Church
2. Have big familes

/thread

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Also, the longer nonwhites stay there, the more they feel attached.

Who cares if they feel attached?

Also plenty of failed revolutions in the past. You might as easily hasten demise when one is poorly timed.

 

[JohnnyG]

If "accelerationism" means "help your enemies win and make things worse so people rise up", the best case against it is places like the Soviet Union lasting decades before everything finally collapsed. South Africa has been accelerating for 30+ years, and still has ShitLibs who live behind electrified fences while supporting the "Rainbow Nation".

A more realistic plan might be localized accelerationism in blue areas, while improving red ones. Let NY, NJ, MD, and IL get more radical, crime-filled, and unbearable for conservatives/taxpayers. Make red states as conservative as possible so Progs find them unbearable and won't follow with their cancerous politics.

Blue areas will lose population and national influence, while red ones thrive. Blues become irrelevant nationally, or maybe America becomes semi-autonomous regions with a weak central government. Either way, Progs don't get to ruin functioning areas (something they must do, because any alternative shows how awful their system is).

 

[Blasterisk]

I just want the accelerationists on all sides to accelerate whatever it is they're doing onto each other and then normal people can live in peace. Is that so much to ask?

 

[Male Idiot]

Yes in Meinkampf, I mean Minecraft.

But wait until Israel is 50% pajeet for extra lulz.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

Question (I’m being sincere): Has accelerationisn ever lead to a good outcome?

So, we get 2 principles:
1. Revolution is the only way to survive.
2. The earlier it happens, the easier and less bloody is will be, and we will have better demographic, economic and human rights outcomes than if it happens later.

This is how it would have been for the Confederates. Every year that ticked by that they postured and sputtered and threatened to secede was another year that the Fenian hordes and the learned elders of Boston had to gain strength.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Question (I’m being sincere): Has accelerationisn ever lead to a good outcome?

I can't think of any. It pretty much just always leads to a lot of needless deaths and suffering.

The only violent revolution that didn't turn out that way is the American one and I think that's because it wasn't the same radical break from the past. The Americans were fighting for what they considered their traditional rights as Englishmen, with independence being the last resort due to Britain's unwillingness to address their grievances.

It's not like France or Russia where the revolutionaries wanted to create an entirely new social and economic order

This is how it would have been for the Confederates. Every year that ticked by that they postured and sputtered and threatened to secede was another year that the Fenian hordes and the learned elders of Boston had to gain strength.

Yeah, the South's best bet for independence would have been the 1830s. Once Virginia dropped out of the top 3 states by population the game was over, they just kept losing ground.

Interesting to think what Mexico would do in that situation.

 

[Tetra]

If "accelerationism" means "help your enemies win and make things worse so people rise up", the best case against it is places like the Soviet Union lasting decades before everything finally collapsed. South Africa has been accelerating for 30+ years, and still has ShitLibs who live behind electrified fences while supporting the "Rainbow Nation".

A more realistic plan might be localized accelerationism in blue areas, while improving red ones. Let NY, NJ, MD, and IL get more radical, crime-filled, and unbearable for conservatives/taxpayers. Make red states as conservative as possible so Progs find them unbearable and won't follow with their cancerous politics.

Blue areas will lose population and national influence, while red ones thrive. Blues become irrelevant nationally, or maybe America becomes semi-autonomous regions with a weak central government. Either way, Progs don't get to ruin functioning areas (something they must do, because any alternative shows how awful their system is).

pretty much this
society isn't a bar that once its filled up everyone just rise up.
Most people just want today to be like yesterday
so if you make yesterday a little bit shittier than the day before, you can make today a little bit shittier than yesterday and so on

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

I can't think of any. It pretty much just always leads to a lot of needless deaths and suffering.

The only violent revolution that didn't turn out that way is the American one and I think that's because it wasn't the same radical break from the past. The Americans were fighting for what they considered their traditional rights as Englishmen, with independence being the last resort due to Britain's unwillingness to address their grievances.

It's not like France or Russia where the revolutionaries wanted to create an entirely new social and economic order

That’s pretty much the consensus in the institutional Econ stuff I read. The colonies are de facto independent countries in a personal union with Britain, though de juee that’s not how they would have put it. The revolution really does radicalize, but the substance of it is fourteen nations fighting independence wars/defending themselves from invasion with cross-class unity instead of an actual social revolution.

 

[debristar]

You're a tranime faggot with a pink triangle

guys, i've identified another female

 

[No-Eyed Square Guy]

A more realistic plan might be localized accelerationism in blue areas, while improving red ones.

"Globohomo" (let's call it) has anticipated this potentially workable geographical resistance and distributed its brown hordes accordingly.

See, e.g., the jeetification of Texas, the British government's project to plant muslims in every "shire" (they even gave the project a villainous name I can't remember), sending the Somalis to Minnesota, etc.

California was the first American state destroyed because it was white people heaven. It's where I'm from, and I'm almost old enough to really remember it. My parents moved us out of there because...

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

Feel free to accelerate the end of western dominance, that ought to be a good show.

 

[GayRapistWithAIDs]

Accelerationism is gay, and retarded. You need to look no further then South Africa for proof, plenty of white libs still there voting for there literal genocide.

 

[Tom Peters]

But wait until Israel is 50% pajeet for extra lulz.

Accelerate this. Israel needs to share the burden of the elite human capital.

 

[Male Idiot]

It worked out for the soviets for a time. Putting the first satellite and the first man in space isn't something Ngubu and his stick hut does.

 

[nycifer]

I want to see a revolution take off, just to see how poorly orchestrated it'll be for the people on the "right side of history". Then we'll have a few less dumb fuckers around, which means more air, more employment and more opportunity! Hey, they ARE doing something for a better cause!

 

[Boldizar]

Yes because you would get killed immediately. You're a tranime faggot with a pink triangle

No one wears pink triangle and pfp in real life sir, take your meds

1. Go to Church
2. Have big familes

/thread

A jew conscripts all of your sons and cocaine spics mince your daughters into sausages. What Timmy gon do?

Who cares if they feel attached?

Also plenty of failed revolutions in the past. You might as easily hasten demise when one is poorly timed.

A failed revolution will show that mass uprising is possible, this preparing ground for successful one a couple years later (or even months). Better than going to MIGA rally and sperging about "Le evil extremists" while your country continues to rot.

If "accelerationism" means "help your enemies win and make things worse so people rise up", the best case against it is places like the Soviet Union lasting decades before everything finally collapsed. South Africa has been accelerating for 30+ years, and still has ShitLibs who live behind electrified fences while supporting the "Rainbow Nation".

Whites always were a minority in South Africa. Europe and USA are far whiter than SA.

A more realistic plan might be localized accelerationism in blue areas, while improving red ones. Let NY, NJ, MD, and IL get more radical, crime-filled, and unbearable for conservatives/taxpayers. Make red states as conservative as possible so Progs find them unbearable and won't follow with their cancerous politics.

And suddenly, a pro-immigration president gets elected in fake elections and your red area turns into brown area really quick.

Blue areas will lose population and national influence, while red ones thrive. Blues become irrelevant nationally, or maybe America becomes semi-autonomous regions with a weak central government. Either way, Progs don't get to ruin functioning areas (something they must do, because any alternative shows how awful their system is).

All of this while white population continues to decline and subhuman spics and jeets continue to flood into the country. Meanwhile revolution will allow you to stop caring about jewish laws, so you'll be able to kill and expel millions of shitskins while also exporting your revolution to Europe.

I can't think of any. It pretty much just always leads to a lot of needless deaths and suffering.

It will be even worse without revolution. You're basically going to be enslaved by the kike state, and at this point it will be even harder to win.

Yeah, the South's best bet for independence would have been the 1830s. Once Virginia dropped out of the top 3 states by population the game was over, they just kept losing ground.

Our war is not about owning or not owning nigger slaves, it's about survival.

Interesting to think what Mexico would do in that situation.

It's owned by kikes so it will try to "invade" America. They will utilize cartel members and spics living in US as their footsoldiers, leading to spic marocchinate in southwestern states and perhaps even parts of Florida.

Accelerationism is gay, and retarded. You need to look no further then South Africa for proof, plenty of white libs still there voting for there literal genocide.

South Africa is minority white, which makes accelerationism and destabilization benefit nigger majority.

Feel free to accelerate the end of western dominance, that ought to be a good show.

"Western dominance" already ended. The revolution is needed to retake control over white homelands at least.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

A failed revolution will show that mass uprising is possible,

Delusional optimism. A failed revolution leads to justified oppression. There's a mandate after a failed revolution.