CN UK intel says Wuhan Lab theory is plausable

British intelligence agencies have deemed the theory that the deadly coronavirus leaked from a lab in China to be “feasible,” according to a report.


After initially claiming there was only a “remote” chance that the pandemic originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a reassessment led British officials to increase the likelihood to “feasible,” the Sunday Times of London reported.


“There might be pockets of evidence that take us one way, and evidence that takes us another way. The Chinese will lie either way. I don’t think we will ever know,” the newspaper quoted a source as saying.


The new assessment by British spies comes on the heels of President Biden announcing last week that he has ordered the US intelligence community to conduct a 90-day investigation into whether COVID was released by the Chinese lab.


1622488170601.png

Researchers working next to a cage with mice inside the P4 laboratory in Wuhan, China.JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images

1622488204821.png


Security personnel keep watch outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology during the visit by the World Health Organization on Feb. 3, 2021.REUTERS/Thomas Peter/File Photo


“As of today, the U.S. Intelligence Community has ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios’ but has not reached a definitive conclusion on this question,” Biden said, referring to the two dominant theories – a lab leak or animal-to-human transmission at a market in Wuhan.


Biden’s giving the intelligence community another three months to continue the inquiry comes after CNN reported he ended an investigation into whether coronavirus began in a lab in the spring.


The lab theory began to gain steam when the Wall Street Journal reported on May 23 that three workers at the Wuhan lab became so ill in November 2019 that they had to be hospitalized.

1622488217732.png

This aerial view shows the P4 laboratory on the campus of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.HECTOR RETAMAL/AFP via Getty Images

The first reports of the coronavirus outbreak came out of Wuhan a month later.


The Times report prompted UK’s Vaccines Minister Nadhim Zahawi to push the World Health Organization to more thoroughly investigate the origins of the virus that has killed more than 3.5 million worldwide.


“I think it’s really important that the WHO is allowed to conduct its investigation unencumbered into the origins of this pandemic and that we should leave no stone unturned to understand why – not only because of the current pandemic that has swept the world but also for future-proofing the world’s capability to deal with pandemics,” he told Sky News.

1622488248027.png

A worker is seen inside the P4 laboratory in Wuhan. UK intelligence agencies reportedly called the COVID-19 leak from the lab “feasible.”JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images

If the beginnings of COVID cannot be determined, “this could happen again and we are one wet market or bio lab away from the next spillover,” a diplomatic source told the Sunday Times.

Link
 
So it is 100% true then, they just needed time to kill their political rivals (President Trump) and consolidate power further before priming the public with the idea that China did in fact do this. And likely with Western support or oversight.
 
Nuh uh I heard from the impeccable and irreproachable news muhdia intelligence service that the lab leak theory was racist lying from the bad orange man and it couldnt possibly be true
 
Noone denied the lab theory as "impossible" - everyone called it "unlikely", else it would've been a huge scandal with the CDC and other mediniggers openly lying to everyone.
Politifact labeled the idea as debunked and a pants on fire lie.
 
Politifact labeled the idea as debunked and a pants on fire lie.
Politifact is not a valuable international entity and anyone who links it unironically thinking it's a valid source should commit Ronnie McNutt.
 
I believed the lab theory before the CancerAids took father Jim. When he was streaming about it in February 2020. China laws are lax and I can see a contaminated animal making its way to a wet market. Through scientists selling animals at the wet market on the side for extra money or merchants from the wet market rummaging through a bio labs waste for disposed of specimens to unknowing customers at the wet market. The labs waste probably wasn't secure enough (if at all). These theories came to mind during Jim's streams.
 
Politifact is not a valuable international entity and anyone who links it unironically thinking it's a valid source should commit Ronnie McNutt.
Politifact isnt no one though and 99% of the media 99% of Democratic politicians 50% of political organizations and 50% of the public think its word is holy writ so saying no one said or believed it impossible is wrongerino pants on fire 4 pinocchio noses

No way it came from a lab that's a racist conspiracy theory was the only allowed opinion for a year and there were consequences for saying otherwise that's not no one those consequences didnt come down from on high with no human involvement
 
Politifact is not a valuable international entity and anyone who links it unironically thinking it's a valid source should commit Ronnie McNutt.
You incorrectly spelled 'no one' as "noone" and asserted that nobody disagreed the idea was plausible.
Also a "valid source" is any source that gets any single item correct, arguments to the source are irrational logical fallacies.
 
Politifact is not a valuable international entity and anyone who links it unironically thinking it's a valid source should commit Ronnie McNutt.

It was considered as such by the media, at least till it's inconvenient, like now.

Why you running interference for them newfag?
 
I didn't even know this wasn't the accepted way it happened until these stories started popping up.

1. Lab studying the bats who covid-19 came from.
2. Lab is in Wuhan where the outbreak started.

I don't really need a bunch of high end intel people to connect those dots.
 
On the next episode of "Duh".

Of course it is plausible. It is also plausible Russia or the United States released it. It is plausible it came from France too. I even heard it is plausible it naturally occurred.

Suspicions, gut feelings or "it's 99% positive" means...we don't fucking know. Await the evidence, shit bloody knows enough agencies are trying to get to the bottom of it. And amazingly, not one blogger on the internet will sway me until I see evidence.
 
The lab leak theory will float about, build momentum and traction, then at the last minute it will be:

Yes the corona virus leaked from a lab, but it came from a contaminated bat that was one of the carriers of covid. One of the bat's who tested false negative was released to the wild and somebody must have eaten it.

FWIW. SARS1 was originally a lab leak. It was on wiki, it's since been scrubbed and replaced with "it came from bats" (August 2017)
 
I didn't even know this wasn't the accepted way it happened until these stories started popping up.

1. Lab studying the bats who covid-19 came from.
2. Lab is in Wuhan where the outbreak started.

I don't really need a bunch of high end intel people to connect those dots.
Two labs in Wuhan, one lab(IIRC the one doing the research) was about 300 meters from the wet market that was claimed to be the source.
 
Maybe if The Stay-Puft Marshmallow President hadn't given at least three different excuses as to how it totally wasn't their fault, nosiree, I'd be more willing to believe this was natural.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo