U.S. Forces Ordered to Stop Using Gender Pronouns to Improve 'Lethality'

Thank God the Chinese and Russians are at least as fucked up as we are, otherwise we'd be up shit creek. "Leaders?" WHAT "leaders"? Leaders long gone, replaced by bosses. Glad to be long retired. Sure wouldn't want to be someone drafting things for the boss' signature. Happened a while back but just saw it today.


U.S. Forces Ordered to Stop Using Gender Pronouns to Improve 'Lethality'​

Pacific Air Force base bans references to gender, age, and race​

Adam Kredo
August 31, 2022
A division of the U.S. Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), the branch tasked with confronting China, has ordered its senior leaders and commanders to stop using gender pronouns in written formats, saying the shift to more neutral language will help improve the fighting force’s "lethality."

"In accordance with the Diverse PACAF priority, 'We must embrace, promote and unleash the potential of diversity and inclusion," states a May email sent to senior leaders and commanders at the Andersen Air Force Base in Guam, which operates under the Pacific Air Forces, according to a partial copy of the order obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Leaders at the base are instructed, "Do not use pronouns, age, race, etc." when writing performance reviews or other materials, such as recommendations for awards. "Competition against near-peer adversaries requires a united focus from the command, the joint team, and our international partners. Welcoming and employing varied perspectives from a foundation of mutual respect will improve our interoperability, efficiency, creativity, and lethality."

The policy change is part of a larger effort by the Biden administration and U.S. military to foster what it says is a more culturally sensitive environment. The U.S. Navy, for instance, recently published a video instructing its sailors on proper gender pronouns. The Army also mandates gender identity training and trains officers on when to offer subordinates gender-transition surgery, the Free Beacon first reported in March. Critics of these moves say a woke cultural agenda is handicapping America’s fighting forces and distracting it from pressing global challenges, such as terrorism and China’s aggressive war moves.

A spokesman for the Andersen Air Force Base confirmed the authenticity of the email, telling the Free Beacon that the Air Force is shifting "to a narrative writing format for awards and performance reports." The ban on "pronouns, age, race" and other written descriptors is "intended to eliminate any information that could identify the nominee's name, gender, age, or race so that all members had a fair and equal chance at winning."

The Andersen air base, the spokesman said, specifically "developed local quarterly award guidance to ensure each nominee was considered without the potential of unfair biases." Leaders at the base are "continually working to remove barriers and [are] dedicated to ensuring all members have the opportunity to excel."
The email goes on to list "authorized" and "unauthorized" examples of pronoun use.

The "unauthorized examples" include: "He/She did," "Best male/female," "Youngest/Oldest," and "Sergeant Murray." The list of "authorized examples" include: "This sergeant," "This NCO [Non-commissioned officer]," and "This member."

The policy shift jibes with the Pacific Air Forces’ overarching goal to promote "diversity and inclusion" at all levels of the service, according to the military spokesman.
"Unleashing the potential of diversity and inclusion at all levels is a Pacific Air Forces' priority and something we strive for at Andersen," the spokesman said. "Diversity and inclusion are force multipliers and warfighting imperatives that enable our competitive advantage against near-peer adversaries."

Rebeccah Heinrichs, a defense policy expert and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute think tank, told the Free Beacon that the Pacific Air Forces’ intense focus on pronoun issues is "a giant sucking waste of time."

Military leaders who should be focused on defending the United States from an ever-increasing array of threats—particularly in the Pacific, where China is flexing its military might—are instead spending valuable time thinking about rules on proper pronoun use.
"It is painful to think about the amount of time servicemen have already spent writing these rules instead of figuring out how to beat China," Henrichs said. "Somebody needs to remind DoD leadership that they’re in the business of preventing and winning wars and not in the Oberlin lounge."





 
This is a whitepill for me, NGL. When things finally get to their slow, shuddering collapse, there won't be enough soldiers for the kleptocrats who ruined this nation to push their authority.
Just in case no one has said it, this is actually the point of woke in the forces, to decimate them, then there is no one left who can actually fight the globalist military, who are legislated to enable them to come into a country, take over, and have absolute immunity no matter what they do.
 
xir.jpg
 
At this rate I'll be shocked if WW3 even happens and the superpowers of the world don't just all eat themselves.
Given the demographics situations in all the major powers, the level of technological dependence we've hit, and environmental issues , I think we're heading into a second Bronze Age collapse. Replace Sea People with Africans and other assorted shitskins
 
Just in case no one has said it, this is actually the point of woke in the forces, to decimate them, then there is no one left who can actually fight the globalist military, who are legislated to enable them to come into a country, take over, and have absolute immunity no matter what they do.
The world going full Deus Ex sounds cool, but I don't think it'll happen that way. Such an army would be an occupying army, and likely a small but well-armed segment of America would react as such. Ergo, by historical precedent, an optimistic estimate on the number of soldiers needed would be about 1% of the American population to enforce order.

This works out to over 3 million soldiers. Even if TPTB just focus on the big cities, the necessary soldiery will probably be too high for them to sustain. After all, where are they supposed to get the soldiers? Europe's as fucked as us, Russia and China seemingly aren't cooperating with TPTB, and soldiers from the third-world are so shit they're worthless.

If this were their strategy, then things are even better than expected because when things fall apart, TPTB won't have shit to keep things under control.
 
If you've noticed, the one thing the Biden regime has done that I approve of is supporting Ukraine in this war.
That's also the whole ass reason why your economic stability and citizens' well being in economic and social aspects are fucked beyond any merit now.

Please consider to follow after anime girl into a noose with your head. Thank you.


For all the posturing here, should shit really get serious here's what I believe will happen. All the people wasting time in these SJW-related positions will be given real jobs in their primary military specialties; those in the social actions field will be given real jobs. The SJW bullshit will be ignored while we're actually fighting. Sadly, the SJW people aren't competent enough to be sent in harm's way. The troons will be ignored, not that many anyway.
That's one hell of a way to tell you've become senile. I'll let it pass.


Note I'm talking about fighting a foreign enemy here
Foreign enemy? You utterly delusional nigger, wake the fuck up, it's not 70s-80s where USSR is still a thing.

The only foreign enemy of the States are UNITED STATES THEMSELVES. That's right Shirley, decades of warmongering and pushing up your "Simon sez" bullshit that led to inevitable upcoming big crisis everywhere in the world and what have it got you? You motherfuckers are to blame for what is happening right here and right now in Ukraine, it was YOUR kikes and faggots that were persuading and threatening the government prior to euromaudan, your elites have drove this bullshit to happen.

Honestly? Without your parasitic shithole the whole world would've been a better place, all things considered.

IF WW3 TO EVER OCCUR (and it will) THE ONLY ONES TO BLAME ARE YOU, NIGGER WORSHIPPING EBLANOIDS.
 
Última edición:
I hear you, but Russia considers us their "Main Enemy". Been that way for many years, with a break after the fall of the USSR.
As if our government hasn't fanned those flames since the fall of the USSR. We'll talk more about how Russia is the big bad while shaking hands with Xi who has ordered his military to steal state secrets from us and our allies with no discrimination for public and private sector.
Most of our government-prescribed enemies are defined by what is convenient for the domestic powers that be and not by enemy actions.
 
Carrier flight operations are one thing. When is the last time US navy surface combatants saw combat? Ramming container ships doesn't count. Dunking on Somalis with small boats and rusty AKs doesn't either.

No American submarine has sunk a ship in anger since World War 2. The only nuclear sub in the history of the world to sunk a ship in anger was HMS Conqueror, which sank WW2-vintage light cruiser General Belgrano in the Falklands War.

China will fight in their home turf supported by land-based aircraft, several carriers, an extensive unmanned ocean sensor network, a missile boat swarm and their entire submarine force. Their victory condition is US withdrawal and Taiwan's surrender, a victory that seems more winnable by the day.
Carrier task groups do more than just fly planes.


Doesn't matter when US Navy surface combatants/submarines last saw combat, question could be asked about many other navies, including China's. One big difference - the US Navy is active worldwide, and frequently working with allies and partners. Don't believe China has that kind of reach.

Chinese have an ocean sensor network. We had one on each coast decades ago. Would imagine we know how to deal with those sensors.


China has several carriers. Yup. One carrier is primarily a training ship. We have twenty total. Brits have a couple, Japan four, converting two to light aircraft carriers from helicopter carriers.


China has 78 submarines. We have 68. Japan has 21. Taiwan has 4. Not all those subs are out at any one time. And I wouldn't want to concentrate all my subs in the Taiwan Strait/South China Sea.



Also believe the Chinese will be more casualty-averse than the USA/Allies. Nearly every Chinese service member is a child of a one-child family. Since China has no national Social Security system, in the Chinese-Confucian model the son is expected to be the primary support of the parents in their old age. Lose carriers and troop transports, there go thousands of sons.

You've alluded to an extensive Chinese combined-arms capability. Yet far as I know those capabilities aren't fully developed, much less fully coordinated and exercised. Our combined-arms capabilities are rather more developed, coordinated and periodically exercised, both unilaterally and together with allies/partners.

Would also say such a conflict wouldn't be limited to just one area. China has some bases overseas, such as in Djibouti. Not all those bases will last long, can see Djibouti falling to a USMC amphibious force, supported by a carrier task group. No Chinese reinforcements likely to come by sea.


On the economic side, would look for all Chinese holdings in the USA to be nationalized, plus a total embargo against China. Other countries could join. China imports a great deal of food from the USA, depends on the US Navy to keep sea lanes clear for their imports.
Would also expect financial sanctions of various types.

To be honest, don't see such a war happening. Xi and China have far more pressing problems these days.
 
I hear you, but Russia considers us their "Main Enemy". Been that way for many years, with a break after the fall of the USSR.

Bah the whole world should consider the US it's main enemy. They're the ones exporting the globohomo woke shit.

They countries that survive will be the ones who have the strength to stop the woke shit in it's tracks before it infects their children and spreads. Once it gets into the cultural institutions it's all over and your country will be homo-fied and taken over.

Unless the US can do a 180 and put an end to it's cultural decomposition it is and should be considered a threat to any country's people.

I want to add that if the Chinks wanted to go to war with the US all they have to do is sell their US bonds and crash the US ecomony overnight. Remember China is the #1 purchaser of US bonds and T-bills.
 
LOL They must not want anyone signing up since the only people this kind of idiocy attracts have all ready drunk the koolaid and either fears (rape and racism propaganda) or hates the US military anyway!

In-fucking-sanity! Not just the choice but that fact that someone actually thought this excuse was a good idea... or true!!!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo