These two statements contradict each other. Any left-leaning president would never be capable of delivering justice unto treasonists because leftists are limpwrists.
a boomer's withered witch hands typed this post
Which type?
Ignore any connection to Trump and the Epstein files. What is stopping them from releasing them now?
To annoy you specifically.
Protecting pedophiles to own the libs?
I’m serious, why can’t we prosecute the pedophiles in those files? What’s stopping them, especially if Trump is in no way implicated? Why is he running defense for the most sadistic cabal of pedophiles in modern history?
I'd tell you to take the stick out of your ass, but I'm afraid you'd end up beating me with it.
I don't know. Part of me wonders if the Epstein Files got mega-hyped up by multiple people (including Trump) only for it to be a nothingburger relative to public expectation. I would have preferred a more interesting release than what we got, but I simply do not believe that Trump is implicated in the files. Either the Biden administration would have put that out front and center between 2020 and 2024, someone in the FBI/CIA who hates Trump (there are plenty) would have leaked it, or someone in Congress would have gotten their hands on this and leaked it.
That is the point of a stick. Now where the pointy end goes, is the question.
I'm left leaning and I can vouch that the majority of users in this thread (and on Kiwifarms in general) are not "left leaning". I'd also observe that a plurality, if not a majority, of users on Kiwifarms think still supporting Trump in July 2026 makes you a retard.
Trump's deteriorating rapidly. I do appreciate that your movement would probably act like the Chabad Lubavitch and still insist he's the best President ever even when he's non verbal, but when he does finally pop his clogs, you're not going to be able to run the country by insisting the Messiah is still alive and merely invisible/ruling in absentia.
But if it’s a nothing burger, why not release it and show it’s a nothing burger?
That's not what I meant. What I meant is that the Epstein Files, as interesting as they are, may not have been as provocative and damning as the public was led to believe. It is possible that the files were hyped up in public as being a treasure trove of dirty laundry of countless powerful figures and celebrities when, in reality, it's mostly the drug-addled ramblings of Jeffrey Epstein. Tons of people, including Trump, hyped it up. The Epstein Files have a mythical status in the public consciousness now. So, when they finally came out, it felt like something was held back or missing, which only fueled the conspiracy theories.
Hence why I've held that Trump himself probably isn't implicated, but a whole lot of people that Trump is buddies with and is holding to are.
I doubt this because so many of the supposed names in the files are people who are not friendly to Trump. Bill Gates, for example, is supposed to be in the files, but is highly critical of Trump. If Trump had blackmail on Gates, wouldn't Gates shut the fuck up? I'm not saying you're wrong, per se, but the idea doesn't pass my smell test.
I think it’s as likely there are plenty of people on both sides implicated who don’t want it out because it promises mutual destruction. Like if you and your mortal enemy robbed a bank together, you’re not going to go turn him in, because you’re going down too.
