Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.
- Iniciador del tema Mr Zero
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2024
Yes, the democrats aren't the radical left obviously. What I mean by the radical left is the group of people that I think can only be described as the radical left. Idk I think most people should know the types I'm talking about. In general if I ever say leftist, I mean leftist, not democrats. I would call them neoliberals or liberals maybe.
And if you read what I'm saying they are doing, it's not implying they have any kind of pull within the actual government through politicians. At least not like Democrats and republicans do.
That doesn't mean they aren't having an effect on the country. And it doesn't mean they shouldn't be taken seriously. Because they have caused things to change. Its just not what the actual people on the ground want.
My point is these people are influenced by propaganda (the ones that truly believe in this stuff) like everyone, then they act out based on that propaganda for a cause they believe is actually good. But if you look at what the actual results are, they aren't actually helping their cause. Instead it's lead to further radicalization from both sides. Hatred, division, which in turn kills any kind of organized progress on various issues.
Honestly what I'm trying to get across is complex enough that I think I won't be able to do it properly without sitting down and thinking about the best way to convey the idea. Instead of typing up a post on my phone like I am right now. Then I could give examples to explain what I mean exactly and why I'm saying what I am.
Edit: without actually laying out everything I'm trying to get at, I'll say this to hopefully at least point towards what I'm trying to say.
What we have in America, and our political system is a bunch of different factions all fighting for different things. We have democrats and Republicans which are both part of the establishment, and are nearly the same thing just dressed up a bit differently. And with them them we have the influences of the unelected officials that stay in power through all of it, the defense and intelligence people. Who do everything they can to influence the political system for whatever their goal is. They go hand in hand with the democrats and Republicans. We have have the news media which depending on the network either works directly with the establishment here, or other countries. Then we have the dissident right and left. Both of whom are being influenced by everything else that is happening, and being weaponized to help influence the actual people of the country. Then we have outside influences, Israel, Russia, China, various others that aren't directly tied with a nation state in the same way.
We have all of that and more, and then we have the political system itself, which is basically just a big game. Each side is playing to win, and playing off of each other. Taking advantage of everything they can to get what they want. And if people don't recognize that's what all of this is. They are going to he the ones that are being played by the people that are able to control the conversation, and who might not have the same political goals as you, but instead see you as a pawn that will help them get what they want.
That is the best I can do to explain the underlying idea of what I'm trying to get at off the top of my head. Without writing out a proper post going over everything.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 26 de Oct, 2019
Maybe naming some specific names would help - for example, Yanis Varoufakis or even some retard like Hasan Piker? Or do you mean special interest groups like Soros' Open Society Foundation, and Putin's Russia Today?
Maybe it's more than one of these people or groups, considering China's involvement and the Russian stuff, which imo was somewhat overblown/misused by the Dems. Getting bitched at by some retard because I voted for a woman that visited Putin (as if Trump trying to talk to Kim made him an agent for North Korea) was a real special kind of stupid. I don't know what was going through her head when she went to that event, but I doubt she's some hand-wringing piece of shit laughing about how we're all stupid Americans and love Trump. You (general You, not you specifically) wouldn't know that with the way establishment Dems talk about third party candidates, though.
I appreciate you taking the time to try and explain it. It's possible I agree, but I have a different way of wording things.
ETA: I think I get what you mean now. I wish there was something better people farther to the left than the status quo could do, tbh.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 13 de Ago, 2022
Could simply be the natural force of collective stupidity accentuated by professional rage-baiters who are just doing it for the clicks.
When will it begin?
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 2 de Ago, 2024
Podcasters, Youtubers, Tiktokers, Instagramers, any other -ers I may have left out. They really don't give a fuck all they want to do is paint the world as horrible and that only by listening to them you can do something. The fact those parasites haven't turned their back on Trump makes me believe he made a pact with the devil.
Jared knows how to be a foreign spouse to someone close to power. Michael is personally letting down Lebanon and it's lowkey his fault Israel is still there ruining his country.
- Registrado
- 4 de Jul, 2022
Thyroid cancer is the tricycle of cancers.
That's a funny way to spell "General Mills".
- Registrado
- 16 de Ene, 2019
Obligatory "Muh white ppl are da minority!"
- Registrado
- 4 de Jul, 2022
Her clothes are very bad. There is a vast swath of the population that uses one question ("does it cover my dick and/or tits?") to decide if they're dressed, and none of them are camgirls, so most KF users won't know what they [are] looking at when they see one.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 6 de Feb, 2021
I am sure this is just coincidence . /sneed
- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2024
For specific names. It's hard to do at least in that context. Like people will throw out things like "Tucker Carlson is a Qatar shill". but that in itself is propaganda to discredit him, from people who's interests he is fighting against. Or people saying Hasan is getting paid by the CCP or something, or is directly propagandizing for Hamas (as in they are having him do it, rather than he wants to of his own volition). Any names like those would just be speculation.
Something more in line with what I'm saying (but doesn't really cover the totality of it). Are cases like project mockingbird, and the many journalists that were confirmed to be just straight up writing propaganda for the CIA. Although I don't think by any means the CIA is the only thing doing this.
The main point I have is any time you're seeing a news story, or any kind of trending political topic. You should really look at what you're hearing about it and why. Who is the narrative coming from? Why is THIS specific story the one being pushed?
The fairly resent events with Trump, and Israel in Iran are actually a great example to use to show what I mean. The protests that happened in Iran before operation gay furry was launched by trump were being broadcast to us through every news stations, and all the big political streamers/pod-casters. And anyone aligned with Israel was making the story about how Iran is a totalitarian regime that is crushing descent and basically genociding the protesters. When the truth was actually at least somewhat closer to what the Iranian officials were saying. Mossad was actually trying to start an uprising to achieve regime change. The protests started over the financial situation in Iran caused by sanctions and other actions taken against the state. Then when they started Israel took advantage of the already set up network of dissidents within the country, and in all likelihood Iran very likely was killing mostly Israeli collaborators/mossad. But. that isn't the story that made it to us in the general public. The story we got, was basically a repeat of what they were telling up going into the Iraq war more or less. That Iran is slaughtering their own people who were doing nothing other than protesting, and we needed to send in our military to bring democracy
to Iran. It was a huge campaign built up specifically to manufacturing consent of the American public for us to send our tax dollars, and our young men over to Iran. The idiots that fell for it thought we needed to go help the poor Iranian people.a story for anyone who hasn't already seen it.
Or another example, but this time pointing out the dissident right doing it. This is something I've noticed becoming increasingly common I guess as a result of "the pendulum swinging" not that that actually means things are changing much in reality. Anyway. The far right will do the same thing (every political faction does this. This IS the game), they will latch onto a story that fits their political narrative particularly well. So the Iryna Zarutska story, or the Austin Metcalf story. When their is a story that fits the narrative they want to push perfectly they latch onto it, trying to convince people that liberal democracy has failed, or that all black people want whitey dead, or XYandZ thing. I started with the Israel/Trump example first because even though in some ways they are the most effective at it, they are also the most transparent and easy to spot. With the dissident right, it becomes less clear partially because there are different factions within the far right that have different goals. But generally speaking the themes it always centers around are something like America is a failed experiment, the west is failing, we need to replace it with some kind of totalitarian regime. As for who is behind it for the far right. It kind of goes back to what I said in the post above, but swap in the name curtis yarvin, instead of George Soros. The rest in that list still stand, because like I said, it's a lot murkier. The end result of what these people are doing ends up being nearly the same as the far left in some sense. At least from my point of view.
Then the far left. Since they were the ones I originally brought up. I think a good example to give is their reaction to the stories that were circulating around the time of the 2024 election. At the time, there was a heavy influence trying to paint Trump as the second coming of Hitler more or less. Kamala essentially said it in her own campaign, the media was saying it, and the giant influence network we have set up that promotes this stuff was saying it. (reddit being one of the biggest at the time). My theory for that narrative specifically, it was probably the Biden/Harris admin themselves, it's just logically the most likely. She was the sitting vice president, likely was able to get the intelligence agencies to use their various ways of influencing basically every media source, and spin the story she thought would help her win. The idea likely being to sell Trump as an actual fascist would make people think their life literally depended on voting for her. In this case it did work in one sense, but it completely backfired in another. I remember at the time, being in discord servers that had leftists in them. When Trump won no joke, they were all talking about arming themselves because they were completely convinced that Trump was going to start rounding up trannies to throw in camps or something. And I remember that whole Elon thing happening made it even worse. But i distinctly remember seeing these people already saying that, and when that Elon story dropped just cringing to myself thinking about what these people were going to do with that story. I say it backfired, because the end result basically spun things in Trumps favor. The most vocal people among the left are the most radicalizing thing for the people to the right of center.
those examples are all different in the intent, and in the methods, but the theme is the same. Almost anything political you see in the news is likely propaganda. We are all just useful idiots for someone. And at this point the right and the left are both doing the others work for them, and in they both accomplish nothing. The far left causes reactionaries on the right to gain political capital. and the reactionaries on the right, do the same for the leftists. Meanwhile we have things like influencible, the normal media who are also complete propagandists for one side or the other depending on the owner of the company.
I think one of the things that really sums up everything is what Netanyahu himself has said.
man. typing all this out. It's really made me realize how much bullshit really goes on in politics. With everything I've said, I feel like it's barely covering the tippy top of the iceberg for it. And I'm trying to cram in as much as I can to this without writing 10 page walls of text.
I should make it clear also, I'm not saying everything is manufactured and fake, I'm just saying people should watch out for the things that are. If anyone takes anything away from anything I've said here, let it be that you should always question why these people are saying something. I'm not saying you should think everything is a lie. Because a lot of the time it isn't an outright lie. They're half truths spun to further political goals. And you are doing yourself a disservice if you ever take anything anyone involved in politics is saying without considering that. Especially considering that even if you are consciously watching out for it, YOU STILL WILL FALL FOR IT. They wouldn't do this stuff if it didn't work. Just look at the miggers who talk about how much they hate brown people, yet they wanted to send our soldiers to fight in Iran to save the fucking Iranian citizens because ZOG-influenced media sources said we needed to. What you end up falling for just depends on your own inherent biases.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 16 de Ene, 2019
Its actually funny, since theres footage showing how these "innocent protestors" were shooting at cops and setting buildings on fire with civilians in them. Also, anyone notice how quickly how those Twatter accounts who were practically drooling over "Muh Murica liberaitin Iran" went silent.The story we got, was basically a repeat of what they were telling up going into the Iraq war more or less. That Iran is slaughtering their own people who were doing nothing other than protesting, and we needed to send in our militiary to bring democracy
Edit:
Just like with the Ukranian chick, heres your typical "OH NO! A WHITE PERSON WAS SHANKED GUYZ! MUH WHITE PPL!!"
Última edición:
⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛
Ulrich Wessel fiel, doch tausend neu erstehen!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Mar, 2019
More directly, the Iranians hit not just Kuwait, but a terrorist base in Kurdish-occupied Iraq that same day. Definitely one of those 'failed the beep test running for the bomb shelter' type training injuries.I am sure this is just coincidence . /sneed
MOST TRANSPARENT ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY
- Registrado
- 19 de Dic, 2020
That too but I was referring to the Moscow Signal. Allegedly, Soviets targeted the U.S. embassy in Moscow with microwaves. Officially, it was just a freaky signal with no apparent purpose, but apparently the embassy staff showed a higher incidence of cancer in longitudinal studies. Kissinger believed it caused some ambassador's leukemia.
Soviets and Iranians are petty enough to irradiate U.S. government staff just to give them cancer and dementia at retirement age. The U.S. population is already exposed to environmental carcinogens so a little cancer ray to make it happen faster is not entirely implausible.
- Registrado
- 4 de Oct, 2016
I love how some of these artists took a stand with Trump to say they would not back out, and he looked at the list and was like “these losers? Fuck it, I’ll do it myself”
- Registrado
- 3 de Feb, 2013
of course it's Titties Grummz spazzing out about thatJust like with the Ukranian chick, heres your typical "OH NO! A WHITE PERSON WAS SHANKED GUYZ! MUH WHITE PPL!!"
- Registrado
- 16 de Ene, 2019
Can I just say its ironic, that ones who are licking white boot are guys who arent even close to beinh..well..white
- Registrado
- 17 de Sep, 2024
Win the Fifa World Cup. Nothing brings a country together more than their national sports team pulling off a miracle.
Being a migger simp is one of those degrading jobs that has to be outsourced to third world jeets and gooks.
- Registrado
- 16 de Ene, 2019
Jeets, gooks and Puerto ricans, which..okay not shocking since Puerto Rico is pretty much Americas colony still.
- Registrado
- 4 de Jul, 2022
Global minority, not factually incorrect. (Though I personally don't oppose the enslavement of captured Angles. Those things are great).