Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Destacado
No refunds

IMG_2390.jpeg
 
Gregis dijo:
if anyone can access the Financial Times article
Presiona para expandir...
You can access it on your browser if you have the Bypass Paywalls plugin.
Firefox
Chrome
DevTwitter
I recommend that in general.

Alternatively you can look for snapshots on archive.ph by entering the article URL in their search. That brings up the article too.
link
Este contenido es privado.

It shows that this was part of the USAID hoax (everything under the sun was blamed on USAID to justify destroying it).
1739909675381.png
link
Yeah, it's lawfare, never mind that he bragged about committing the crimes on livestream and that no normal person thinks grooming minors into prostitution is okay.

1739909901498.png
link
Tate is a conservative according to this MAGA Christian, who is obviously not normal.
 
World in Scarlet dijo:
Yeah, it's lawfare, never mind that he bragged about committing the crimes on livestream and that no normal person thinks grooming minors into prostitution is okay.
Presiona para expandir...
Republicans think it's totally cool when it's one of their fellow conservatives doing it

Don't forget that they're trying to keep child marriage legal in the US
 
Hollywood Hulk Hogan dijo:
I bet they would be seething if Bill Gates or George Soros was doing what Elmo is doing
Presiona para expandir...
Nah, they applaud it. Soros is balls deep in the Trump admin through Scott Bessent as Secretary of the Treasury.

Edit: To be clear, Bessent's mandate from Trump to create a sovereign wealth fund for the US exists solely to support Soros Fund Management/Capital. Similarly, Australia's SWF invests in Soros Capital and US is the next country to plunder. Mary Manning serves the exact same function but more hidden in Australia's National Reconstruction Fund Corporation.
 
Última edición:
LifeAlert dijo:
Where can I read more about this?
Presiona para expandir...
For information about US' sovereign wealth fund:
Regarding my comment about plundering the US made here, I recommend to carefully think about the current dearth of wealth that the US could freely use for its future sovereign wealth fund and compare its situation with Norway. It is an interesting country as its sovereign wealth fund is built directly on its oil and gas revenues. The US does not have a sufficient amount of such revenues to replicate the success of the Government Pension Fund of Norway. What is does have, however, is an abundance of federal lands and properties which in the case of real estate, DOGE has supposedly already started selling off. Additionally, there are the Social Security Trust Funds (roughly $2.5 trillion) that thankfully hold only U.S. Treasury securities as mandated by law. Mind you, legislature is fickle and the introduction of a sovereign wealth fund could open new pathways of investing that money (for the good of citizens) into more diversified assets. For example, Norway's Government Pension Fund owns Apple stocks. Singapore's Investment Corporation is even bolder as it invests directly in private equity and alternative assets. Maybe one could even consider involving the Federal Reserve in supporting such a fund, but I am sure nobody would be foolish enough to actually do it. Overall, I am confident that under guidance of an SWF-alumnus such as Scott Bessent, a hypothetical US sovereign wealth fund will replicate the success of other countries and solely benefit the citizens of the US.

If you would like to learn more about Scott Bessent's outlook on investing, I recommend his interview in the book Inside the House of Money. I especially liked his response regarding his personal contribution to the Black Wednesday:
So you were running the Soros London office when the pound fell out of the ERM. Can you talk a bit about what happened on that famous trade?

We’d been thinking about it for a while. The trade is a good example of what made Soros a different sort of macro fund in that we did a lot of bottom-up research. Stan and George believed that if you can find out what’s going on at a micro level, you can figure out the big picture. My very minor contribution to the breaking of the pound was an analysis I had done on the UK housing and property market. In the United Kingdom at the time, about 90 percent of mortgages were linked to the overnight rate. If the Bank of England raised rates on Wednesday, mortgages went up on Friday. I had been short UK housing stocks for a while and George was chewing on me to cover the position because they were going up. I said, “George, I have done my work. These property stocks are going under.” George likes it when you argue with him if you’re right, which is why I think I did well there. Anyway, the housing stock trade was overshadowed by the pound trade, and rightly so. What is most interesting to me about the breaking of the pound was the combination of Stan Druckenmiller’s gamesmanship—Stan really understands risk/reward—and George’s ability to size trades. Make no mistake about it, shorting the pound was Stan Druckenmiller’s idea. Soros’s contribution was pushing him to take a gigantic position. With the pound, we realized that we could push the Bank of England up against the trading band where they had to buy an unlimited amount of pounds from us. The plan was to trade the fund’s profits and leverage up at the band’s boundary. The fund was up about 12 percent for the year at the time, so we levered the trade up to the point where if they pushed us back up against the other side of the trading band, we would lose the year’s P&L but not more. The UK economy was already weak, so when they raised interest rates to defend the currency, the average person’s mortgage went up. They basically squeezed everyone in the United Kingdom with a mortgage. When they raised rates from 7 percent to 12 percent with the stated goal of defending the pound, we knew it was unsustainable and that they were finished.
Presiona para expandir...
What's more, I love how he correctly identified the role of policy in cockblocking poor speculators like Soros from murdering economies:
There have been numerous instances where policy makers have blamed speculators for their country’s problems. What is your view on money managers forcing policy change versus policy mistakes attracting capital?

Occasionally, there can be short-term moves as a result of speculators, but I don’t think they can drive underlying fundamentals. On the other hand, when locals want to get out and you see capital flight, there is a fundamental problem—Russia being a classic example of locals getting out. So as long as the locals maintain faith, the speculators usually can’t break a system. The problem is, with the amount of capital out there today, a small currency block can get pushed around temporarily. In general, though, if you have the proper policies, speculators can’t do anything over the medium term. A good example of this was the Hungarian forint currency band recently when there was a big speculative push to actually strengthen the currency. The Hungarian central bank started printing forints and pushed it all the way back. It was a wide band so speculators got cleaned out.
Presiona para expandir...
I am glad that Trump chose such an experienced man to control US' monetary policies.

Edit: Forgot this tiny little excerpt from the end of the chapter regarding Bessent's assessment of the US' future.
This is the beginning of China’s decade. We’re beginning to see China flexing its muscles, and the United States is probably where the United Kingdom was around World War I in terms of world dominance.
Presiona para expandir...
 
Última edición:
Napoleon Bonerfart dijo:
not sure if TDS or TES


Ver archivo adjunto 6998008
Presiona para expandir...
Rogan's podcast went from having interesting guests who talked about their area of interest to just Trump and Republican and Elon propaganda. Them dropping 25% in a month is pretty shocking though given that's a huge amount

It went from some guy who wrote a book on Bigfoot talking about Bigfoot to some guy who just wants to have sex with Trump and can't stop talking about him

Rogan should probably get a lolcow thread. Guy is a lunatic
 
The Southwest Strangla dijo:
Kind of funny that TMT kicked down Rogan. The fact that people get this political/science views from a failed celebrity is depressing
Presiona para expandir...
I cannot express my hatred for these intellectual dark web types. They act like they're so smart and on the cutting edge of knowledge, but when you listen to them talk it's clear they're not very interesting thinkers and they have very little to say. The only people who take these schizos seriously are even bigger schizos and retards.
 
JaneThough dijo:
Why is Trump concerned about a non American?
Presiona para expandir...
That's what I thought, but apparently the Tates are British-American, and hold dual citizenship. American father. That's the only slight saving grace for anyone in a US admin taking an interest in the case, but Grenell at least seems to have a personal, partisan interest in it.
 
Gregis dijo:
Grenell at least seems to have a personal, partisan interest in it.
Presiona para expandir...
Because le based and redpilled empty platitudes that get continually replayed on conservative media, le super trad $1,000-a-month course on how to become a sex trafficker real man, and because he knows how to put those uppity bitches in their place which really turns on the nazi larper incels on /pol/. Oh and because anyone on the right who gets accused of sex crimes is clearly a victim of cancellation by the libs
 
LifeAlert dijo:
Because le based and redpilled empty platitudes that get continually replayed on conservative media, le super trad $1,000-a-month course on how to become a sex trafficker real man, and because he knows how to put those uppity bitches in their place which really turns on the nazi larper incels on /pol/. Oh and because anyone on the right who gets accused of sex crimes is clearly a victim of cancellation by the libs
Presiona para expandir...
Note also: Grenell is gay, as in, married to a man. Gay men can be insensitive to misogyny, to put it mildly.
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo