BR55
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Mayo, 2017
Because there is No difference between NeoCons and NeoLibs. They both believe in the same things, Corporatism and Interventionism, but they pretend they don't. When a NeoCon says something is "Unconstitutional" what they actually mean is " I want to implement this My/Our way instead".I have been noticing this behaviour from what is traditionally designated as the American right as well. I recently listened to Ben Shapiro's podcast, with whom I grow increasingly disappointed, where he commented on King George II's speech and the media's reaction to it. TL;DW: According to Ben Dubya didn't attack Trump directly but "the Left" and far right populists. From approximately 22:13 he addresses the speech with 30:49 being his final words on the issue.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=id=cQv7n2_o7Yc;m=30;s=49Personally I find Bush's speech irrelevant since this defect of a human being showed the entire world what he really stands for during his presidency; some of his fuckups already described by other Kiwis. It is my humble understanding that one of the pillars of American conservatism is the belief in a small government, which makes Ben praising Dubya as a "mensch" or "a good man" the more jarring given how during his presidency Burgerstan turned into the corporate equivalent of Eastern Germany with the government being way more up your ass than your proctologist.
Why neocons aren't considered social pariahs by now will remain a mystery to me.
inb4 the documents reveal that it was really Ted Cruz's father who killed JFK
As for Dubya's speech I think the whole thing is way overblown. The people who think it was some intentional and stirring takedown of Trump are SJWs desperate for an Anti-Drumpf talking point.
