ChefOptimusCunt
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 5 de Feb, 2024
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
- Iniciador del tema Randall Fragg
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 13 de Ene, 2024
How is it that can I tell the guy under the mask is brown despite the fact that I can't see his face and his voice is under a filter?
Edit: I just realized, it's the head bobs. The head of (modern) anonymous is Indian, it all makes sense. Although it is a repeating loop which makes me think they just clipped this from an old anonymous video, which is the laziness I would expect from an average leftist.
Also it's funny that I just got the option to change my custom title a few days before I made this comment.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 1 de Ago, 2023
Oh my goodness there reddit cat faggots in this thread too. I was just talking about you guys in the politics thread.
For real, what the fuck is it with the internet and cats? am i the only man here that doesn't give a fuck about cats? has anyone ever owned a cat? they fucking stink. their shit stinks. cat litter is the worst.
even you women have no excuse, they're fucking gross.
- Registrado
- 4 de Jul, 2022
I can't believe I thought these cringe faggots were cool back in 2008
- Registrado
- 22 de Mayo, 2016
Why the fuck are they talking about Trump as if he's gonna make America a communist hell? Are they actually retarded?
Because in 2008 they actually did hilarious shit. Not this reddit tier faggotry.
Too Sneed to care
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Sep, 2023
Watch out for the gay stingrays that killed Steve Irwin
- Registrado
- 22 de Ago, 2020
you can kill yourself now, you're never coming back from this
#lurker
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 4 de Mar, 2024
I will never understand people like yourself. Trump is trying to do right by his country, his citizens. And while that may come at a cost to your shithole country, isn't that something to celebrate? If you also had politicians that actually cared to change things up, maybe we'd all be better off.
The truth is, you're a sycophant of the status quo. Even as things get worse and worse, as your money buys you less, as your costs of living rise, you reject any genuine attempts to fix it. As if it will somehow magically get better on its own. How has that worked out for you over the last 30 years? Maybe another 30 years of doing nothing will fix things? Sorry, we don't have time to wait any longer.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 11 de Ago, 2019
2010 called, they want their cringe back
Anonymous decided to have their own woke reboot huh?
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2022
These retards are the exact opposite of what "Anonymous" was. They are establishment shills at best, most likely ideological ones instead and at worst literal establishment ghouls.
- Registrado
- 7 de Ene, 2025
To be fair, the loose collective that we called anon back then was made of far sterner stuff than these queers larping as hackers are. They'd do something righteous like fuck with Scientology and then crash your Habbo server for laughs (fuck yeah swastiget). They were chaotic, and they sure as hell wouldn't stooge for the progressive establishment. This is an embarassing sham.
Maneo Tempestas
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Nov, 2023
You're confusing the historical hacker culture sense of “Anonymous” where anyone could use the name (including state actors or those doing it for the lulz) with “Anonymous” in the symbolical sense. The value I speak of does not come from being a unified, non-honeypotted non-state group of sorts (which Anonymous never was) but from promoting the idea of leaving identity politics aside & favoring collective anonymous action against wealthy elites who lobby to profit from negative externalities. If it eventually causes enough real people to believe that they could easily participate in something greater as to cause more anonymous protests (discoupled from computing origin), it doesn't matter how genuine the simulacra was. The only problem would be if this was a campaign to, say, cut out as many people even vaguely interested in themes of freedom, anonymity, or activism as possible from the topics, which could be done by targeted nudging campaigns. But wouldn't theatretical TikTok be a rather counterproductive way for reducing interest?
- Registrado
- 11 de Ago, 2019
So what you are saying is that, like usual, the left cant do anything original so they gotta take what their opposition did and slap their own logo ontop of it (original, dont steal,
)
- Registrado
- 7 de Ene, 2025
And most importantly, do it far more incompetently.So what you are saying is that, like usual, the left cant do anything original so they gotta take what their opposition did and slap their own logo ontop of it (original, dont steal,
- Registrado
- 16 de Ene, 2020
- Registrado
- 7 de Dic, 2015
>dismantle the lowerclass and force them into poverty so that they submit to the economic servitude of the rich
I always laugh at the narrative of "Making poor people work for rich people" being the supposed worst, most dystopian outcome dorks like this can think of, because it's still infinitely more charitable and kind and merciful than actual, objective reality, which is that we could round up the bottom 10-20% of poors -- the ones that not only don't have substantial wealth, but actually have NEGATIVE wealth (owing more than they own), corral them into about a 5 sq. mile area (I vote Central Park because the collateral damage would include the Village, Williamsburg, Chelsea, SoHo and other focal points of concentrated Millennial/Zoomer trust fund alphabet people leftoid retardation), have them stand in rows and shoulder to shoulder and then drop a nuke in the middle of them and turn them and just about everything in a 10 mile radius to irradiated dust and, of the remaining 280 million people in America, the only people for whom life would substantially change in any way for would be that the people who sell "Eat the Rich", "Black Lives Matter", "We Believe in Science", "Be Gay, Do Crimes", "There is no Planet B", etc. stickers on Etsy and Redbubble would instantly lose their entire customer base.
- Registrado
- 5 de Nov, 2020
It's a horsey comic he is the prime example of liberal propaganda. Every cartoon is about how the right wing are evil or inhumane I think there was a comparison to stonetoss at one time how stonetoss is more effective at changing minds via his comics where horsey reenforces a progressive narrative considering he lives in Seattle it's no surprise.
ObeseGeese
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Ago, 2024
The current glut of Feds is a bunch of worthless "people" in equally worthless positions. Why do you think Elon's rocketry was able to teabag the hell out of NASA's best efforts? Like the saying goes "You'll know things are getting serious when all the actors in US Army ads are white males"
ChefOptimusCunt
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 5 de Feb, 2024
No, it's a pretty apt way of creating a meandering interest and quelling potential threat simultaneously. Satiate people who want to "fight the system" by creating an avenue for them to support an ideology which is spread by the most basic consuming possible, social media. The only accomplishment this will generate is making some people who feel disenfranchised, or oppressed (legitimately or not, doesn't matter), an outlet to feel like something is happening. I'd compare it to the alphabet agencies using the term conspiracy theory as a title given to things that are deemed a problem to the narrative, regardless of context or evidence. The only thing this accomplished is the lack of accomplishment and delegitimizing actual threats, and I'd wager that's the intention. Imagine seeing a verified "anonymous" profile and taking a single word as genuine and not acknowledging the realistic possibility of some kind of subterfuge. How exactly does this result in a situation in which poor people would do something against billionaires?
- Registrado
- 5 de Nov, 2020
Obama really went after hackers hard his administration did everything they could to go after hackers, whistleblowers, and anyone who could hold them to account.
I mean one of the worst things his administration did was set up a massive I mean massive censorship apparatus and expand left wing ngo control of things.