Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Destacado
You've been mad before but have you ever been Mike Pence staring down at the DMZ mad?
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • FB_IMG_1494421009934.jpg
    FB_IMG_1494421009934.jpg
    49.2 KB · Vistas: 297
AnOminous dijo:
Wait, people are mad about firing Comey? Wasn't it just like a few days ago they were screaming for his head because he literally rigged the election for Trump?
Presiona para expandir...
Well now that he's been fired by Trump, they now think Comey is on their side now. Sort of a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" mentality, not realizing how stupid and hypocritical it is regarding Comey.
 
Baldur's Gait dijo:
Well now that he's been fired by Trump, they now think Comey is on their side now. Sort of a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" mentality, not realizing how stupid and hypocritical it is regarding Comey.
Presiona para expandir...

He would literally have been fired on Day One of a Hillary admin.
 
ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton

Omar Jadwat, arguing before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, admitted that President Trump’s order could be constitutional if Hillary Clinton had enacted the same order.


ACLU Lawyer Omar Jadwat, arguing against President Trump’s travel ban before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, admitted that the same exact travel ban “could be” constitutional if it were enacted by Hillary Clinton.

Jadwat argued that Trump’s campaign animus motivated the order, making it illegitimate. This claim was challenged by the Fourth Circuit’s Judge Paul Niemeyer.

“If a different candidate had won the election and then issued this order, I gather you wouldn’t have any problem with that?” Niemeyer asked.

Jadwat dodged on directly answering the question at first, but Niemeyer persisted, asking the question again.

Jadwat again tried to avoid the question, asking for clarification on the hypothetical, but Niemeyer once again demanded an answer.

“We have a candidate who won the presidency, some candidate other than President Trump won the presidency and then chose to issue this particular order, with whatever counsel he took,” Niemeyer said. “Do I understand that just in that circumstance, the executive order should be honored?”

“Yes, your honor, I think in that case, it could be constitutional,” Jadwat admitted.

Jadwat also denied that presidents’ actions should be nullified by campaign statements, despite the fact that his entire argument seemed to rest on that claim.

The ACLU lawyer also tried to claim that the order was illegitimate due to its being “unprecedented,” but this point also crumbled under a quick cross-examination.
Presiona para expandir...
 
heathercho dijo:
Ver archivo adjunto 217546

:story: :heart-full: lol calm down, Keith.
Presiona para expandir...
I read the contents of the tweet before I read the handle... Someone who fancies himself a political commentator is doing Dobson level Twitter screeds.
Johnny Bravo dijo:
i7j.png


This is some top tier trolling by our own mother fucking president.
Presiona para expandir...
When you're so fucked the news knows about your termination before you do.

Get rekt Comey.
Elwood P. Dowd dijo:
ACLU Lawyer Says Travel Ban ‘Could Be Constitutional’ if Enacted by Hillary Clinton
Presiona para expandir...
Something something, "partisan bias," something something, "It's okay when we do it-- REEEEEEEEEE..."
 
The entire response to Trump firing Comey has been:
How dare President Trump fire the person we publicly demanded he fire! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE This is Exactly like Watergate!

The cognitive dissonance surrounding the Comey firing is nothing short of astounding, Colbert had to remind his audience that they hate Trump when they started cheering at the news.


 
Última edición:
Literally Hitler dijo:
The entire response to Trump firing Comey has been:
How dare President Trump fire the person we publicly demanded he fire! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE This is Exactly like Watergate!

The cognitive dissonance surrounding the Comey firing is nothing short of astounding, Colbert had to remind his audience that they hate Trump when they started cheering at the news.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RCVBEE1SfXI
Presiona para expandir...
It's so funny to me that Trump actually did something they were clamoring for, but because it's Oompa-Loompa Hitler that fired Comey suddenly it's a really bad thing.

It's like they deliberately want to avoid giving Trump any credit because that would imply he's actually not as horrible as everyone keeps screeching he is, even though in this case he literally gave them what they wanted. If anything it makes them look worse.

"REEEE Comey needs to be fired! He cost Clinton the election REEEEE!!!"

"You're fired."

"REEEEE He fired Comey! He's trying to hide his Russian connections REEEEE!!!"
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo