Again, I still am completely befuddled as to why in the holy heck everyone on Twitter thinks of Obama as being some sort of perfect almighty loving deity. Heck, not just Twitter. Just look up all the fricken children's books and the like all portraying him as being this compassionate and loving ruler.
twitter.com
twitter.com
We'd still be cucking to Russia. Increase funding to WHO while not restocking our own medical supplies, let china beat us without putting up a fight and thanking them instead, devolve our military because those poor isis poc need to defend themselves with weapons not our evil colonial racist troops. Help other countries first while we get crippled beyond belief. Trade troops for praise (for himself) by iranian officials and tell us not to be racist calling it a foreign virus.
We wouldn't even be talking about the virus. Obama would be letting it in to kill people (but only in red states, blue states would get testing kits and vaccines early) and the media would be covering it up.
Any sources for this?
On short notice, here's a transcript of a presser from the CDC where they talk about testing briefly, saying preliminary testing is only happening in NY and CA.
aren't "progressives" the left vote? I can't keep track of this bullshit
Ever since Bernie cucked out (again) the Ouroboros has feasted, as Dems have desperately started flailing around for excuses as to why the party of blacks, women, and other minorities has an old white man (who is accused of being rapist too, for extra negative woke points) as presidential nominee. So the "liberals" are yelling at the "pregressives" and the "progressives" are yelling back, all while the Bernie hardliners are radicalizing. Not that it matters that the Bernie fans radicalize, since they seem incapable of actually doing anything off the internet, but it does serve to muddy the waters further if all you pay attention to is Twitter.
us
Fuentes had the best and most succinct take on this: When they want to get something done, they find a white man.
"Centerists" (sic)
The biggest reason they do this is because they lack any principle besides sheer power lust.
It's going to be Stacie Abrams. Kamala has too much baggage to be a good VP. Not that Stacie doesn't with that whole chimpout over losing an election in GA, but she's cleaner than any other former Dem candidate.
More specifically it's Calvinism. Progressives are The Elect, and everyone else are Reprobates.
Funnily enough, the programs he promoted are banned in California because they're too effective.
Because he opposes policies supported by the (((Chosen))) of New York and California, and despite those (((Chosen))) being mostly atheist or secular they are the real (((Chosen))); while Israel is a white neo-colonialist western establishment on land stolen from Austere Scholarly Dindus of Peace.
The only reason she came remotely close to "winning" that election was because Kemp was such an unlikable, low-energy Good 'Ole Boy shell who just expected to casually ride to victory by being a GOP-GOB in Georgia.
