Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Mrs Paul]

TIL every person in america is descended from rich slaveowners AND the people who killed the native americans. Also, there never ever has been legal immigration into america.

I once had some buttmunch tell me that every single white person in America is descended from slaveowners. I pointed out that all of my ancestors came here after the Civil War. Nope, he refused to budge, and just kept ranting on and on.
It's not like I was saying they were good people or anything -- hell, for all I know I could have a serial killer somewhere in my background. I'm sure plenty of them were racist pricks. But, you can't tell me some dirt poor peasant living in bumfuck Slovakia who can't read, write, or speak English owns slaves half-way across the globe.

It's kinda funny that sjws are using a tactic that western colonialists and racists in the USA used to deflect legitimate criticisms.

"You're invading Hungary"

"Well you're invading Vietnam and taking over countries with Banana companies"

"Lol, whataboutism, silly ruskies"


You don't really get anywhere constructive with it.

"And you are lynching Negroes."

 

[Wallace]

It's not about principle. It's about pathological altruism and virtue-signaling to impress people. It's the most self-centered example of "selflessness" I've ever seen in my fucking life and it's rampant.

Of course, the people who profess this the loudest never practice what they preach. Shortly after Trump won the election, one of the executives at Google said he "wasn't going to use his white privilege anymore". Then he went home and slept in his huge home in one of the most expensive cities in the world. Performative wokeness turns my stomach. It's like seeing the televangelists buying themselves private jets.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Eventually another shitbag democrat who panders to the smuggest and most obnoxious crybullies in society is going to be back in the white house.

Are you so sure about that?

Literally the only reason that pseudo-progressive intersectionalist assclowns and authoritarian social constructivist Marxist not-quite-demagogues have not been routed out of the Democratic Party is because the party membership at the top have been infected with the same societal-intellectual cancer, at least insofar as they can use it to gain socio-political power.

They see Twitter and Tumblr as the way America should go, as Twitter and Tumblr users are overly emotional, wholly irrational, and thus easily led. They see the much-fabled "browning of America" as good because they see all "brown people" (in this context blacks and Hispanics/Latinos) as of the same mind and of the same desires: free stuff without work. Thus all "brown people" will and should vote Democrat as the Democrats will give them free stuff, no effort required.

They talk about "our democracy" to not only psychologically prime, but to control the language of discourse. If you can control language, you can control how people think. So they use positively connotated terms such as "our democracy" to lure people into their side, without actually thinking of what they actually mean when they say this. Protip: a naked, pure, direct democracy is unfeasible with a country the size of the USA, and even if it weren't, demagogues would use it to gain power and eventually make the country an oligarchy, which is what the Democrat leadership really wants.

But now people are waking up, now more than ever before. "Brown people" are waking up. The West is waking up. The ideologies of Intersectionality and Marxism will soon go the way of Nazism, fascism, and religious fundamentalism; the conceptual trash can of discredited and discarded ideas.

This is coupled with the fact that, whether it be via excessive nepotism and cronyism, or something else entirely, the Deep State and international "Shadow Government" have degenerated into near-complete ineptitude, at the very least on the end of the "foot soldiers". We all saw the OIG Report on the FBI's Investigation of the Clinton Email Scandal, and it displayed stunning incompetence on the side of the FBI.

The Democrats simply cannot win any major elections if they keep embracing "social justice" and bowing to the whims of a social bloc that is rapidly shrinking, yet increasingly loud to compensate. So, simply out of self-preservation, they'll shift course out of these unprofitable beliefs.

Mark my words: by 2024, there will be a mass purging of all these unsavory elements from the Democratic Party, as its highest members realize that they're, to put it simply, bad for business.

Until then, I shall wait to see if Trump does anything to seriously cut the power of the Federal Reserve Banking System and to criminalize fractional reserve banking, which will near-completely eliminate US debt. I will wait to see if he works to move the power to print money back into Congress.

And if he does, then Semper Fidelis, and Jehovah bless.

pathological altruism

This isn't "altruism". If it was, these people would be concerned for their fellow Americans. This is self-righteous malignant narcissism, nothing more.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

The idea is, I think, white people deserve to die off because they took everything they had from better, more native, and more colorful people. Other nations with different colored people formed long after the USA aren't subject to this, of course, all those invasions and killings were part of their beautiful cultures.

This is dumb. We know about the dumbfucks idiotic enough to record that they murdered a shitload of people. Most nations throughout history didn't have the ability to make any kind of record, and once they did, most of them didn't want to document the stuff that showed they were horrible murderers.

So now, we've decided that actually everyone totally truthfully recorded their own history, it was just the whites that were bad, nevermind all the historical evidence to the contrary. When the "native americans" that the US settlers genocided showed up america wasn't just empty. It had different people. Who they killed, enslaved, integrated, whatever. But, they didn't write much history, so nope they just poofed into existence as part of the beautiful nature that was here until whitey torched it all for fun.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

The idea is, I think, white people deserve to die off because they took everything they had from better, more native, and more colorful people. Other nations with different colored people formed long after the USA aren't subject to this, of course, all those invasions and killings were part of their beautiful cultures.

This is dumb. We know about the dumbfucks idiotic enough to record that they murdered a shitload of people. Most nations throughout history didn't have the ability to make any kind of record, and once they did, most of them didn't want to document the stuff that showed they were horrible murderers.

So now, we've decided that actually everyone totally truthfully recorded their own history, it was just the whites that were bad, nevermind all the historical evidence to the contrary. When the "native americans" that the US settlers genocided showed up america wasn't just empty. It had different people. Who they killed, enslaved, integrated, whatever. But, they didn't write much history, so nope they just poofed into existence as part of the beautiful nature that was here until whitey torched it all for fun.

One thing I think about is the moral status of war, especially in ancient times. It was only rather recently until "war crimes" became a thing. Before, literally anything was justified as long as one's own side of war was doing it. There were even war deities, although I don't know what they were supposed to do. War seems to be the one activity in which morality is completely suspended.

I bring this up because the Native American tribes were not peaceful at all. They killed each other, enslaved each other, all of that. And yet questions into the morality of their past are "suspended" by the left to get Twitter good boy points.

 

[Kari Kamiya]

The closer we get to the rain of salt that will be the midterms, and the more people shit on Trump for "robbing" the seat of the most important job in the nation and "destroying this country", the more I keep thinking back to this famous photograph of JFK, "The Loneliest Job in the World".

Yeah, the backstory behind this photograph's not symbolic (his bad back made him read newspapers like this), but if you didn't know about that, the look itself tells you everything. This is the reality of what it means to be the president of the most free nation on Earth while the rest of the world is in strife. It's not a job meant to be taken up by just about anyone because it's a stressful job, full of hardship, obstacles, and hard choices. One little mistake could cost the president not just their reputation or their job as leader, but most importantly, it could cost the lives of innocents. And that's a huge burden, a huge responsibility. And it seems like so many people just don't realize this, due to pure ignorance or because they're blinded with power, or in this case, rage that "their candidate" didn't win.

This is what it means to be a leader. It's not about being popular, or being a figurehead to put on the dollar or to plaster your face everywhere. It's about protection, about sorrow and grief, about looking to the future. It's about bettering not just yourself, but bettering everyone who looks up to you whether for protection or for guidance. And while you may have people working for you, ultimately, with all eyes on you, you have the final say as a representative of an entire nation.

I don't know what's it's like to be Donald J. Trump. I don't know what it's like to be a part of his family, his co-workers, his circle of friends. I don't know what goes through his head every morning he wakes up to go to work and walk into the Oval Office, or when he's going out to his rallies to speak to the people, or when he's crossing the oceans to meet with the leaders of foreign countries. I don't know if he's enjoying every little minute, or if he's had to isolate himself for a bit to take a breather.

All I know is he's President Trump. He's not just the president, or my president, he's the President of the United States of America. He's the leader of the most free nation in the world, taking on the world's biggest responsibility for himself. And people automatically either respect him or despise him for it just because of what he stands for.

People are so quick to forget that it was like this for all of our presidents. You could say President Washington had it worse off for being the first, but outside of the current political climate, there's no difference. Some had it harder than others, some just weren't president long enough to leave behind any lasting impact. But by default they all had one thing in common:

America chose them. America's trust and livelihood was put on their shoulders, for better or for worse.

Truly, it is the loneliest, most difficult, most respectful job in the world.

 

[Ghostse]

Srs Post:
I'm going to try to keep this short, apologies it its a little scattered due to edits:
Please read to the end.

There are "White People" and there are "European Americans"/"Caucasian"/whatever. There is (or at least was) a distinction. The Irish used to be pale niggers, and so did the italians, but at some point they became "white" - that is, they were integrated into the 'ruling class'. So when you had the first calls to "eliminate whiteness", it was not about demographic change or making women get blacked or w/e, it was about removing this self-defined 'ruling class' and breaking this minorty's hold over a majority they used to keep power:
Vote for me even if I act against your interests, because maybe one day you could also be in the ruling class, since you are also white.

Please note I said "the first calls", the destruction of 'whiteness' is fine in a limited academic sense as way of eliminating the undeserved power concentration at the top of the food chain among connected families. You eliminate "whiteness", not people of Europeon ancestry. Now LOL if you think the average TDS-sped who's joined the screaming hate mob on twitter or MSNBC understands this fine difference.

You're seeing the attempt to create a "new white" with democrats and their "POC"; they are trying to unite their base as "people of color" regardless of actual ethnicity and then letting allies with 1/1024th hertitage also claim the label. Just like the expansion of "white" ('My family has been in germany since 500AD, all of my ancestors from then till 1910 were from the same 30-mile radius in Bavaria, and then mom married a FOTB from scotland. But Grandma converted to judism, so I'm jewish and not white.')

Also remember, the people at the top don't care what the skin color of their subjects is. Their kids aren't going to schools overrun with TB-infected tards, their school's limited budget isn't being wasted on interpreters. Their neighborhoods have private armed guards and aren't being turned into proxy wars for cartels. You make people dependent on the governemnt, and they can never vote you out.

tl;dr Deport all the fucking Micks & Wops.

You know, I hate to sound like a jerk and say that I agree with this, but I recently took a break from dating and had a conversation with a lady friend of mine that went down this road and got pretty heated.

She felt like I was harming myself and "being unfair to women" and I just couldn't get where she was coming from.

"Don't you want help with cooking, cleaning, and all the other chores?" "I take care of all of that just fine by myself" "Don't you want to be able to move into a house?" "I just got approved for a loan, I don't need a woman to buy a house". "What about emotional support?" "I have plenty of friends and family for that" "Don't you want children?" "If I am no good at maintaining a relationship, how good of a parent do you think I'd make?"

"Well how about sex?" "Okay you got me there"

Literally, the only pro she could give me to get into a relationship again that made any kind of sense was sex (and technically, I don't even need to be in a relationship for that)....oh boy.

Spoiler: Offtopic

dbl srs post here, I don't want to turn this into Gender War/Biotruths/Mogo/incel whatever chat but:
First, counter point: Someone who has no redeeming personal characteristics than physical attractiveness is awful no matter if they a man or woman (or I suppose more to the point, never developed a personality other than "entitled"). This seems to be much more common in women then men, but possibly that's personal perspective as I'm not approaching random guys.
But anyone with no personality, no hobbies other than getting trashed and going to the club, or going shopping (or: consumptive instead of productive hobbies. Also see: Weebs), just aren't that much fun to be around for a while.

Second, I don't want to say you're wrong, but there is a difference between the emotional support of a partner and your family/friends, you need find & date a better caliber of woman. But I'll admit they seem to be getting rarer, but that could also be personal perspective since I'm in an area that would have a greater than normal concentration of women who are little better than vaginal life support systems no matter what the external social climate was like.

Also: Lol, @ your ladyfriend. "Help with cooking and chores". lol.

 

[Vorhtbame]

Just this one thing right here:

Second, I don't want to say you're wrong, but there is a difference between the emotional support of a partner and your family/friends, you need find & date a better caliber of woman. But I'll admit they seem to be getting rarer

For that, you can thank the strain of feminism that teaches us that "men are dangerous, men are unreliable, men only want one thing, so look out for yourself and your girl posse and don't trust them men." And don't forget "everyone is judging you, all the time, isn't it terribly unfair, it's only a matter of time before someone shits on you for something you can't help." Self-confidence is the absolutely last thing that feminists have been encouraging in women, contrary to their insistence, but it's so critical to forming any sort of meaningful and lasting relationship...

 

[0 0]

Yeah, how dare they be led to believe the context of the question is "sexually" because someone brought up taking vaginal off the table. There's really no right answer to that one, because if a woman says anything that isn't sexual, the automatic gotcha is either "so your boyfriend is gay" or "so you don't think sex is important to your relationship".

I agree that there's a problem these days, but you can't pull a trick question and then mock people as if you didn't ask them a trick question.

Hey, I'm not saying he's infallibly right or that it's a philosophy to live by. I'm just saying it reminded me of a joke a comedian told. I like the joke, but I don't personally agree with it. I always believed the most miserable relations are the ones based solely on the sexual aspects of it. I don't validate myself through a loaded question told as a joke by a comedian.

 

[Kinkshamer]

This Tumblr account (archive) seems dedicated to posting nothing but "resist Blumpf" shit, blue wave/Occupy Democrats stuff, and thinks doing stuff like posting Louis Farrakhan tweets is a good way to get people to vote blue.

http://phroyd.tumblr.com/post/179702137092/express-your-disappointment-through-your-vote

http://archive.is/7CJP3

His description:

Absurdity, Art, Beauty, Contradiction, Humor, Irony, Paradox, Politics and Surrealism ..... The Thoughts and Musings of a Psychotherapist Trying to Navigate A World That Has Become Psychologically Unglued!

Seems a lot like projection.

 

[damian]

Don't know if posted already but:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...rats-third-party-stay-home-column/1669812002/

EDIT:

• Not all Donald Trump voters are MAGA zealots. If you have reservations, vote Democratic, vote third party, or stay home in the 2018 midterm elections.

At a time when politics is conducted as burlesque, it is easy to think that the audience is as wretched as the performers. Not so.

This is especially true of voters who backed Donald Trump in 2016. The Trumpeteers who cheer at #MAGA rallies are only a small cadre of his electorate. The Republican scaredy-cats and weasels in Congress dance to Trump’s looniest tunes with more enthusiasm than their constituents. Polls consistently show that many,if not most, people who say theyapprove of President Trump do so with deep reservations.

Many Trumpers are actually Semi-Trumpers. Not all, but probably most.

So, I’d like to urge all those Semi-Trumpers out there, the Semi-Silent Majority of Trump voters, to do some serious thinking before the election. Please. Pretty please.

What message do you want your vote to send?
Given your reservations about President Trump, what is the most prudent and careful way to use your vote — and your influence?

Do you want Donald Trump to be more checked and more balanced in the next two years, or less?

Do you want your vote to embolden or temper Trump before the next session of Congress?

In asking you to think seriously about these questions, I’m not suggesting you read more columns about what a dishonest rat Trump is or how his latest Tweet, twerk or tall tale proves, once and for all, that he is, indeed, a dishonest rat. I’m not suggesting you study his record and rhetoric with a newly opened mind. In fact, turning off your screens and taking a walk will do more to clarify your thinking and find your gut-level convictions.

More: I didn't become a Republican to 'own the libs' with Kavanaugh. So I'm leaving the GOP.

The Rust Belt is done with Donald Trump's gold-plated populism

Republican Congress won't rein in Donald Trump

My assumption is that 95 percent of the world has a firmly fixed view of Donald Trump at this point. There has been ample time and opportunity to observe and to argue. There’s not a lot of point continuing to debate: Donald Trump — good or evil?

Trump voters are conflicted
Most of Trump’s supporters, though they prefer him to the alternatives and like things about him, have conflicting views as well. The most common and serious concerns are about his temperament, veracity, manners and character, according to poll after poll.

This is amply demonstrated by how Trump has broken a long electoral pattern. Despite a very strong economy, Trump has a lower approval rating at this point in his term than any president since Harry Truman.

Historically, that is strange. Economic good news equals political good news for incumbents. The reason behind the Trump anomaly is simple: The vast majority of voters, including Trump voters, have profound reservations about the tone of Trump’s presidency and the way the country “feels” today.

So, what’s a concerned (even closet) Semi-Trumper to do on Nov. 6?

I’d suggest they do exactly what American voters have done for most of the past 50 years: Divide power between the parties. Do not let the Republican Party control the White House, the House, the Senate and, now, the Supreme Court. Take your own concerns about Trump and his party seriously.

This means voting for the Democrat in your House and Senate elections. Even if you have to hold your nose, do it. And try to persuade those who think like you to do the same.

If that is asking too much, vote for a third-party candidate, or write in the name of someone you admire.

And even though it’s a violation of the unwritten rules of editorializing, I’d say it’s better to stay home on Election Day than veto your reservations about Donald Trump and his presidency.

Resist, Semi-Trumpers, at least a little.

Dick Meyer is the author of “Why We Hate Us: American Discontent in the New Millennium.” Follow him on Twitter: @DickMeyer_DC

You can read diverse opinions from our Board of Contributors and other writers on the Opinion front page, on Twitter @usatodayopinion and in our daily Opinion newsletter. To respond to a column, submit a comment to letters@usatoday.com.

 

[Rathkor]

Don't know if posted already but:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...rats-third-party-stay-home-column/1669812002/
Ver archivo adjunto 583006

EDIT:

So I see the democrats have reached the Bargaining Stage of grief.

 

[AprilRains]

Translation: "If you have any doubts about Donald Trump, take my advice, as someone about when you know nothing. Disregard your wishes and act upon mine. I will offer no other reasons for this, depending upon your regard for me rather than upon reasons or facts. Given the solemnity of the occasion, please withhold your applause."

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

That's actually probably one of the more potentially lucrative methods they've come up with, there are a fair number of "conservatives" who are desperate to not be seen as one of THOSE conservatives (with that meaning anything more than a millimeter to the right of center, in some cases). Zealous moderates, if you will. A lot of them were already Never Trumpers but probably just stayed home or voted third party, urging them to vote Democrat is both theoretically possible and already not much of a stretch for them, especially if you toss on the lure of it as being a way to prove once and for all that they're not one of THOSE conservatives.

 

[AprilRains]

That's actually probably one of the more potentially lucrative methods they've come up with, there are a fair number of "conservatives" who are desperate to not be seen as one of THOSE conservatives (with that meaning anything more than a millimeter to the right of center, in some cases). Zealous moderates, if you will. A lot of them were already Never Trumpers but probably just stayed home or voted third party, urging them to vote Democrat is both theoretically possible and already not much of a stretch for them, especially if you toss on the lure of it as being a way to prove once and for all that they're not one of THOSE conservatives.

Well, that and it costs very little to ask. It's possible the author was even paid. Can you imagine that?

 

[XYZpdq]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=gEKcDO33cfQ

Andrew WK?

 

[U 'MIRIN BRAH?]

That's actually probably one of the more potentially lucrative methods they've come up with, there are a fair number of "conservatives" who are desperate to not be seen as one of THOSE conservatives (with that meaning anything more than a millimeter to the right of center, in some cases). Zealous moderates, if you will. A lot of them were already Never Trumpers but probably just stayed home or voted third party, urging them to vote Democrat is both theoretically possible and already not much of a stretch for them, especially if you toss on the lure of it as being a way to prove once and for all that they're not one of THOSE conservatives.

Is there not any bigger cuck than those? Since voting is private and if they're really that ashamed they could just make up a little white lie. Fucking shameful and spineless, man.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

Not sure if this counts but a bit of out of place political sperging in a review of a Logan Paul movie.

 

[Wallace]

Don't know if posted already but:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...rats-third-party-stay-home-column/1669812002/
Ver archivo adjunto 583006

EDIT:

"I'm going to choose defect; be reasonable and choose cooperate."

 

[Cubanodun]

Don't know if posted already but:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...rats-third-party-stay-home-column/1669812002/
Ver archivo adjunto 583006

EDIT:

Please vote for democrats, even when we called you subhuman, nazi, racist, sexist, homophobe, transphobe, manchildren, but please PLEASE vote for us

That red wave is coming with extra salt