Law Trump administration proposes cutting refugee limit to lowest level in program's history

After Nulls' recent thread on the state of A&H, I have come up with a new system. I'll post two threads from a right-wing source, then two from a left-wing source, and then try for two centrist ones. Keep things balanced.
The Trump administration on Thursday recommended restructuring admittance requirements and cutting the number of refugees admitted to the United States each year to 18,000 -- the lowest number since the resettlement program began in 1980.

For the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, the Trump administration recommended cutting the refugee number by more than a third after last year’s record low of 30,000. The number would be a fraction of the 110,000-refugee target the Obama administration tried to set for FY 2017.

The administration must consult with Congress on the total number of refugees to be permitted for the next fiscal year, and Congress could look for a higher number. The administration also proposed allocating numbers by groups of special humanitarian interest rather than region. Religious minorities will be prioritized with 5,000 spots, Iraqis who assisted the U.S. are allocated 4,000 spots and 1,500 spots will be reserved for migrants from the Northern Triangle of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

“The administration’s proposed refugee admissions ceiling takes into account the ongoing security and humanitarian crisis on our southern border and the massive asylum backlog, which now includes nearly 1 million individuals,” A State Department spokesperson explained.

“The United States anticipates receiving more than 368,000 new refugees and asylum claims in FY 2020. Of them, 18,000 would be refugees we propose to resettle under the new refugee ceiling; we also anticipate processing more than 350,000 individuals in new asylum cases,” the spokesperson said.

While only 18,000 would be granted refugee status, another 350,000 from the backlog of 1 million would have asylum claims processed. Asylum is granted to migrants already inside the U.S., while refugees are requesting protection from outside the country. In an effort to reduce asylum claims, the White House banned asylum in the U.S. for anyone who had traveled through a third country and wasn't denied asylum there. If a migrant from Honduras travels through Mexico to get to the U.S., he or she must first apply and be denied asylum in Mexico before the case will be heard by the U.S.

President Trump also signed an executive order in which refugees will only be resettled in jurisdictions where state and local governments consent to receiving them. After they've been admitted to the U.S., however, they are free to move about wherever they please, according to a senior administration official.

The State Department statement made sure to note that refugee and asylum claims are in addition to more than $8 billion the U.S. provided in overseas humanitarian assistance in FY 2018, “more than any other country.” “Our assistance reaches tens of millions of displaced and crisis-affected people worldwide, including those who will never be eligible or considered for third-country resettlement.”

Rich Edson contributed to this report.
This isn't enough. If I were to go about, there would be a fifty year moratorium on immigration. It's the only way for the population to settle and stabalize.
And if you really want to help reugees, five thousand families maximum.
 
It’s funny how when Trump actually does something to follow up on his promises people still shit on him for it. From a humanitarian perspective, this is the most valid immigration cut to oppose. They’re mostly mohammedians though, so I’m behind it, but I can’t imagine moderates will be.
 
We need to stop giving aid to other countries and taking in their undesirables until we fix our own shit first. How about we work on the massive amounts of poverty and income disparity and our fucked healthcare system before we bring in millions of 3rd world barbarians.
 
Considering how many refugees are found to just be rent-seekers who want to leech off the good will and generosity of better societies than them, fuck them. The only refugees I would be okay with taking are white South Africans.
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • C02w56xXgAAD-MV.jpg
    C02w56xXgAAD-MV.jpg
    58.4 KB · Vistas: 81
We need to stop giving aid to other countries and taking in their undesirables until we fix our own shit first. How about we work on the massive amounts of poverty and income disparity and our fucked healthcare system before we bring in millions of 3rd world barbarians.
I totally agree, but it's kinda tough to take that stance when the exact opposite sentiment is etched into the Statue of Liberty.
 
Última edición:
I totally agree, but it's kinda tough to take that stance when the exact opposite sentiment is etched into the State of Liberty.

No it isn't, it's very easy to take that stance, or any stance at all, regardless of what's on the Statue of Liberty.

Nice-sounding poetry on a national landmark is not legally-binding in any way.
 
Última edición:
I totally agree, but it's kinda tough to take that stance when the exact opposite sentiment is etched into the Statue of Liberty.
The statue was only given to the US after the Egyptians declined, look where they are now.
Any gayass poem they wrote on it doesn't count because we weren't the first choice recipients.
 
Another devastating blow to idiots who think the tablet the statue of liberty's holding is official US policy.
 
Refugee, much like Nazi, has lost any and all meaning. America respects the poor and weary, but for fucks sake, please at least have a modicum of respect for our country and it’s laws.
 
Then the immigrants can go to Ellis Island and we'll bring back the immigration policies from when some beret wearing faggot wrote the poem.
It was written by a Frenchman. Who gives a shit?
Actually Emma Lazarus, an American Jewish woman, wrote the poem. She was an activist for Jewish causes in America. She also wrote poems such as "The Banner of the Jew."

The excerpt of one of her poems written in 1883 is what was inscribed on the plaque in 1903. The statue of Liberty was gifted to the US in 1886, so the poem is an afterthought somebody (probably New York Jews) thought would be nice.

Go figure.
 
Última edición:
Refugee, much like Nazi, has lost any and all meaning. America respects the poor and weary, but for fucks sake, please at least have a modicum of respect for our country and it’s laws.
America only respects foreign poor and weary because we don't imagine the ways they became this way, or we imagine they had no agency in it. We imagine our own poor and weary to have had complete control over their own downfall, maybe not if they're black and you're liberal
 
Actually Emma Lazarus, an American Jewish woman, wrote the poem. She was an activist for Jewish causes in America. She also wrote poems such as "The Banner of the Jew."

The excerpt of one of her poems written in 1883 is what was inscribed on the plaque in 1903. The statue of Liberty was gifted to the US in 1886, so the poem is an afterthought somebody (probably New York Jews) thought would be nice.

Go figure.

Here's a pretty good rundown on Lazarus for anyone interested;


TL;DW - Lazarus got published because of Jewish nepotism in an effort to get the US to allow in more Russian Jews. Also, her family got rich selling poison to American kids.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo